Bigfoot myth or monster?

[xspider1]

^ I think Huntster may be referring to the teeth and mandibles attributed to Gigantopithecus, georgerm.  (If not, he will probably correct me soon.)    

 

I watched the video you linked regarding the Bulga Sphere, Huntster.  Interestingly, that is apparently about the same size and shape, and it moves similar to what I saw fly past me about 35 years ago, except the object I saw appeared almost to be on fire with orange flames.  Maybe the tiny Alien craft I saw travelled a million+ light-years but then traffic on Earth was just too much for them..   That is really a topic for a different forum, I guess.  I didn't mean to detract from this interesting topic because we have plenty to argue about discuss regarding our favorite giant human-apes.

 

1 hour ago, Huntster said:

"Discovery" is a sham. All it is is permission for the masses to accept what many of us already know to be true.

 

What do many of us already know?  There are many witnesses to Bigfoot and I absolutely believe that they saw exactly what they describe but; what do they even know for sure?  Near death experiences are fascinating too, but again, no 'required proof' for Science.  

 

I use the character: ' (open quote) not to upset anybody, but to indicate that the words contained within were said in some context, Norseman.  You said, and I quote verbatim:

"Science will require one male and one female type specimen. It’s required for every extant species on the planet."  I asked you to reference that specifically which, you did not.  Instead, you want me to show your statement not to be true?  Even Science cannot prove a negative using only logic.  Your statement could only be proven false by testing which, as of now, cannot be done either.

Edited 11 hours ago by xspider1

[Huntster]

1 hour ago, georgerm said:

Where did you find that we had a fossil record of bigfoot?.........

 

There are fossil records of all kinds of hominins, including very large ones like sasquatches such as Gigantopithecus.

 

Quote

..........What do you think the buga sphere's purpose is?

 

It's clearly some kind of drone. Whether it's extraterrestrial or not, I don't know.

[Huntster]

41 minutes ago, xspider1 said:

.........What do many of us already know?  There are many witnesses to Bigfoot and I absolutely believe that they saw exactly what they describe but; what do they even know for sure?..........

 

Those who have seen <adjective> evidence for themselves know that sasquatches exist. They might not know exactly what they are or how Science would/will taxonomically categorize them, but "discovery" is a done deal for them. 

[xspider1]

2 hours ago, Huntster said:

Those who have seen <adjective> evidence for themselves know that sasquatches exist. They might not know exactly what they are or how Science would/will taxonomically categorize them, but "discovery" is a done deal for them. 

 

True, I have always said something similar myself.  But discovery probably leaves eye-witnesses with even more questions than anyone else.  I would imagine that Bigfoot witnesses who have no doubt in their (sane) minds that they saw exactly what is described as Bigfoot might wonder more than anyone else, why and how Bigfoot can elude Scientific description.  Such is apparently just the case with our Forest Giants.  That is exactly what makes me think that something funny is definitely going on.  I see no way for them to be just extraordinary, yet other-wise normal, animals.

[MIB]

7 hours ago, xspider1 said:

I see no way for them to be just extraordinary, yet other-wise normal, animals.

 

I've pondered this as well.   There is, however, one (somewhat humiliating) option .. maybe, rather than them being "magic", we're just more inept than we give ourselves credit for.