Guest Posted April 24, 2011 Posted April 24, 2011 Thanks AJ Sisiq2 - i dont have a bigfoot body unfortunately as far as what happened to the 'rest of the body' (related to the tooth Mike Rugg has) it was probably an ancient bear tooth washed out of the ground by heavy rain. If it has any DNA left to recover we will maybe hear about it sometime. meanwhile patiently waiting.....
southernyahoo Posted April 24, 2011 Posted April 24, 2011 You have tissue with hair attached? How large is your specimen? Have you submitted it for analysis? Where was the BF that the sample came from? I have heard of excellent samples being available for testing. You did submit your sample, correct? Yes the sample is submitted, tested, and sequenced. The results will be in Dr. Ketchums Paper. http://www.texlaresearch.com/hairanalysis.htm
Wheellug Posted April 24, 2011 Posted April 24, 2011 Yes the sample is submitted, tested, and sequenced. The results will be in Dr. Ketchums Paper. http://www.texlaresearch.com/hairanalysis.htm Nice info on th TEXLA page.
southernyahoo Posted April 25, 2011 Posted April 25, 2011 Thanks, we intend to update the page when the results are published.
BobbyO Posted April 25, 2011 SSR Team Posted April 25, 2011 That's a real nice Website you've got there SY, thumbs up...
Guest RioBravo Posted April 30, 2011 Posted April 30, 2011 Post #108 on the NABS's blog suggests that bigfoot is a close human relative. I believe the NABS has been involved in the DNA research from the beginning, so I assume they're confident making this implication. Can anyone "in the know" confirm the results are showing the samples to be more "human than animal"?
Guest Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 Post #108 on the NABS's blog suggests that bigfoot is a close human relative. I believe the NABS has been involved in the DNA research from the beginning, so I assume they're confident making this implication. Can anyone "in the know" confirm the results are showing the samples to be more "human than animal"? Sorry, speaking about the results is most definitely included in the NDA. But as soon as we can we will
Guest Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 Sorry, speaking about the results is most definitely included in the NDA. But as soon as we can we will Without talking results can you say who asked you to sign and owns the NDA? Is it DNA Diagnostics? Can you say who is orchestrating all involved (such as The Erickson Project, NABS, TEXLA, Original 6 and Olympic Project) in the NDA? For me the back story is just as interesting as the lead story. Thanks
Guest Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 (edited) Without talking results can you say who asked you to sign and owns the NDA? Is it DNA Diagnostics? Can you say who is orchestrating all involved (such as The Erickson Project, NABS, TEXLA, Original 6 and Olympic Project) in the NDA? MM NOT Edited May 1, 2011 by megatarsal
Guest jimmy simpson Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Yes the sample is submitted, tested, and sequenced. The results will be in Dr. Ketchums Paper. http://www.texlaresearch.com/hairanalysis.htm when you click on your home page theres a sasquatch pic that comes up temporarily that was the same as the one on the old sylvanic site ...... who is the artist of that picture... and where was it originally designed for???
BobbyO Posted May 4, 2011 SSR Team Posted May 4, 2011 when you click on your home page theres a sasquatch pic that comes up temporarily that was the same as the one on the old sylvanic site ...... who is the artist of that picture... and where was it originally designed for??? What one, this ??
Guest tracker Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 The last time i looked in on this it appeared to be more hype than anything.claimed to have better footage than PGF. so did they show anything? did they have any new evidence? they looked like clowns to me in the trailers so I walked away.
BobbyO Posted May 4, 2011 SSR Team Posted May 4, 2011 The last time i looked in on this it appeared to be more hype than anything.claimed to have better footage than PGF. so did they show anything? did they have any new evidence? they looked like clowns to me in the trailers so I walked away. Never judge a Book by it's cover T.. Still nothing public other than what you've seen & the Boss of the Project stating that this will be " The Year of the Sasquatch " at a recent BC Conference/Gathering. & we wait..
Guest Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Methinks the year of the Sasquatch was the 08' hoax. I'm not holding my breath.
Guest Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Without talking results can you say who asked you to sign and owns the NDA? Is it DNA Diagnostics? Can you say who is orchestrating all involved (such as The Erickson Project, NABS, TEXLA, Original 6 and Olympic Project) in the NDA? For me the back story is just as interesting as the lead story. Thanks Hi Poly, My NDA is with the Erickson Project and they are in a collaborative agreement with DNA Diagnostics.
Recommended Posts