Guest Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 And also in the humble opinion of anyone who has ever met Adrain Erikson! A lot of promotion with no evidence! Biscardi would be proud! Are you saying that the people behind this big revelation are hoaxers? Is all of this smoke and mirrors? I thought that these were serious and respected researchers with genuine results. Are we talking about the same project? Yikes! I sincerely hope not.
Guest Cervelo Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 (edited) There doesn't seem to be any problem publishing on a probable new species of the genus homo with not much more than a pinky bone, but this one is supposed to be extinct, so we need not worry about the conservation of it's kind. a.html'>http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100324/full/46447 2a.html Sorry SY! Ya got a Bigfoot pinky bone laying around do ya! Edited April 22, 2011 by Cervelo
Guest Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Didnt Mike Rugg have a large canine tooth that some guy donated to his museum? Thought MR decided he could get it tested without destroying it. Maybe this went to Dr Ketchum?
Guest Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Didnt Mike Rugg have a large canine tooth that some guy donated to his museum? Thought MR decided he could get it tested without destroying it. Maybe this went to Dr Ketchum? Looks like he did. Check the video around 2:55.
Guest Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 (edited) thats the one think i saw it after Pualides and Ketchum were on Bigfoot Busters. He says samples were sent to LA and Texas with other bone sample 'to get to'. Is DNA Diagnostic's Inc based in Texas? couldnt find any reference to location on MK's website. Edited April 22, 2011 by megatarsal
Guest Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 thats the one think i saw it after Pualides and Ketchum were on Bigfoot Busters. He says samples were sent to LA and Texas with other bone sample 'to get to'. Is DNA Diagnostic's Inc based in Texas? couldnt find any reference to location on MK's website. Yep. It's in Texas. Here ya go. http://dnadiagnostics.com/index.html
southernyahoo Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 Sorry SY! Ya got a Bigfoot pinky bone laying around do ya! Don't need one, better DNA is had from tissue.
Guest Cervelo Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 Don't need one, better DNA is had from tissue. So if you and I are done with snarkfest. How about answering the original question?
southernyahoo Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 The "Original" question? Did it not get answered somwhere? I have hair with tissue, no bones.
Guest Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 You have tissue with hair attached? How large is your specimen? Have you submitted it for analysis? Where was the BF that the sample came from? I have heard of excellent samples being available for testing. You did submit your sample, correct? thats the one think i saw it after Pualides and Ketchum were on Bigfoot Busters. He says samples were sent to LA and Texas with other bone sample 'to get to'. Is DNA Diagnostic's Inc based in Texas? couldnt find any reference to location on MK's website. Susi says: Are there Other bone samples to get to for testing? I'm being just a little silly with this question, but please answer: What happened to the rest of the body? Bones usually have muscles attached to them. Do you have muscle attached to your bone piece/fragment? Bones are the inner most body support. Muscles are attached to bones to move the bones so we can walk, and indeed, breath. How did you discover this bone? Where did you discover it? Well,just the general area so you don't disclose something... Hugs.....Susi
Guest Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 (edited) @Susiq2: Why don't you just wait until the paper and the documentary comes out? I don't think they will answer your questions because they've signed non-disclosure agreements. They DON'T have a body. It doesn't help anyone if you spread such rumors. Seriously. Edited April 23, 2011 by SwissChris
Ronnie Bass Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 Sorry Susiq2 but I whole heartily agree with Swiss Chris here and I bet many of the old-timers from the old forum do as well, no matter what side of the fence we are from. A lot of us were around for the Georgia hoax and it's always going to be a painful reminder that we need to be always on the side of caution and to leave speculation to the wind. Lets just wait till everything is released before we try to judge what they have and not instead try to guess.
Guest Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 @Susiq2: Why don't you just wait until the paper and the documentary comes out? I don't think they will answer your questions because they've signed non-disclosure agreements. They DON'T have a body. It doesn't help anyone if you spread such rumors. Seriously. Sorry Susiq2 but I whole heartily agree with Swiss Chris here and I bet many of the old-timers from the old forum do as well, no matter what side of the fence we are from. A lot of us were around for the Georgia hoax and it's always going to be a painful reminder that we need to be always on the side of caution and to leave speculation to the wind. Lets just wait till everything is released before we try to judge what they have and not instead try to guess. Susi says: Yikes Thrice!! I truly thought what I was asking about had already been discussed. I read what was said on the Bigfoot radio program, and I asked about the sizes and my own odd questions about what had to my knowledge *already been revealed* on the radio show. I was asking about amounts, and I absolutely would never intensionally reveal or discuss stuff that was not already out. I truly do have honor, and I may ask about something, but no one has to answer. Please tell me if my comment needs to be withdrawn, and I will immediately do so. A Big However, I myself, (after reading everything posted here) came to the startling conclusion that a body, or parts of a BF body had been discovered because of the DNA talk. I arrived at that supposition from the postings here that I read, and I drew my own conclusions from other people comments about the exciting projects going on in the world of Bigfootery... I posted my own personal opinions, and I did have a reason from the research I read about, but those were my thoughts, and as it turned out, bones and skin have been recovered, and I understand enough about this research to know that it takes a decent amount of *matter* to be able to get good conclusions.. I was thrilled to hear about that because it means so much more towards the big day when you guys hold your Press Conference and tell the world what you have discovered, and proven to be true. Please let me know what posts you wish for me to delete, and I will do so immediately. I never ever meant to cause anyone any distress, and I sincerely apologize for anything that has caused anyone any problems whatsoever.
Guest ajciani Posted April 24, 2011 Posted April 24, 2011 Didnt Mike Rugg have a large canine tooth that some guy donated to his museum? Thought MR decided he could get it tested without destroying it. Maybe this went to Dr Ketchum? It was about half a molar. They hoped to sample it without destroying it, but they cast a mold just in case, which caused it to break apart. I think the mold was successful. Yes, they did send samples of the tooth to Ketchum.
Recommended Posts