Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 So this is gonna morph into another Dyer thread? LOL. Another thread bites the dust.
Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Countdown to thread hijack then closure... I give it no more than a few hours. The way its headed right now, no it wont be open much longer...... If you folks want to discuss why "any" bigfoot would / would not eat food nailed to a tree- fine. Go down the Dyer path again, and this thread will quickly be closed and deleted. We've gone on record several times with this- if there's some news or new development, we'll consider allowing it to be discussed. We will NOT be having 500 page threads where people just rip each other apart over NONSENSE...... Consider this your one warning... This is an official staff statement- do not respond to it in thread. If you have a problem or question, you're more than welcome to PM myself or another member of staff. Art
Guest LarryP Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Texas produces great food.........it has not produce a bigfoot body......I am surprised some have yet to see through Dyers lies Louisiana produces great food. Texas produces oil and lots of Texans who incorrectly think that everything's bigger and better in Texas.
Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Have you guys ever wondered if a sasquatch would prefer cooked ribs over raw. I'm sure they would eat either, but which do you think they would prefer. Also...If I nail the kitchen trash to a tree, will my husband take it out? ( A little humor folks...don't shoot me! lol )
WRabbit Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 If I nail the kitchen trash to a tree, will my husband take it out? You've done the job for him. You have to take it out to nail it to a tree. As for raw vs cooked ribs, I know how I prefer them.
Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 I think the fact that the food was attached to a tree as opposed to a post is significant. It was the tree that gave the Sasquatch the trust, as we all know that Sasquatch love and need trees. They are an essential part of their existence. The tree maybe allowed the Bigfoot to trust the source of the food. But having said that, there was also reports that this same Sasquatch was seen dragging road kill from the side of the road which leads you to wonder whether if this particular Squatch was somewhat landlocked, then food sources were scarce?
Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Na...there's a palm tree right next to my front door.
Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 I really don't think a Sasquatch would eat processed food. Additionally the ribs would have been touched by human hands. Many animals have a strong sense of smell. Unless it was hungry and only cared about food which made it less focused on the surroundings. But I would think a bigfoot would not eat something nailed to a tree it's out of the norm for them.
Guest Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 (edited) I don't know joey. I've heard a lot about bigfoot digging in dumpsters. I remember one in oklahoma left a greasy handprint on the dumpster behind a catfish house. They also collected a hair sample from the barbwire fence leading back into the forest. Edited March 16, 2013 by simplyskyla
LeafTalker Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 There are also stories about Sasquatch (and/or maybe big cats) leaving parts of their kills in trees, presumably to keep those parts away from other carnivores.
Guest DWA Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 Definitely big cats (leopards do it frequently). And there are numerous NA reports of similar stashes...even though no known NA animal is known to do it.
roguefooter Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 But seriously Ribs from Wal-Mart? Packaged and processed meat from a bag, as opposed to a fresh kill? I think not. Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first try to deceive.............. Yeah but Walmart has a 100% money back guarantee on their meat. If a Bigfoot isn't fully satisfied then you could always take it back for a refund.
Guest Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 You'll soon find out this BF went for the ribs nailed to the tree. Why is this so IMPOSSIBLE? This particular BF was habituated to some extent. All this chatter and snide comments about *walmart* are meant to bash and deride.
Cisco Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 Where did you guys read or hear the ribs were cooked? I had always assumed the ribs were raw because the were nailed to a tree. You could not nail cooked ribs to a tree as they would fall apart. Anyhow, I have been out of the loop on recent developments so I assume Dyer said the ribs were cooked? It makes more sense to me that they were raw.
WRabbit Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 I assume Dyer said the ribs were cooked? Several accounts I've read state this to be the case. Lloyds are sold are Walmart and are tough enough to be nailed to a tree. They're pre-cooked.....
Recommended Posts