New Film Shown at South by South West "Capturing Bigfoot"

[VAfooter]

Here is the PGF section link:

 

 

On 3/14/2026 at 10:34 PM, Explorer said:

That quote is exactly what Joshua Kitakaze posted on the Facebook page for Coalition for Critical Thinking in Bigfoot thinking.

 

For newer members, Kit was a long time and strongly anti-PGF skeptic on here some time back. His postings can still be found in the PGF section if anyone is interested in his comments. I saw those comments a few days ago when all of this broke. I guess he is still around...

 

 

On 3/13/2026 at 10:22 AM, Skinwalker13 said:

Does anyone know someone that was in attendance? Any ideas how the community is going to react?

 

Welcome back SW! Supposedly, Bill Munns has seen it, but I do not know that to be a fact. I am very interested in his opinion of this.

[Backdoc]

If I had a Bigfoot movie with my friends back in my youth (1970's ) any bigfoot would look like footage from the PGF in the following sense:

 

-Any footage would have a Bigfoot subject.

 

-The camera would come on to the subject.

 

-Unless the video was designed to have bigfoot attack the cameraman, the Bigfoot would walk away or run away.   

 

-The setting would be in some sort of outdoors, probably wooded area. 

 

That generic happening would be common in nearly any bigfoot video.   It wouldn't make it "Trial Run" or anything else.  

 

This reminds me of the Roger Patterson drawing appearing in Roger's book PRIOR TO the PGF event.  It didn't signal a pre-PGF tell, it was just a drawing inspired largely from other reports.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[jameskrav]

I posted on another thread about this that Bill Munns opines that the new found footage was Al trying to convince himself that Roger's PGF was not itself a hoax (since Al was going to take it on tour and was worried he'd be at risk of fraud).  My head was spinning at that explanation.  If the new footage has the 'subject' doing Patty things (lifing it's foot to 90 degrees, etc), has breasts , and has a similar head (the most important), then it's pretty much done.  Why Roger would wait a year (being constantly poor) to film the cash cow makes no sense to me however.  That the film was in the possession of someone who worked at Boeing (they had a film lab) may finally explain how the PGF was developed so covertly.  

Edited 19 hours ago by jameskrav

[Incorrigible1]

A great deal of rumors, innuendo, and supposition being put forth about what people "hear, imagine, and think" what's revealed in the "new" documentary. 

 

Has anyone personally actually viewed this documentary?

 

Buehler, Buehler?

[VAfooter]

On 3/17/2026 at 2:15 PM, norseman said:

I am not a huge fan of Money maker. But I think he is right, it comes down to the suit.

 

Same here. I could not read the entire thing since I do not do FB, but what I did read was on target in my opinion.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Incorrigible1 said:

Has anyone personally actually viewed this documentary?

 

Unless they were at SXSW, I doubt it. Guessing at some point in the not too distant future, it will start appearing on streaming services.

[Skinwalker13]

4 hours ago, Incorrigible1 said:

A great deal of rumors, innuendo, and supposition being put forth about what people "hear, imagine, and think" what's revealed in the "new" documentary. 

 

Has anyone personally actually viewed this documentary?

 

Buehler, Buehler?

Hairymanroad, a YouTuber, went to SXSW to watch the second screening. Based off of his, and one other individual who went to a screening from the BF community the 40sec of 1966 film, in the words of Jeff Meldrum, "looked like a test run". Then goes on to describe how "it was "patty" but slightly different, a different guy in the suit. The lines were all the same."

 

It's not looking great guys. Steenberg, and small handful of others, seem to have been told the same message from Meldrum starting in April of 25. "Something big is coming in relation to the PG-film".

3 hours ago, VAfooter said:

 

Same here. I could not read the entire thing since I do not do FB, but what I did read was on target in my opinion.

 

 

 

 

Unless they were at SXSW, I doubt it. Guessing at some point in the not too distant future, it will start appearing on streaming services.

I want to see the film too, they are shopping around for a market release but according to the director they have two more film festivals to attend before anything like that will happen. 

[Skinwalker13]

6 hours ago, VAfooter said:

 

Welcome back SW! Supposedly, Bill Munns has seen it, but I do not know that to be a fact. I am very interested in his opinion of this.

Bill has seen the footage, apparently he's in the documentary as well. He shared his opinion on a podcast this week but it takes over an hour of Tom Clancy like details to get to his opinion. Which was essentially he thinks that it has no legs to stand on. I don't think he is able to sperate himself from his work on the PG film to review this footage objectively. I could be wrong but it didn't come across that way in his interview. 

[VAfooter]

As always, everyone will have to make their own evaluation. No doubt, this new documentary is going to be scrutinized as much or more than the PGF itself, at least for the next few months, or at least until it is absolutely proven right or wrong, one way or the other...

 

Obviously, the key evidence is going to be the found film and whether experts, both sympathetic and hostile, and others can actually examine it for themselves (not counting on that to happen). Even then, we may not get a undisputable answer.

[Incorrigible1]

11 hours ago, Skinwalker13 said:

Hairymanroad, a YouTuber, went to SXSW to watch the second screening. Based off of his, and one other individual who went to a screening from the BF community the 40sec of 1966 film, in the words of Jeff Meldrum, "looked like a test run". Then goes on to describe how "it was "patty" but slightly different, a different guy in the suit. The lines were all the same."

 

It's not looking great guys. Steenberg, and small handful of others, seem to have been told the same message from Meldrum starting in April of 25. "Something big is coming in relation to the PG-film".

I want to see the film too, they are shopping around for a market release but according to the director they have two more film festivals to attend before anything like that will happen. 

 

The dude jumped so many conclusions that he had to duck hitting the moon.

[jameskrav]

Meldrum is on a podcast dated May 3rd and there's no mention of the new footage or wavering of opinion about the PGF.  I dont know how long it takes to go from 'finished podcast to uploaded to YT', but if he's telling people in April that big things are coming, yet makes no mention of it on a May 3rd podcast, that's confusing.  When did Meldrum see the footage (on a projector I hope) ?  Some obnoxious poster (the guy who insists the helmet is the Wu Chang mask or something like that) says Meldrum saw the footage 2 years ago.  I hope this new footage is going to show what has long been rumored at:  Roger did have a suit for playing around with.  Unless the suit matches Patty very well, it's a nothing burger.  But if it does, then its hard to escape the conclusion.

[Sircalum]

 

The end of Patty 😢 

[Incorrigible1]

1 hour ago, Sircalum said:

 

The end of Patty 😢