Guest Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Bigfoot is still real so taxes and one mans work have no bearing on its existence nor does any of our thoughts for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 You are correct, in that just because one of the greats of bigfootery commited fraud for monetary gain doesnt mean bigfoot doesnt exit. But it does paint a picture of the type of individual who floats to the top of pond in this phenomina. Peter Bryne was one of the Four Horsemen of bigfoot research remember? Right there with Rene Dahinden, John Green, and Grover Krantz. Might want to start watching the guys your are following before they lead you over a cliff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Not following, they came and went before I was in the pond. I know your point but it shure doesn't look like anything but a misunderstanding to me. Just my own experiences is too much for me to deny their existence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Actually, Peter appears to have hoaxed when it comes to the Sasquatch. I know of three times he has claimed track finds and in each instance he used the same photo, but reversed and again flipped it over while claiming different sized measurements for the foot print in each case. Here is a paper that I found in John Green's collection of archived material that may be of interest to others. Peter and the Rabbit (to be continued) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Peter and the Rabbit (continued) (to be continued) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Peter and the rabbit (continued) (to be continued) Peter and the rabbit (continued) The end! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Bigfoot is still real so taxes and one mans work have no bearing on its existence nor does any of our thoughts for that matter. Disagree. Bigfoot is not, and never has been proven to be real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 To whom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIB Posted February 8, 2014 Moderator Share Posted February 8, 2014 Disagree. Bigfoot is not, and never has been proven to be real. Untrue. Not to YOUR satisfaction perhaps. They have proven themselves plenty real to me. A sighting will do that. Finding yourself within a foot of one that apparently doesn't want to leave has about the same effect. Be careful what you search for, it just might find you. MIB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 I do tend to chuckle at people who think stuff has to be proven to be real. Oh. OK. Might want to check with the universe about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 (edited) Disagree. Bigfoot is not, and never has been proven to be real. It's been proven real to those who have seen it. I do tend to chuckle at people who think stuff has to be proven to be real. Oh. OK. Might want to check with the universe about that. Yes .... probably the same people who believe there are black holes in outer space. Edited February 9, 2014 by Bigfoothunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 I am not sure when I have ever been of the state of mind that I could positively assert something not to have happened that someone there said happened. There must be a name for that in the literature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 I am not sure when I have ever been of the state of mind that I could positively assert something not to have happened that someone there said happened. There must be a name for that in the literature. There are several, but finding one that would not be insulting may be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 Hello Bigfoothunter, A really nice job posting those affidavits. I've never seen them and I'm sure I'm not the only one. John Green's last missive was especially good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 (edited) ^^ Your welcome, hiflier. I think these next three pages, which consist of two letters, are worth everyone seeing because they appear to show that Krantz believed that Byrne had set him up by using the same photo in a deceptive way in an effort to mislead him so to solicite a response that Byrne was seeking from someone with Grover's accreditation. It obviously caused Grover to terminate his association with Byrne. Edited February 9, 2014 by Bigfoothunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts