Guest Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Here is a pretty good report of a white Sasquatch. I guess he might have thought the witness' white horse was one of them. After getting closer he saw otherwise and dipped out. It could show that white ones may not necessarily be uncommon among them. Relatively speaking of course since just about any bigfoot is quite uncommon. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=2787 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 since gorillas get a whitish greyish color over part of they're body, why not squach? all the people I've met who've seen them saw black, brown or red ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 The fellow who cohosts or hosts (?) the blogtalk radio show Bigfoot Tonight, which I think is certainly one of the better of these kinds of shows, had his first sighting in Ohio of an all white bigfoot. They come in many colors. If a person can have a certain natural shade of hair, you can pretty much take it for granted bigfoot come in that color, too. And stripes and spots sometimes, but I think they might use some kind of paint or such thing. Mud, something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 (edited) German shepherd dogs have a recessive white gene that discounts them from dog shows. Beautiful GSD Edited March 29, 2012 by dopeyj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Always thought this map of reported Albino/White BF sightings was pretty cool.... Here is an corresponding *key* that notes the years and counties... • ALABAMA LIMESTONE 451 AUGUST 20 1993 • ALABAMA ST. CLAIR 8679 OCTOBER 1986 • ARIZONA GILA 23358 NOVEMBER 17 2006 • ARKANSAS DESHA 8913 MAY 2001 • ARKANSAS LITTLE RIVER AUGUST 1944 • CALIFORNIA MONTEREY 5463 FEBRUARY 16 2002 • CALIFORNIA SISKIYOU 2896 AUGUST 1944 • COLORADO BOULDER 15273 AUGUST 1964 • COLORADO JEFFERSON 7225 SEPTEMBER 1978 • COLORADO PUEBLO 1371 DECEMBER 1982 • COLORADO SUMMIT 15588 1960s SUMMER • ILLINOIS SANGAMON 15251 1995 WINTER • IOWA MARION 511 OCTOBER 24 2000 • KANSAS SUMNER 7709 MARCH 2003 • KENTUCKY MASON 2425 OCTOBER 7 1980 • KENTUCKY MASON 2426 NOVEMBER 5 1980 • KENTUCKY BELL 2364 1950s • KENTUCKY BOONE 24800 1994 • KENTUCKY FLEMING OCTOBER 11 1980 • KENTUCKY JACKSON 24131 DECEMBER 22 2006 • KENTUCKY MADISON 2428 1973 • MICHIGAN BARAGA 23929 SEPTEMBER 1970 • MICHIGAN MARQUETTE 2787 AUGUST 1991 • MICHIGAN SANILAC 815 AUGUST 1987 • MINNESOTA PINE 3801 AUGUST 1972 • MISSISSIPPI BOLIVAR 8732 JANUARY 1998 • MISSISSIPPI LOWNDES 1344 1968 • MISSOURI BARRY 9840 NOVEMBER 18 2004 • MONTANA RICHLAND 1695 1979-1980 • NEW YORK MONROE 1525 OCTOBER 1997 • NEW YORK PUTNAM 11841 AUGUST 21 1980 • NEW YORK WARREN 3298 OCTOBER 1992 • NORTH CAROLINA YADKIN 3439 1971/1972 FALL • OHIO JEFFERSON 4952 1988 WINTER • OHIO ATHENS 4409 NOVEMBER 2001 • OHIO DELAWARE 878 AUGUST 1989 • OHIO FRANKLIN 14646 MAY 1986-1987 • OHIO GEAUGA 3248 MARCH 2001 • OHIO GUERNSEY 4558 OCTOBER 15 1998 • OHIO GUERNSEY 8042 OCTOBER 1996 • OHIO PIKE 5977 MAY 2000 • OKLAHOMA HUGHES 5817 1976-1980 SUMMER • OKLAHOMA COMANCHE 10234 JANUARY 2005 • OKLAHOMA LATIMER 8678 • PENNSYLVANIA ALLEGHENY 105 SEPTEMBER 1997 SOUTH CAROLINA PICKENS 16962 1981 SUMMER • SOUTH CAROLINA DARLINGTON 14154 MARCH 13 2006 • TENNESSEE LINCOLN 6638 JULY 16 2003 • UTAH GARFIELD 2115 MAY 19 1994 • VERMONT CHITTENDEN 1178 NOVEMBER 1984 • WASHINGTON GRAYS HARBOR 1225 JULY 1997 • WASHINGTON OKANOGAN 10974 MARCH 1987 • WASHINGTON LEWIS 4380 1994 SUMMER • WASHINGTON PIERCE 1730 OCTOBER 13 1975 Shows a pretty distinct number of sightings in Kentucky and Ohio. Bummed that Georgia has none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KentuckyApeman Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 I wonder if these white BF's seem to just 'disappear' during the snowy winter months? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted April 4, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted April 4, 2012 (edited) Different colored BF, such as white colored, is one thing. Albino BF are something very different entirely. Worldwide we're talking about approximately 1 in every 17,000 people being albino. So given those figures, if you ask me, i'd say that the chances of coming accross an albino BF are probably non existent. Edit : You must remember that we all have white hair one day if we live that long, including BF's. We don't all however have a partial absence of pigment in our skin, that's very different. Edited April 4, 2012 by BobbyO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigantor Posted April 4, 2012 Admin Share Posted April 4, 2012 That's true, there may not even be 10k BF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted April 5, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted April 5, 2012 Exactly G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 CTS, I live in a spot that (I think) happens to be close to one of their trails. They watched us awhile & decided that we weren't a danger to them, so I was able to see them quite a bit for a few years. After I started trying to get pictures & video, they got a lot harder to see, but I still catch a glimpse occasionally & hear them going past every day. The problem is that my observations don't always agree very well with the "Standard Known Bigfoot Facts". It incenses & exasperates skeptics & proponents equally, thereby causing trouble. Sasfooty - please take a look at the proposed Report Classification Scheme - under Field Methods - BFF and tell us if you could use the variables listed there to encode some of the observations you have made/reported. If not, please tell us what we need to add. You input is important to us. Thanks RE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spurfoot Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 There is a difference between absence of pigment and pigment that is white. Absence of pigment is what is generally what is meant by albino. Pigment that is white could be a mutated form of a different color pigment. Therefore gigantor's comments are not necessarily correct although they could be. Therefore no conclusion on statistics. I continue to find sasfooty's observations convincing and intriguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 I went pre-maturity grey. I started turning grey at 18 and was almost completely grey by 30. My hair looks white. Going grey early might be an explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spurfoot Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 bigfootnis, People of Celtic heritage seem to go grey at an early age. This is a widely mentioned observation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted April 12, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted April 12, 2012 I'm not sure about that. I know plenty of Scots and Irishmen ( that's real Scotsmen/Irish by the way, not Scotsmen/Irish because their great Grandfather was Scottish ) and barely none are grey & many are well into their 40's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 I went pre-maturity grey. I started turning grey at 18 and was almost completely grey by 30. My hair looks white. Going grey early might be an explanation. At least you still seem to have hair on your head. Heck, I wouldn't care if mine were white. But darned if mine isn't falling out on the top of my head. No grey at all and I'll hit 50 next month. But I only have hair on the sides and back of my head. I gave up on it and keep it sheared really close. Not *shaved* but *sheared* mind you. The Report Classification System that gigantor came up with and coded himself is really cool. Since member Sasfooty seems/claims to have persistently ongoing BF activity around her residence I'd also like for her to look at using The Report Classification System. But she probably won't be able to do so unless she joins the PMP. Can't say with any measure of sincerity that I find her claims convincing. But I can say that I find them intriguing and worthy of further explanation. I'm pretty sure the *Report Classification System* has been added to our Premium Membership plan. And, I'm pretty sure that we'll use this unique system to integrate with an *interactive* sightings/witness report database for Premium Members to read, enjoy, and discuss within the PMP area in the not so distant future. Premium Membership only costs $20.00 per year and there is an awful lot of bang for the buck in joining the Premium Membership Plan. Those of you who have already joined have some really cool things to look forward too on top of what you already receive as PMP members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts