Huntster Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Will said: .........I disagree because they can’t be contained and are found everywhere. If all information is fair game, then industry would be able to prove that modern human living and activities don’t seem to affect them. If they can be found in the dumpster just like the raccoon there isn’t much protection needed......... True, but you can expect "migration routes" to and from "intensively critical range" to be identified and managed, and the "intensively critical range" to be "intensively" managed. The migratory routes come later.............
Will Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, Huntster said: True, but you can expect "migration routes" to and from "intensively critical range" to be identified and managed, and the "intensively critical range" to be "intensively" managed. The migratory routes come later............. where is the intensively critical range? Migration routes? No one can identify any of that. There could actually be more bigfeet on private property than on public ground. Human activity doesn’t seem to sway them one way or another.
Huntster Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Will said: where is the intensively critical range? Migration routes? No one can identify any of that......... They can identify all that over time. Sasquatch researchers already understand much of that just by analyzing sighings and footprint reports. Quote .........There could actually be more bigfeet on private property than on public ground.......... Agreed, and that, too, is already understood, especially with regard to large timber industry lands. There is already cooperation between private landowners and sasquatch researchers going on. Quote ........Human activity doesn’t seem to sway them one way or another. Human activity affects even human activity. People don't fish in industrial waste ponds or recreate in war zones.
Recommended Posts