Guest Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 If someone was designing a suit, what could be the reason to have the breasts so low on the chest? I suppose it could be because they were copyinga sketch or maybe to hide a closure, but that seems to me to be a trait of an older animal rather than a purposely added design. Maybe Patty walked away because she was feeling a little stiff from old age. Just a little late night speculating. It has always been my theory that Patty was and may still be of an advanced age. You can see it in the posture and the nonchalant manner in which she leaves the scene. It is like she is thinking "I've been around to long to get all excited and take off running from some humans". I believe her look was explained by Patterson as one of disdain or disgust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest colobus Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 There really needn't be any great mystery regarding these frames showing the back of the leg. Among the great apes, and especially some types of gorilla, there can be individuals with irregular hair "tufts" along the backs of their legs. When askew these tufts can, in the right light, give the illusion of odd anatomy; but that's what it is - an illusion. I don't claim to be able to say what is in the film in those frames, but I will say there are direct parallels with known apes, and no creature suit need be responsible. Hopefully the photos I'm attaching will give others a sense of what hair patterns I'm referring to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted April 26, 2008 Author Share Posted April 26, 2008 Colobus: Thanks for the reference photos. excellent references of varied hair patterns naturally occuring. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mediumfoot Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 " I believe her look was explained by Patterson as one of disdain or disgust." doh was totaly unaware of this description from RP. how could i have missed that? where can it be found? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sasquatcher Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Not in 1967. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest batman009 Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) Thanks for sharing the heads up! simulation assurance vie Edited June 4, 2009 by batman009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoot Hunter65 Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 I recently came across someone while posting on Youtube that shared what seems to be very convincing evidence that the PG film was faked. he provided a lot of information that, if true, totally proves that the film was indeed a fake. He forwarded me a lot of evdence - I have not verified it's authenticity - but I thought it was interesting. How can I get this information to someone to look at? (This information may already be know about - I don't know!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted July 23, 2009 BFF Patron Share Posted July 23, 2009 What form of media is it, pictures, documents, video, or other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 If someone had very convincing evidence that the PGF was fake I think they would be shouting it from the rooftops. Grain of salt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts