Huntster Posted Sunday at 01:14 PM Posted Sunday at 01:14 PM If government will go to these lengths to protect certain trees (especially just maintaining the secrecy/remoteness strategies), would they do likewise to protect a rare human sub-species? I think so............ 1
georgerm Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago (edited) On 9/19/2026 at 4:55 PM, norseman said: I don't even insist on one. But I don't write the rules. But once discovery happens I would be for the most rigid protection for the species. Harming one would be a hanging offense in my book. Yes, protecting the bigfoot species in national forest is a 'must do' but when we look at how many acres bigfoot inhabits, effective protection could start the civil war over again between environmentalist and industrialist. How do we protect a rare primate species that probably lives and hunts in every remote forest with roads or no roads throughout the United States? 193 million acres of grazing land and forest is managed by the forest service, and 58 million acres is managed by the Bureau of Land Management and bigfoot probably has lived and hunted is many of those acres. Once bigfoot becomes a proven species, adequate protection may include fewer hunting permits and drastically reduced logging will be the fuse to dynamite that starts a new civil war. Do you remember the problems caused by the Spotted Owl? Will the industrialist win out and continue to rule over bigfoot's habitat? Once a live or dead bigfoot is brought in and recognized as a new species, this environmental conflict will probably start. The Forest Service and BLM won't be defining bigfoot as a mythical creature anymore and then what happens? Edited 10 hours ago by georgerm
Huntster Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 hours ago, georgerm said: ........... How do we protect a rare primate species that probably lives and hunts in every remote forest with roads or no roads throughout the United States?.......... 1) Support behaviors and beliefs that makes as many people as possible believe the species to be mythical. 2) Limit access to areas where the species has its densest populations. 3) Don't discuss the issue officially, and if it comes up, ridicule it and remember Point #1. 4) Do not fund any research into the existence of said species. 1
georgerm Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Huntster said: 1) Support behaviors and beliefs that makes as many people as possible believe the species to be mythical. 2) Limit access to areas where the species has its densest populations. 3) Don't discuss the issue officially, and if it comes up, ridicule it and remember Point #1. 4) Do not fund any resarch into the existence of said species. Oh you forgot a goal Huntster which is if bigfoot is regularly reported in a particular part of the forest then allow more timber sales and logging so the area can be heavily logged which requires new roads. Remember bigfoot is a mythical creature that doesn't need biological studies and reports.
Huntster Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago 1 hour ago, georgerm said: ..........if bigfoot is regularly reported in a particular part of the forest then allow more timber sales and logging so the area can be heavily logged which requires new roads.......... The opposite happened in the Bluff Creek area of Six Rivers National Forest where the PGF was shot. Now, in winter when Bigfoot tracks can most easily be found, the area is closed "to prevent the spread of Phytophthora lateralis, a non-native pathogen that causes Port-Orford-cedar root disease. See my point #2: Quote .........2) Limit access to areas where the species has its densest populations...........
Recommended Posts