Guest Fanofsquatch Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Erickson Project DNA update: Latest news on when the peer review might be done is possibly in 1-2 months. Might and possibly? 1-2 months give or take a year, so what you are saying is maybe sometime in the future there could possibly just maybe be some sort of result that we may or may not hear about. This is not an update.
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Take away the dash between the 1 and 2. My sources say 12 months - not 1 to 2. Oh Man! I keep hearing soon, then we hear a year, then soon again, Does anyone know anything for sure? I'm afraid of dying from old age *before* this stuff is revealed. Do we have any positive knowledge of how much longer before the big revealing? I hope it's sooner rather then later..
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 You flushed them out Susiq Yes, I did, didn't I? I'm not as dumb as I look
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 I stay buckled up these days. Amen to that southernyahoo! and alert too..
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 (edited) How do I keep doing double posts? I have no clue, and it keeps happening.. Edited June 29, 2011 by SweetSusiq
Cisco Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Erickson Project DNA update: Latest news on when the peer review might be done is possibly in 1-2 months. I was under the impression that it was coming out in the very near future. I could swear that I read that on one of these threads very recently?
Guest Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 I believe parn stated on another thread that " a little birdy told him that they would get a verdict by a journal this week". I'm not sure if that was a joke or not though
Cisco Posted June 30, 2011 Posted June 30, 2011 I believe parn stated on another thread that " a little birdy told him that they would get a verdict by a journal this week". I'm not sure if that was a joke or not though Yep, that's where I read it. Thanks for confirming this as I thought I was losing my mind!
Guest Posted June 30, 2011 Posted June 30, 2011 Yep, that's where I read it. Thanks for confirming this as I thought I was losing my mind! No problem! I think the pace that this project is going is making a lot of us lose our minds!
bipedalist Posted June 30, 2011 BFF Patron Posted June 30, 2011 How do I keep doing double posts? I have no clue, and it keeps happening.. We have insight into what is happening, it has been documented/reported, investigated and the report turned over to CFZ technicians to be addressed.
Guest Posted June 30, 2011 Posted June 30, 2011 Would someone kindly clarify something for me. I know that OP, Mr. Paulides, Ericksen, and other groups and individuals all submitted evidence to Dr. Ketchum for testing. I know that all participants most likely signed NDA, however if some of these samples were paid for by private financing, which I am assuming Mr. Paulides group did, will all the results be revealed at the same time or will those that were paid for by private financing receive their results and be able to publicly release them. Mr. Ericksen has at times released several trailers, public statements to the effect that proof is imminent and years have gone by. Will the results be contingent on one person/groups agreement with Dr. Ketchum, or does Dr. Ketchum control the release of all results irregardless of who paid the bill. Thanks for helping me understand the dynamics of who's got what and who's got the power.
Guest Posted June 30, 2011 Posted June 30, 2011 We have insight into what is happening, it has been documented/reported, investigated and the report turned over to CFZ technicians to be addressed. Thank you so very much. It's becoming embarrassing..
Guest Carl Posted July 1, 2011 Posted July 1, 2011 (edited) Maybe they can make a short video explaing some things without spoiling anything. Just something to keep us interested and stuff, you know? IDK about everyone else but my anxiousness for this documentary is turning to restlessness everyday that passes with nothing new. It kinda stinks. Edited July 1, 2011 by Carl
Guest COGrizzly Posted July 1, 2011 Posted July 1, 2011 (edited) Ok - Here's my question - So all this stupid waiting on DNA BS, but probably with no body. Still suppose to be "groundbreaking". It's been YEARS, right? Don't the major players in this run the risk of DYING before the release? Edited July 1, 2011 by COGrizzly
Guest Posted July 1, 2011 Posted July 1, 2011 Ok - Here's my question - So all this stupid waiting on DNA BS, but probably with no body. Still suppose to be "groundbreaking". It's been YEARS, right? Don't the major players in this run the risk of DYING before the release? :lol:
Recommended Posts