Erickson Project

[Guest]

Efrum, How could they have so much evidence collected for years of studying and testing and not have body parts?

Hi Susi! Those are Derek's words from the Olympic Project, not mine. It's here, post #7

[Xion Comrade]

if they are a species of human, how long do you think it will take for someone to atempt inter breeding with them?

Hell who wouldn't! If you like big burly testosterone pumped meat heads, well the Squatch men are king! If you manage to pick up one of the women with a lucky box of chocolates, you get the bragging rights that your girl can kick such and suches girl's butt any day of the week! Very low maintenance too, hell you don't even have to own a house! Then of course the biggest and most important thing, the kids assuming they would be healthy, would be instant stars in any sport you entered them in, would never get picked on. Would do great in the military too(recon) assuming they aren't total idiots(Come to think of it, most of the horror stories told by some of my veteran friends in the military came from such troops, so recon is a no go O.o...like 14 going out to try to find a downed Humvee, but only one returns. Tigers eating them when they were out was another spine tingling ordeal O.o).

But back to the kids, remember having to buy totally new clothes every month for years for your kid? Or buying that way way to oversized coat so it would last them a few? Never....Never even buy clothes....As a matter of fact, get them a trench coat and call it quits XD Boy though, if you decided to feed them on your wallet instead of teaching them to waylay wildlife, you would be totally screwed! Boy or Girl! On the bright side, I guarantee they cannot be any wilder or more dangerous than most human kids....Seem like pretty mild mannered critters to me.

And what are the disadvantages? Smelly house? Broken bones...Spending vacations hiking and getting smoked in the process as your mate accidentally walks 3x faster than you do....Losing at arm wrestling to your ol'lady every time, even with both arms. I would say the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages XD

[Guest]

OK, obviously time to chime in. We do not now, nor have we ever had a Sasquatch body. I'll repeat. We do not have a Sasquatch body. I don't know of anyone who has a Sasquatch body.

One of the biggest problems in this field is trying to wade through the rumors and find your way to the facts. One small piece of information repeated again and again can become extremely diluted, misconstrued and evolve into something completely different. That's exactly whats happening here. I've had three people get a hold of me today and ask about a body. It's funny and sad all at the same time.

The Olympic Project works with many people. We have provided samples to the DNA study. Multiple people we work with have provided samples to the DNA study, but none of those samples are a body. We don't have a body.

Researchers here on this forum who know, or have worked with me, know I'm a man of integrity, and I promise to any that care, I am telling the truth. I hope this clears a few things up.

To admin, I'm sorry, I know this is probably the wrong thread for this, but the "body talk" keeps popping up and I felt I needed to say something.

Derek

Yikes! The reason that I have strongly suspected that a body, or a baby, or part of a body has been found was due to the large amount of material which was available to do the DNA screens, and other testing.

Scat and hair can only go so far. How could they collect blood? How did they find blood, if they did test blood?

I truly believe that they have a specimen of some sort of a BF, more than just hair and scat..

I have *no* proof, but this is what I believe. I hope that I'm not in trouble for posting my beliefs?

I truly meant no harm, I just can't reconcile the amount of *matter* they have to test to just hair and scat specimens.

My friend southernyahoo said:

*BTW I have a sample in the study as well.*

Susi exclaims :

You do?

That is wonderful!

I'm so proud of and for you.

Will your specimen have your name on it so that you can and will be able to get the results?

I'm so happy and excited for you. Your name will be in the report as a contributor, correct?

I love our members. Each is special in their own way, and you sir, stand out!

Wow, To be a part of these historical revelations when BF is officially recognized is just amazing.I'm thrilled for you.

I want someone I know telling me first when it hits the national networks. Someone who who was in the " yeah right" point of view. They will question a lot then. It is similar to looking out to the heavens and realizing how small we truly are. I hope all who are involved will be seen by the lens of history as good men who did the right thing.

Amen Believer, Amen. These are exciting times. I had hoped that this would happen in my life time, and it now seems that it will.

You, Sir, will be remembered for your contribution.

This is the greatest group of people that I have ever had the pleasure of knowing, and being just a lowly member among the people who will bring the truth to light.

You who have spent your life, time, and money to bring this species to recognition deserve high praise and gratitude from the rest of us.

This is so amazing. A true historical event will happen soon.I'm Ready!

Edited April 22, 2011 by Splash7

[southernyahoo]

My friend southernyahoo said:

*BTW I have a sample in the study as well.*

Susi exclaims :

You do?

That is wonderful!

I'm so proud of and for you.

Will your specimen have your name on it so that you can and will be able to get the results?

I'm so happy and excited for you. Your name will be in the report as a contributor, correct?

I love our members. Each is special in their own way, and you sir, stand out!

Wow, To be a part of these historical revelations when BF is officially recognized is just amazing.I'm thrilled for you.

Yes I sent Dr. Ketchum some of the hair sample collected by myself and a couple associates in central Oklahoma, They made the cut so to speak, so my name will be in the paper along with my associates. I can't claim an elaborate field study behind what we do, just that we happened to be following up on a type of sign in the right place and found a sizable sample which turns out to be interesting. There is also enough for repeating tests. It should be interesting because of the extreme difference in habitat this was collected from in comparison to the PNW and Kentucky.

[gigantor]

Yikes! The reason that I have strongly suspected that a body, or a baby, or part of a body has been found was due to the large amount of material which was available to do the DNA screens, and other testing.

Scat and hair can only go so far.

Susi,

Once you have a good sample of DNA, it can be copied over and over again. Kinda like having a good recording of a song, you can make more copies from the original.

[Guest]

Hey susi...You seem to be a great person with a big heart, but it appears you haven't been around the bigfoot world very long. I can all but assure you nobody has a a type specimen, and this "project" will undoubtedly let you down. I just think you need to temper your excitement so you don't have a monumental let down...Do you truly believe if someone had a bigfoot in there possession they would just sit on it for months upon months?

[Guest]

bipedalist

SC Chairman

Group:FMT

Posts:1,186

Joined:29-August 10

Locationsoutheast

Posted 01 November 2010 - 01:50 PM

Try this:

or this: http://www.blogtalkr...t-busters-radio

First is coast to coast in six parts with Paulides/Ketchum**** (at 10:45 in 3 of 6 they mention bone and tissue)***

Second is BTR/Bigfoot Busters archived show with Paulides/Ketchum/Erickso

Susi says:

Bone and tissue? Definite proof they say? Is this true? Have you guys heard this broadcast?

Bone and tissue are a definite *part* of a body. What's going on? Are they misleading us? Usually with bones found there may not be any tissue left, but in this case it seems that perhaps they do have a body part, maybe a small one, but nonetheless, a piece of a body...with tissue attached to a bone possibly.

I do have a college education, nothing like my hubby, but still, bone and possible tissue is a big deal to me.

Remember Lucy, a small bone equals a new person type..

Hey susi...You seem to be a great person with a big heart, but it appears you haven't been around the bigfoot world very long. I can all but assure you nobody has a a type specimen, and this "project" will undoubtedly let you down. I just think you need to temper your excitement so you don't have a monumental let down...Do you truly believe if someone had a bigfoot in there possession they would just sit on it for months upon months?

Well, I was feeling pretty low until I discovered this posting. Now I think that I was close to being correct..

I hope this is not smoke and mirrors...

Susi,

Once you have a good sample of DNA, it can be copied over and over again. Kinda like having a good recording of a song, you can make more copies from the original.

Thank you so very much for this information. I did not know that. I thought the specimens were being destroyed with each test. Wow, Things are looking up, I think. Of course, I have a very slight tendency to be optimistic, just a little...

Just in case you guys have not noticed that aspect of my personality. I was born this way...

Hey susi...You seem to be a great person with a big heart, but it appears you haven't been around the bigfoot world very long. I can all but assure you nobody has a a type specimen, and this "project" will undoubtedly let you down. I just think you need to temper your excitement so you don't have a monumental let down...Do you truly believe if someone had a bigfoot in there possession they would just sit on it for months upon months?

You, Kind Sir, are a sweetie...

To answer your question: Possibly a big *yes*, maybe...

Yes I sent Dr. Ketchum some of the hair sample collected by myself and a couple associates in central Oklahoma, They made the cut so to speak, so my name will be in the paper along with my associates. I can't claim an elaborate field study behind what we do, just that we happened to be following up on a type of sign in the right place and found a sizable sample which turns out to be interesting. There is also enough for repeating tests. It should be interesting because of the extreme difference in habitat this was collected from in comparison to the PNW and Kentucky.

Susi says:

I am so very proud and happy for you!

Well done, Sir..

Having your name on this revelation is monumental, IMVHO.

Susi, I know you are a true Lady, loving and caring person. You always give everyone the benefit of the doubt and take them at their word. You remind me of my Mom.

However, you are building yourself up for the big fall. You're getting too excited and I fear you'll come crashing down like a meteor later on. Step back, take a break for a week and see how it looks to you after that.

Please tell you mom hello for me, and tell her that I'm watching over you here at the BF forums, just from one mom to another...

Edited April 22, 2011 by Splash7

[southernyahoo]

Do you truly believe if someone had a bigfoot in there possession they would just sit on it for months upon months?

I'd say even if a body was had, they would still be doing the DNA work to confirm what it was, and looking for comparative samples to establish a breeding population of said species.

[Guest]

I'd say even if a body was had, they would still be doing the DNA work to confirm what it was, and looking for comparative samples to establish a breeding population of said species.

My take is if someone did find a BF "esque" body the media would be all over it like poop to a shovel...Things like a sasquatch body have a tendency of not staying a secret for long.

[BobbyO]

My take is if someone did find a BF "esque" body the media would be all over it like poop to a shovel...Things like a sasquatch body have a tendency of not staying a secret for long.

Don't they ??

Do you have an example of this & why would you think that if a Body was found, in the back Country of the Queene Charlotte Islannds for example, would you think the Media would even be remotely " all over it ", if it wasn't soemthing that the people who found it decided to make public immediately/if ever ??

[Guest]

Don't they ??

Do you have an example of this & why would you think that if a Body was found, in the back Country of the Queene Charlotte Islannds for example, would you think the Media would even be remotely " all over it ", if it wasn't soemthing that the people who found it decided to make public immediately/if ever ??

I see both sides of your argument Bobby. On one hand if someone wanted to keep something secret and stash it away(i.e. missings persons who aren't found). On the other hand a man says "git" to a Bigfoot in North Carolina, it goes viral and that poor excuse for a Bigfoot crossing the road a week or two ago did the same.

[BobbyO]

I see both sides of your argument Bobby. On one hand if someone wanted to keep something secret and stash it away(i.e. missings persons who aren't found). On the other hand a man says "git" to a Bigfoot in North Carolina, it goes viral and that poor excuse for a Bigfoot crossing the road a week or two ago did the same.

Except there would be searches for " missing persons ", there wouldn't be/isn't for undiscovered Animals hence even less if any, exposure at all to the media, as there wouldn't be/isn't anything to actually look for..

I still don't see how " things like a BF Body have a tendancy to not staying a secret for long " though..

[Guest]

Except there would be searches for " missing persons ", there wouldn't be/isn't for undiscovered Animals hence even less if any, exposure at all to the media, as there wouldn't be/isn't anything to actually look for..

I still don't see how " things like a BF Body have a tendancy to not staying a secret for long " though..

Well, Tissue samples and bone do not a body make. However, they did come from something.

I'm so very hopeful!

Plus, Add in the NDA's, and you have a genuine secret.

My hubby and military son keep secrets.

My hubby does stuff that I find out about from the sweet people who call *me* to tell me how hubby did something to help them out due to his job with making diagnosis.

He had a friend of the family come in to his office where he explained to her what her hubby had, and what that diagnosis meant.

She had tears in her eyes as she related how much my hubby's advice meant to her.

I also, in my Oncology nursing, had to keep secrets.

However, It would *kill* me to keep this secret.

I admire our members who have honored their NDAs. You guys are truly amazing.

My military son is an officer, and he also keeps secrets, usually it seems to keep from scaring his mother to death!

[Guest]

I see both sides of your argument Bobby. On one hand if someone wanted to keep something secret and stash it away(i.e. missings persons who aren't found). On the other hand a man says "git" to a Bigfoot in North Carolina, it goes viral and that poor excuse for a Bigfoot crossing the road a week or two ago did the same.

Susi says:

I understand your frustration.

The media makes a *joke* out of all things BF.

It will take the species being revealed with DNA proof and photos and/or a body before the media will sit up and take *serious* notice.

To the intellectual elite (aka the media) Bigfootery is a joke, a hoax, and the media thinks that they are too smart to fall for that type of *junk* science.

I'm looking forward to seeing how *they* handle the truth.

Plus they need a few * raspberries*

I'm so *Bad*!

Edited April 22, 2011 by Susiq2

[Guest]

I'd say even if a body was had, they would still be doing the DNA work to confirm what it was, and looking for comparative samples to establish a breeding population of said species.

Susi says:

How would that be accomplished?

It appears that in the past researchers have had a dearth of evidence that science will accept, unless we are able to produce the DNA and biological evidence needed, which I'm really hoping will happen soon!

But, How do you prove that there is a breeding population?