Guest Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Yeah T make sure you dont break any rules wouldnt want to get in trouble now do we All Scott Carpenter's photos. Ive seen faces in very little of his photos or vids.but i admit i agree on a few. Most of it i am wondering how he even saw that in the first place because i see nothing..
Old Dog Posted February 8, 2015 Posted February 8, 2015 ItsAsquatch, sometimes people see what they WANT to see.
1980squatch Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 His sighting, the account makes plain, messed him up. Apparently more than a wee. A somewhat straightforward sighting, nothing in the story raising red flags, very believable. Fast forward to now, I don't know if he is actively hoaxing or is just nuts.
Guest DWA Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Lots of what sound like straightforward sightings to me mess people up who had the experience. It's seeing something you know isn't real...and now know different.
Guest Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 A dead bigfoot in the freezer: Dyer-Whitton 2008 picture at the bigfootencounters website.
Guest Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Hmmm that quote interestingly phrased in above.. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Reserve spokesman Tom Mackenzie, however, said officers also are not taking the claim seriously and will not investigate Bigfoot because it not a federal priority."It's not on endangered species on any list that we've got," Mackenzie said
Guest Posted February 10, 2015 Posted February 10, 2015 Hmmm that quote interestingly phrased in above.. Good point, I read that too! Speaking of which, a Monarch butterfly is receiving endangered species status and earmarked for $3.2 million in set aside federal lands for habitat, while we wonder why the same attention is ignored on this topic.
Guest Posted February 10, 2015 Posted February 10, 2015 no wondering needed no BF body = no attention
Doc Holliday Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 man, I cant believe you fellas knocking a pro researcher like butchykid "holy ______ its a BIGFOOT!! back on track..... anything Biscardi , the unnamed one that rhymes with Fryer , Standings muppet squatch..... hate to say it but I think thermalman's estimate was fairly accurate, at least for what has been shared publicly. The guy that was holding a "bigfoot print cast" next to his bare foot... and the cast was, it could not have been more obvious, of his foot. yes, I remember that one . the maroon was bold enough to pose with his own bare foot held up beside the cast...... identical.
Rockape Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 The worst evidence I have ever seen? 99% of what is presented.
Guest Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 All of those examples of fraud and hoaxes only serve to embolden skeptics …. FWIW
Guest DWA Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 ^^^But they shouldn't. Those of us who know what the live, unaddressed evidence looks like know that that, and this, are apples and Ganymede. It does no good to point to how many fakes there are. To discredit the live evidence based on the fakes is insupportable. It is the exact logical equivalent to saying that two people in a horse costume casts serious doubt upon the authenticity of horses.
Guest Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 ^^^But they shouldn't. Those of us who know what the live, unaddressed evidence looks like know that that, and this, are apples and Ganymede. It does no good to point to how many fakes there are. To discredit the live evidence based on the fakes is insupportable. It is the exact logical equivalent to saying that two people in a horse costume casts serious doubt upon the authenticity of horses. I am in agreement with you on that ... But as you probably already know some are predisposed to accept hoaxes as facts as though they themselves are guided by emotion rather than common sense.
Guest DWA Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 Accepting a hoax as a fact is one thing, if the hoax *is* a fact. To go from this fact to a blanket condemnation with no supporting evidence is a flight of fancy...which I find amusing from anyone who demands proof from me. You first.
Guest Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 (edited) DWA - My was not intended to you heck, I would never guessed you were a skeptic. After the laughter came the realization that you're right. I think we've just resolved the endless Bigfoot-No Bigfoot debate once and for all. If I look under the bed, I will determine with certainty that dust either exists or doesn't exist. Therefore, it's best I don't look there. - Your Move. Edited February 11, 2015 by Gumshoeye
Recommended Posts