Guest thermalman Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) BLAST away TH, you and "Supreme Ruler of the Galaxy" have nothing. Your evidence is so falliable, that the Titanic has a better chance of staying afloat! ( And yes, that's the real name of a real ship.) Edited March 11, 2013 by thermalman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbhunter Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Moderator's statement; In reviewing the back and forths here, this thread is digressing into a shoving contest and that needs to stop. I see some are talking in both the Tar Pit and here, but this level of posting needs to be there period. DON'T go back and forth and keep the topic ON TOPIC PLEASE!! There will be no more warnings! The OPEN FORUM is not the place. Thank you, KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) Deleted per mod request as I was hitting enter. Edited March 11, 2013 by leisureclass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) Just read the mod statement too....... Okey dokey. Okay, so where are we with this "paper"? Has anyone found anything redeeming about it yet? Or is the raw data the one thing necessary to pull this from the ashes? Edited March 11, 2013 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 BLAST away TH, you and "Supreme Ruler of the Galaxy" have nothing. Your evidence is so falliable, that the Titanic has a better chance of staying afloat! ( And yes, that's the real name of a real ship.) I am really confused. How is their evidence fallable? I have yet to see a scientific response to it. Is that forthcoming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbhunter Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Thanks Melissa and Leisureclass~~ KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 You're welcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thermalman Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Missed your previous post and agreed KB. Just trying to compare truth to truth. Not truth to innuendo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbhunter Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 I understand TM, just trying to keep this on track. Thanks, KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Just in case my question was lost: Okay, so where are we with this "paper"? Has anyone found anything redeeming about it yet? Or is the raw data the one thing necessary to pull this from the ashes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Just in case my question was lost: Okay, so where are we with this "paper"? Has anyone found anything redeeming about it yet? Or is the raw data the one thing necessary to pull this from the ashes? I think the raw data will be necessary to even attempt to rescue this paper. I don't know if that's possible, but that's probably the only shot MK's got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thermalman Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Time will tell folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest poignant Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 And after all that huffing and puffing, not a single bigfoot was proven. Makes you wonder if bigfooters could rally and TRY to pull on the same rope, in the same direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scout1959 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 And after all that huffing and puffing, not a single bigfoot was proven. Makes you wonder if bigfooters could rally and TRY to pull on the same rope, in the same direction. What kind of pipe dream is this ^^^ LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 I think the raw data will be necessary to even attempt to rescue this paper. I don't know if that's possible, but that's probably the only shot MK's got. I was afraid someone might say that. But, I have to say I agree. And after all that huffing and puffing, not a single bigfoot was proven. Makes you wonder if bigfooters could rally and TRY to pull on the same rope, in the same direction. You know what Poignant - I think this community could "rally" - but we need someone to give us something to "rally" around. I wanted to - and I am trying to find a reason to rally around this - but I just can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts