Guest Sallaranda Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 I'm not sure how many of you have attempted to contact Erickson's project, but I did and received a fairly immediate reply. My email was directly in regards to the Sylvanic website being linked on the Erickson project website, and I received a pretty interesting email in reply. I'm apprehensive about posting the email response on a public forum, but if anybody wants to contact me via PM and discuss the email I'd be more than happy to. I really do want to get another individual's opinion on this email, as I'm quite concerned about it right now.
Guest jimmy simpson Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 My guess would have to be that Erickson is not familiar with many elements of Standing's past claims that led to his present place. However they are fellow Canadians, and that may well be something that resonated with Erickson. He may even have noticed how others 'appear' to rebuke Standing's claims and therefore think this is one of those instances where a witness was 'crucified by the gang'. Unfortunately he probably does not know of the contradictory claims that exist. If he knew, there's no way he'd risk so much through the association. His interest may be superficial and that its based on what can be seen on Standing's website and even follow up discussion, of which I can only imagine. Mr. Erickson may want to do a little more thorough research. Remember all, it was a "2' X 2' hole through a mountain chain". Makes me think Erickson doesnt follow the sasquatch world much at all.... which is hard to believe considering he was an investigator for the bfro....and its not the association with standing thats a concern.... as far as im concerned if you put the link on your site its almost an endoresement....
Guest jimmy simpson Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Hi Jimmy! The only way I could see why Standing is linked is possibly explained in my post # 149 on page 5 of this topic. Read on from there for a page or so and see what you think. Who knows... Thanks efrum... ya it could be something to do with that... I dont know. Something about this whole thing doesnt make sense... there are a few flags..... thats the concern for me... Why havent we heard anything from Standing lately?? I paid for the videos standing had for sale a couple years ago.... he just says things sometimes that makes it seem like hes trying to sound to intelligent, to the point it sounds fake.
Guest Posted March 13, 2011 Posted March 13, 2011 Some new infos concerning the Standing-Erickson connection: www.sasquat.com
Guest Cervelo Posted March 13, 2011 Posted March 13, 2011 Some new infos concerning the Standing-Erickson connection: www.sasquat.com Wow that's a buzz kill:(
Guest Posted March 13, 2011 Posted March 13, 2011 (edited) Chris, you have put a lot of work into this question of Slyvanic's involvement. Thank You. I questioned the involvement of TS from the moment i went through the STQ site. I agree the face looks like a mask. 'what the ;;;; am i supposed to do' is so hammy. Kings Speach NOT. edited: cos its sunday, the boeuf bourguignon is in the oven and ive had a glass of red wine Edited March 13, 2011 by megatarsal
Guest Sallaranda Posted March 13, 2011 Posted March 13, 2011 SwissChris, your email is ominously similar to mine, and I'm sure her reply was almost identical to what I received. One way or another, this doesn't look good for the Erickson project.
Guest Posted March 13, 2011 Posted March 13, 2011 One way or another, this doesn't look good for the Erickson project. You know, it doesn't mean that their video evidence isn't legit, but if they can be fooled by something like THIS, what else have they accepted as real that is actually faked?
Ronnie Bass Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 Chris, did you supply her a link to this thread? I know you mentioned the forum to her but it would be interesting to see if she would come in and discuss this with us, a very long shot in most likely hood but you never know.
Guest Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 This is disturbing to say the least. It does look like species protection is big for Erickson too and is partially responsible for the connection. We don't know for certain, but Standing's films are highly questionable. His dramatic posts are ridiculous. YOU WILL DIE!!! :blob: Maybe Standing helped Erickson out and he is linking to his website as a courtesy. Let's hope so. At least he hasn't been in any of the documentary clips yet.
Guest jimmy simpson Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 If Erickson and Todd Standing are both involved and both knowingly perpetrating a hoax .... I feel sorry for John Bindernagel ... whose website is also linked there. Currently reading his book. the discovery of sasquatch. I hope this doesnt reflect poorly on him
Guest jimmy simpson Posted March 14, 2011 Posted March 14, 2011 I got a bad feeling as soon as i seen the Sylvanic link on the Erickson site.... and its not getting any better
Recommended Posts