Guest Silver Fox Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 More news from the Erickson Project. Not good news in my opinion... read the comments on Cryptomundo. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/films/brisson-mcdonald.htm http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/brisson-bf2010/ Is another hoaxer involved in the Erickson Project? I am not particularly worried about this. The sad nature of Bigfootery is that is chock full of hoaxers, frauds, liars, sociopaths, narcissists, nuts and scumbags. That's just the nature of the field. There's no getting away from it. All Erickson can do is keep tossing the nuts and hoaxers out of his project. It's a bit like bailing out a slow leaking boat, but it can be done. Even if the Kentucky footage comes out and DNA gets released, the skeptics won't be satisfied. They will tear the footage to pieces, no matter how great it is, and they will massacre Ketchum and her DNA stuff. Not only that, but the hoaxing, lying, fakery and fraud of BF evidence will continue along at the same explosive pace as ever. Some things about this field never change: Skeptics never accept any evidence, no matter how good. Hoaxers keep on hoaxing away with no end in sight. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ajciani Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Wasn't that floating head in another topic somewhere? I vaguely recall some Russian news source publishing a picture of bigfoot, that had a head like that floating in some fur trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 Sasky? Any thoughts on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wudewasa Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 The sad nature of Bigfootery is that is chock full of hoaxers, frauds, liars, sociopaths, narcissists, nuts and scumbags. This is the most accurate statement ever posted on BFF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 (edited) The sad nature of Bigfootery is that is chock full of hoaxers STANDING, frauds BISCARDI, liars MARY GREEN, sociopaths DEFINITION MONEYMAKER, narcissists MONEYMAKER, nuts SWAMP BANDITand scumbags MONEYMAKER. Skeptics never accept any evidence, no matter how good. Hoaxers keep on hoaxing away with no end in sight. So if i get you right Mr Fox, in the 23 yrs, 7 months, 6 weeks, 3 days and 17 hours i have left to live (statistically speaking of course, i hope to live much longer!) there is more chance of science proving the Leprachaun as a living entity than bf? pass me the knitting patterns, i need a new hobby Edited May 15, 2011 by megatarsal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 15, 2011 Share Posted May 15, 2011 So if i get you right Mr Fox, in the 23 yrs, 7 months, 6 weeks, 3 days and 17 hours i have left to live (statistically speaking of course, i hope to live much longer!) there is more chance of science proving the Leprachaun as a living entity than bf? pass me the knitting patterns, i need a new hobby I'm betting if you knit in the woods your chances go up by 50%....just guessing tho! LOL!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silver Fox Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 So if i get you right Mr Fox, in the 23 yrs, 7 months, 6 weeks, 3 days and 17 hours i have left to live (statistically speaking of course, i hope to live much longer!) there is more chance of science proving the Leprachaun as a living entity than bf? pass me the knitting patterns, i need a new hobby No, I think that BF exists and will be proven to exist before you die. I will in about 25 years also. Bigfootery is a valid scientific endeavor, and there are many good people, but there are also tons of scumbags, liars, frauds, crooks, sociopaths, narcissists, lunatics, etc. It's the nature of Bigfootery to attract such folks because of the unproven nature of the beast. This does not mean that Bigfootery is not science. It is. It's just science with a lot of baggage along for the ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted May 16, 2011 SSR Team Share Posted May 16, 2011 Here's thee Guy's BFRO Report.. Same Guy that took that Picture of the Face behind the Stump.. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=16598 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 Here's thee Guy's BFRO Report.. Same Guy that took that Picture of the Face behind the Stump.. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=16598 Thank's. The track looks interesting, and I trust the evaluation by the BFRO investigator because I know him personally. But the "stump" photos look fake. In the video by "trailriderresearch" Brisson explains that the creature left after peeking from behind the stump. Where are the pictures of the leaving Sasquatch? He could shoot two photos of the head but wasn't able to get a full-body pic of the leaving animal. Strange... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 This is apparently a statement by a British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club member concerning Brisson. It was posted by a user named "amcgirr" at Cryptomundo. I have posted the link to the page here earlier. "Hey all, Just wanted to mention that the BCSCC has had dealings with Randy Brisson in the past and found him to be dubious and untrustworthy. He led some of our researchers on a wild goose chase back in the summer at Golden Ears national park after claiming he experienced rock-throwing incidents that he thought were definite sasquatch activity. He would fall back behind the group, throw some rocks and then catch up and say something like “Wow did you guys see that?!†The photo itself is quite old, I recall discussing it back in August 2009 and we all agreed it was a crude photoshop job at best." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted May 16, 2011 SSR Team Share Posted May 16, 2011 Thank's. The track looks interesting, and I trust the evaluation by the BFRO investigator because I know him personally. But the "stump" photos look fake. In the video by "trailriderresearch" Brisson explains that the creature left after peeking from behind the stump. Where are the pictures of the leaving Sasquatch? He could shoot two photos of the head but wasn't able to get a full-body pic of the leaving animal. Strange... They do look fake, without a doubt.. I do think he was scared however & whatever we say about taking " the " Picture, it's easier said than done in that specific moment, he did say he was scared too.. I'm not making excuses for him, just saying it as i see it.. He may well be full of $&%*, i don't know.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bsruther Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 More news from the Erickson Project. Not good news in my opinion... read the comments on Cryptomundo. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/films/brisson-mcdonald.htm http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/brisson-bf2010/ Is another hoaxer involved in the Erickson Project? I'm confused...Is this just shenanigans, fabricated by an attention hound? It seems to me that the longer it takes Erickson to release his findings, the more that questionable Bigfooters will try to attach themselves to the project. If this kind of stuff keeps happening, the hard-line skeptics will have a feeding frenzy, when and if the evidence is finally released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cervelo Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 Nail hit firmly on head by bsruther! But it will be fun to watch, kinda like the Enoch thing but all full of "science and peer review" can't wait!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted May 16, 2011 SSR Team Share Posted May 16, 2011 (edited) This is apparently a statement by a British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club member concerning Brisson. It was posted by a user named "amcgirr" at Cryptomundo. I have posted the link to the page here earlier. "Hey all, Just wanted to mention that the BCSCC has had dealings with Randy Brisson in the past and found him to be dubious and untrustworthy. He led some of our researchers on a wild goose chase back in the summer at Golden Ears national park after claiming he experienced rock-throwing incidents that he thought were definite sasquatch activity. He would fall back behind the group, throw some rocks and then catch up and say something like “Wow did you guys see that?!†The photo itself is quite old, I recall discussing it back in August 2009 and we all agreed it was a crude photoshop job at best." Still can't find any link to this Randy Guy & the EP other than that You Tube Title & Canada.. Edit : This was addedd 3 weeks ago on that Channel ???? http://www.youtube.com/user/trailriderresearch#p/u/3/9FzGyjFNcwc & this seems to be another day out with Igor.. http://www.youtube.com/user/trailriderresearch#p/u/3/9FzGyjFNcwc Edited May 16, 2011 by BobbyO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vilnoori Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 (edited) Here is the West Coast Sasquatch's discussion of Randy Brisson and the rock throwing incident for those who are curious: http://grandcherokee...play&thread=489 I admit to being somewhat dismayed about Randy's involvement with Igor Bourtsev during his recent visit, and also with the Ericson Project if that is true. Even though there may be some genuine sasquatch activity and evidence involved, it seems that Randy might be one researcher who is tempted to provide fabricated evidence on demand to increase his own prestige as a researcher. And while Randy's area of research (which is well known and already outed) is a good one with a likely population of study subjects (Golden Ears Park, and Pitt Lake in BC, Canada) evidence brought out from there (I understand Igor found some good hair samples in his recent visit with Randy, that he will get DNA analyzed) the fact that he is distrusted by other researchers here in BC because of the above incident is going to be a real drawback. So go carefully folks, keep the skepticals on where Randy is involved. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater, though. It really is a top notch research area with many other sasquatch encounters occurring in times past and even now in hunter/fisherman/hiker encounters. Edited May 16, 2011 by vilnoori Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts