Erickson Project

[Guest Bigfoot Proof]

According to Erickson his release will coincide with Ketchum's DNA findings, a smart move. He wants all his ducks in a row with as much corroborative evidence as possible. And I imagine it will be a major network, possibly a Larry King type show? All this takes time, time and more time... plus Ketchum's detailed findings are (as far as I know) still under review?

Though the waiting really sucks, I think the locked-up results will be unshakable and worth the wait.... I hope!

Humans didn't need fire either, but once they discovered it, utilized it to their advantage. Turned out to be a major turning point in evolution. Before fire, human's could eat raw beef without worries. Now, odds are we'd be sick in bed for a week if we ate beef right off the back of a cow.

As far as temperature control goes, the thick fur of a Bigfoot may not be enough to survive cold winters at higher altitudes. Fire would still serve as an effective survival tool.

I wouldn't be surprised if Bigfoot had already discovered fire, but utilized it to a much lesser degree.

I agree with that I have seen a few reports where BF was suspected of using a small fire possibly for cooking BUT they are smart enough to know its a dead giveaway to their location so this is not something they opt to use.

By eating raw they are keeping themselves clean of many of our illnesses and ailments, smart! And obviously they have maintained the digestive enzymes to allow this.

+++++

Well, wait a minute... I just did a quick search and apparently people today have reverted to eating all raw food with no issues and studies have been done with this, just Google 'can humans eat raw meat' very interesting, apparently we are NOT made to be meat eaters in the first place... but we do, and if we revert raw its no issue... and actually better for us! Of course ideally it would be a fresh kill.

I'll be, this is something I never gave a thought to, even though I feed my dogs raw because I knew it was better for them. (Not all the time but half, they get raw)

[Guest]

According to Erickson his release will coincide with Ketchum's DNA findings, a smart move. He wants all his ducks in a row with as much corroborative evidence as possible. And I imagine it will be a major network, possibly a Larry King type show?

Looks like there will be a press conference to release the findings.

Derek Randles said,

(Derek, if you're reading this I hope you don't mind me quoting you here.)

"As a matter of fact I've never met Adrian either. We will meet when the press conference rolls around and I'm looking forward to it."

[Wheellug]

According to Erickson his release will coincide with Ketchum's DNA findings, a smart move. He wants all his ducks in a row with as much corroborative evidence as possible. And I imagine it will be a major network, possibly a Larry King type show? All this takes time, time and more time... plus Ketchum's detailed findings are (as far as I know) still under review?

Though the waiting really sucks, I think the locked-up results will be unshakable and worth the wait.... I hope!

I agree with that I have seen a few reports where BF was suspected of using a small fire possibly for cooking BUT they are smart enough to know its a dead giveaway to their location so this is not something they opt to use.

By eating raw they are keeping themselves clean of many of our illnesses and ailments, smart! And obviously they have maintained the digestive enzymes to allow this.

+++++

Well, wait a minute... I just did a quick search and apparently people today have reverted to eating all raw food with no issues and studies have been done with this, just Google 'can humans eat raw meat' very interesting, apparently we are NOT made to be meat eaters in the first place... but we do, and if we revert raw its no issue... and actually better for us! Of course ideally it would be a fresh kill.

I'll be, this is something I never gave a thought to, even though I feed my dogs raw because I knew it was better for them. (Not all the time but half, they get raw)

on the raw food deal.. it's always been okay to eat raw foods. Cooking foods causes a break down of cells and makes the nutrients more available. So you get more out of less by cooking.

Eating raw foods it's up to your chewing and your gut to get what it can.

[Guest bsruther]

It may be relatively safe to eat raw meat that's been processed and inspected, but wild game is a different story. Humans can contract Trichinosis, from eating the raw meat of wild animals and I don't see any reason why BF wouldn't ,as well.

Trichinosis seems to rarely be a life threatening illness, but can wreak havoc on a body, in some cases.

[Guest]

It may be relatively safe to eat raw meat that's been processed and inspected, but wild game is a different story. Humans can contract Trichinosis, from eating the raw meat of wild animals and I don't see any reason why BF wouldn't ,as well.

Trichinosis seems to rarely be a life threatening illness, but can wreak havoc on a body, in some cases.

The parasites that cause trichinosis can pass through the intestinal tract, but muscle tissues are where the majority of them persist.

That being said, I seem to recall many reports of supposed squatch-kills where only the liver was missing. Should be a pretty safe meal for the big guys.

[Guest]

What will we do here once everyone knows that there is a BF species?

I will miss all of the fun we have here.

Xion Comrade said:

If Patty doesn't look human, then nothing does tbh. Not only the body shape, but the face also. I don't see how anyone could see it otherwise. As a matter of fact, it looks more human than many humans I have seen XD

Susi says:

HTG, I don't think that I'm vain, but if I woke up and saw that I looked like Patty, I would not wish to continue to live!

Patty is not a cave man type of person, but Patty/ BF is something other.

She is covered with hair, huge with muscles, and her face is sorta human, but not.Also, Her hair does not grow long on her head as our does,her hair is pretty much the same everywhere.

Patty is between human and ape, but more on the ape side.

Her face is human like, but not human.

[Guest]

Maybe Patty is just Butch! lol But that is a good point Susie, cause there are reports of them having longer hair on the head too. The ones I got a good look at didn't have longer hair on their heads. Interesting.

[Guest]

I read on another thread that at the Sasquatch Summit Adrian Erickson announced that this was 'The Year of the Sasquatch' 2011, and that the animal would be conclusively proven this year.

What will we do here once everyone knows that there is a BF species?

I will miss all of the fun we have here.

Susi, for those of us fortunate enough to put our heads on our pillow every night knowing for a fact these creatures exist, this is only the beginning. The discussions and encounters will keep going, and a fresh approach will be taken to these discussions because the "do they/don't they exist" question will be nullified.

[Xion Comrade]

Susi says:

HTG, I don't think that I'm vain, but if I woke up and saw that I looked like Patty, I would not wish to continue to live!

Patty is not a cave man type of person, but Patty/ BF is something other.

She is covered with hair, huge with muscles, and her face is sorta human, but not.Also, Her hair does not grow long on her head as our does,her hair is pretty much the same everywhere.

Patty is between human and ape, but more on the ape side.

Her face is human like, but not human.

HAHAHA! True, I gotcha, but human looking nonetheless. The really thick skin and humongous facial bones are what you see, and I have seen the same on people to a lesser degree. Basically Patty is like a real life super man. Patty may well be a "Cave man" sort of deal to put it bluntly, fits the description well.

I read on another thread that at the Sasquatch Summit Adrian Erickson announced that this was 'The Year of the Sasquatch' 2011, and that the animal would be conclusively proven this year.

Susi, for those of us fortunate enough to put our heads on our pillow every night knowing for a fact these creatures exist, this is only the beginning. The discussions and encounters will keep going, and a fresh approach will be taken to these discussions because the "do they/don't they exist" question will be nullified.

Yes! And we will be one step closer to the question that is really on our mind, and to what we really want! When can we have a pet Sasquatch?

[Guest]

Yes! And we will be one step closer to the question that is really on our mind, and to what we really want! When can we have a pet Sasquatch?

"...He followed me home. CAN I KEEP HIM?!?"

[Guest]

I read on another thread that at the Sasquatch Summit Adrian Erickson announced that this was 'The Year of the Sasquatch' 2011, and that the animal would be conclusively proven this year.

Another hint: the "animal". Can you provide the source?

[Guest]

Another hint: the "animal". Can you provide the source?

Hi SwissChris! Love your blog!

It was second hand info from BCCryptid, who was there. Those were BC's words, so I'm not sure if they were Adrian's exact words. Located here, at the end of post #5.

http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/topic/4670-any-reports-from-the-harrison-hot-springs-sasquatch-summit/page__pid__53900#entry53900

[Guest]

I read on another thread that at the Sasquatch Summit Adrian Erickson announced that this was 'The Year of the Sasquatch' 2011, and that the animal would be conclusively proven this year.

Susi, for those of us fortunate enough to put our heads on our pillow every night knowing for a fact these creatures exist, this is only the beginning. The discussions and encounters will keep going, and a fresh approach will be taken to these discussions because the "do they/don't they exist" question will be nullified.

Efrum, I can't wait to say in a nice way "I Told you so...to hubby!

He does not believe in Bigfoot.

I really will not say I told you so, I will say that there is evidence proving their existence because as a scientist, he will need verification that he can understand to help him accept the reality of the species..I'm so excited. Do we have any time line for when it will be announced ?

It will be so great to add that new info to our forum's research information. I sincerely hope that BF will be put on a protected species list. Imagine all the hunters who may consider them a trophy to bag. Yikes!

[Guest]

I sincerely hope that BF will be put on a protected species list. Imagine all the hunters who may consider them a trophy to bag. Yikes!

I'd have to agree with Erickson, Paulides, and a few other researchers in saying they need no protection. They've done just fine on their own so far. One could also deduce that what they really mean is that if the species is found to be in the genus homo, then the act of killing one would be considered homicide. Bingo! Instant protection upon recognition.

Efrum, I can't wait to say in a nice way "I Told you so...to hubby!

He does not believe in Bigfoot.

I really will not say I told you so, I will say that there is evidence proving their existence because as a scientist, he will need verification that he can understand to help him accept the reality of the species..I'm so excited. Do we have any time line for when it will be announced ?

Dr. Ketchum stated on BigfootBusters Radio last Halloween that she expects the peer review to pass by late spring of this year. Her findings and Erickson's project should come out shortly after.

Oh, I've got a whole BAG full of "I told you I wasn't seeing things!" that I plan to unleash on a few folks...

[Guest]

So how will it be announced? Will there be a nationally covered news conference and press releases handed out?

That will be so exciting. I can but I won't say to hubby "I told you so" It'll be hard, but I'll try to behave magnanimosity towards him..

When will there be a date for the release of the news?

How can we locate that news on the net?