Guest SquatchinNY Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 MNBF...those howls haunt me. They are creepy. PS-Check your PMs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Lights Posted December 3, 2012 Author Share Posted December 3, 2012 Andy...you are Andy Peeper, right? From Finding Bigfoot? Confirmed. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2012/01/listen-to-andy-piepers-interview-with.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I still don't recommend getting too confident about these recordings. When the speed is adjusted to the normal frequency of a coyote or wolf call the length of the call also falls in line with that known (3 to 4 seconds). Additionally, when you look at the spectrogram of the canidvoices file (posted earlier)below, you'll see some commonality in the resonance shift from the first formant to the second at the end of the calls. The MinnHowl is the fourth call from the left. It is not uncommon to see the second formant weaker than the first and third. This is what changes our perception of the vowel in a vocalization and is very involved in the perception of speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SquatchinNY Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 SY: The recordings were not slowed down. I explained why earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 So you are vouching for the provenance this recording now? You don't think someone could be testing us here? We just had a big debacle over some tracks, very clever. I don't want to accuse people but my skepticals aren't coming off on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Maggie Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Very interesting.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts