Leaderboard

I'm skeptical. I'm skeptical of Mike's claims. I'm skeptical of those claiming he's hoaxing. I'm skeptical of the guy claiming to hoax him. There's a fundamental principle we can apply if we are going to be rigorous instead of being knee jerk ... fools. Until we know, we don't know. Until we know what is, we don't know what can't be. Certainty of opinion does not equate to knowledge .. that's a form of narcissism. I think we need to allow this to be an unanswered question, something that may be uncomfortable to those who need an answer even if it is wrong more than they need the truth. We don't have the truth. So IMHO we need to let this stay a question, neither accepting nor rejecting, just watching .. then see what unfolds. Gotta remember how many people believed the so-called debunking of the PGF simply because they had an emotional need for it to be a hoax. Yet it has never been debunked. It has not been proven, either. Lack of a viable means of hoaxing does not eliminate a hoax any more than lack of proof of bigfoot is proof of lack of bigfoot. We need to let this be a question. As they say, 'just sit with it', and not try to force an answer where there isn't one.

Getting back to the silliness of the first post in this topic for a sec: Yes, Bigfoot is my Bigfoot. That is because, until shown otherwise, I have my own ideas of what they are, just like many others who are interested in this subject and don't simply just endeavor to waste everyone else's time trolling forums. Bigfoot is my Bigfoot and any useless troll that doesn't like that can take it up with him, her, they, them, it, or whatever else they perceive the damn thing to be. Excelsior!

I will give you credit. You are tenacious. You probably have 50 socket puppet profiles on here. I don’t mind a difference of opinion. But you’re just here in bad faith. You are a troll. 🤷‍♂️ Which I utterly do not understand. Do something constructive with your life. 👍

HA! just got a Down Vote, that took 2 minutes! Kind of sad that this site doesn't require identity of the "voters"