Guest gershake Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 Yeah, Robert Lindsay is our own dear Silver Fox.
Guest bsruther Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 Paulides added another blog about the DNA project, yesterday. http://www.nabigfootsearch.com/bigfootblog.html I wonder who he is referring to...hmmm
Guest Silver Fox Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 Paulides added another blog about the DNA project, yesterday. http://www.nabigfootsearch.com/bigfootblog.html I wonder who he is referring to...hmmm Richard Stubstad.
Guest Silver Fox Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 I saw this on cryptomundo today: http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/erickson-project-news/. http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/new-erickson-project-news-bigfoot-dna-project-using-two-dead-bigfoot-bodies-for-samples/ I don't know much about robert lindsay but a lot of people on cryptomundo seem skeptical about his writings. Robert Lindsay has a whole universe of haters out there and has for some time now. He gets tons of hate comments regularly on his site and even some hate mail. There's nothing to be done about it, and he's quite ok the way things are. Some folks just can't be accommodated. Once you get on the public eye, you'll have a ton of haters too. Goes with the territory.
Cisco Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 I think that Robert Lindsay adds a lot of excitement to this forum. After all, how many hypothetical threads can I read before losing my mind? What would you rather read; "Do Bigfoot use two or three fingers to pick berries?" or "Erickson Project using DNA from two dead Bigfoot bodies." Maybe it's just me, but I would rather read the more stimulating threads. Don't get me wrong; some of these topics are a bit boring but they also have educational value. Personally, I like to read the exciting stuff first.... To each his own. I'm grateful for Robert Lindsay and hope that he continues with his postings.
Guest Cervelo Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 I would say that as Human Beings, our Brains have developed somewhat since the origins of speech, which is close to 100,000 Years ago, to the origins of telepathy, which only dates back to the late 1800's. So why do we still speak today? Nature in my mind is wonderful in it's simplicity and logic. Telepathy would have been much easier and straight forward. No voice box, no language to learn ect. It's all very romantic. There's a voice in my head everyday but I'm pretty confident I know who it is
Guest Cervelo Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) Animals also have telepathy. Speech isn't always useful. Weren't there times you wished you could figure out what someone was thinking? Telepathy is probably a leftover from our more animal past. I think most of our psi abilities have gone out as we got more civilized, but back in the early days of man, before speech, I think we relied on psi a lot like animals do I'm sorry but I find your first statement absurd. Prove it and don't tell me to go do a bunch of research. I'm very confident you read it somewhere on the web! What am I thinking now? Edited June 28, 2011 by Cervelo
Guest Silver Fox Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Erickson Project DNA update: Latest news on when the peer review might be done is possibly in 1-2 months.
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Erickson Project DNA update: Latest news on when the peer review might be done is possibly in 1-2 months. Sasky, is this true?
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Take away the dash between the 1 and 2. My sources say 12 months - not 1 to 2.
bipedalist Posted June 29, 2011 BFF Patron Posted June 29, 2011 So, it's not even "buckle up" time yet......
southernyahoo Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 So, it's not even "buckle up" time yet...... I stay buckled up these days.
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Please read this. OMG, I've been saying that they had to have at least one body to be doing all of the tests with so much evidence garnered. I knew they had to have more than hair and scat FGS. I was fussed at because my posts stating "they must have a body" caused some of our members to be flooded with calls and emails off line! Yikes! It made sense to me then, and it makes sense to me now, they have a body or parts of a body.
Recommended Posts