Huntster Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Will said: .........I disagree because they can’t be contained and are found everywhere. If all information is fair game, then industry would be able to prove that modern human living and activities don’t seem to affect them. If they can be found in the dumpster just like the raccoon there isn’t much protection needed......... True, but you can expect "migration routes" to and from "intensively critical range" to be identified and managed, and the "intensively critical range" to be "intensively" managed. The migratory routes come later.............
Will Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Huntster said: True, but you can expect "migration routes" to and from "intensively critical range" to be identified and managed, and the "intensively critical range" to be "intensively" managed. The migratory routes come later............. where is the intensively critical range? Migration routes? No one can identify any of that. There could actually be more bigfeet on private property than on public ground. Human activity doesn’t seem to sway them one way or another.
Huntster Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Will said: where is the intensively critical range? Migration routes? No one can identify any of that......... They can identify all that over time. Sasquatch researchers already understand much of that just by analyzing sighings and footprint reports. Quote .........There could actually be more bigfeet on private property than on public ground.......... Agreed, and that, too, is already understood, especially with regard to large timber industry lands. There is already cooperation between private landowners and sasquatch researchers going on. Quote ........Human activity doesn’t seem to sway them one way or another. Human activity affects even human activity. People don't fish in industrial waste ponds or recreate in war zones.
Will Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 46 minutes ago, Huntster said: Once discovery cannot be denied, you can expect a pair or more of sasquatrches to be held captive and "studied" in every way imaginable. They’re going to capture and study every way imaginable a newly discovered hominid…..hominin, that we are to assign rights, a language and land too? Edited 4 hours ago by Will
Huntster Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Will said: They’re going to capture and study every way imaginable a newly discovered hominid….. If they exist, and if "discovered" (ie, all of mankind comes to accept as truly existing), then yes, we can safely assume that government(s) will capture and study them in every way imaginable.
Huntster Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Will said: …..hominin, that we are to assign rights, a language and land too? Yes, if they are determined to be hominin, ie another species of humans like Neanderthal, Denisovan, or Floresiensis, there will be those who will fight legally to see that their human rights are recognized legally. I doubt that sasquatches will be granted land like aboriginal people are, but I'm confident that government landowners will manage government lands with sasquatch rights as a new factor of consideration. A language can't be "assigned". It either exists or it doesn't.
Will Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Huntster said: A language can't be "assigned". It either exists or it doesn't. Well, that’s gonna be very interesting trying to figure out the language of this animal.
Will Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Huntster said: If they exist, and if "discovered" (ie, all of mankind comes to accept as truly existing), then yes, we can safely assume that government(s) will capture and study them in every way imaginable. If they are an animal I would agree. If were to give them rights, they would be studied under duress in captivity. Will they be able to sue after, will rights have been violated?
norseman Posted 2 hours ago Admin Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, Huntster said: Once discovery cannot be denied, you can expect a pair or more of sasquatrches to be held captive and "studied" in every way imaginable. That’s probably already happened. 1
norseman Posted 2 hours ago Admin Posted 2 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Will said: Well, that’s gonna be very interesting trying to figure out the language of this animal. Gorillas, Chimps and Orangs have all been taught sign language. Once that is established? If it’s an ancient human with vocal cords? It will go fairly quickly.
Will Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 23 minutes ago, norseman said: That’s probably already happened. Will the “authorities” be able to admit that?
Huntster Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 47 minutes ago, Will said: If they are an animal I would agree. If were to give them rights, they would be studied under duress in captivity. Will they be able to sue after, will rights have been violated? They won't have to sue. There are plenty of people who will sue for them. And, again, that is an example of why government doesn't want to go there. 39 minutes ago, norseman said: That’s probably already happened. I suspect you are correct. 15 minutes ago, Will said: Will the “authorities” be able to admit that? They are almost certainly not wanting to do that.
norseman Posted 1 hour ago Admin Posted 1 hour ago 49 minutes ago, Will said: Will the “authorities” be able to admit that? No. Hence the nutshell game. I think they had the bones by the 1800s. Watching all the Giant conspiracies like Lovelock caves and others. Amateurs were sending giant bones to the Smithsonian. The Smithsonian says they never got them. But the Smithsonian is exempt from the Indian Graves Act and cannot be audited. It’s essentially a archeological skunk works. By now? With their tech? They undoubtedly have much more than just bones.
Will Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago 27 minutes ago, norseman said: No. Hence the nutshell game. I think they had the bones by the 1800s. Watching all the Giant conspiracies like Lovelock caves and others. Amateurs were sending giant bones to the Smithsonian. The Smithsonian says they never got them. But the Smithsonian is exempt from the Indian Graves Act and cannot be audited. It’s essentially a archeological skunk works. By now? With their tech? They undoubtedly have much more than just bones. I think Mount Saint Helens had to be a big one for them. But like you, I think they’ve had them long before that. 1 hour ago, Huntster said: They won't have to sue. There are plenty of people who will sue for them. And, again, that is an example of why government doesn't want to go there. I suspect you are correct. They are almost certainly not wanting to do that. Yep agreed.
Recommended Posts