Guest Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 That is like saying "sure, a dentist can fill a tooth, but can she fill THAT tooth"
Incorrigible1 Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Not yet. Not prone to conclusion jumping, either........
Guest HucksterFoot Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 (edited) Of course they can, and some do. I know at least one, very prominent, that does. My point was just that at this stage, we need to get the genetics straight, and that doesn´t nescesarily take an anthropologist to do so, as implied in the post I was answering. I see, it was that big "nope" that threw me. Now, it's a "not necessarily". Edited March 1, 2012 by grayjay 1B Forum Rules
southernyahoo Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Well have you read the paper? Not all of it, like most papers, you have to subscribe somewhere to read the whole paper, or get to the PDF file.
Guest Bipedal Ape Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Not yet. Not prone to conclusion jumping, either........ That's why I said no one knows if she's had success with bigfooting yet... because... well noone knows
Guest HucksterFoot Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Not all of it, like most papers, you have to subscribe somewhere to read the whole paper, or get to the PDF file. I'm old fashioned; I like the kind of papers you read, then throw in the fireplace. :] Not implying that I don't read reputable papers or that up and coming ones might make good tinder. :]
Guest Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Here are a couple of links to abstracts from publications that had Ketchum listed as an author . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15834735 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19646946
Guest spurfoot Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Truth only reveals itself when one gives up all preconceived ideas. ~Shoseki
Guest Transformer Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 ^I see your one and raise you one Science is facts; just as houses are made of stone, so is science made of facts; but a pile of stones is not a house, and a collection of facts is not necessarily science. Jules Henri Poincaré (1854-1912) French mathematician. Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition. Adam Smith (1723-90) Scottish economist. The Wealth of Nations, 1776.
Wheellug Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Just to ask... what website are we all to view the update on? I saw one once but have lost the linky to it. With 103 pages here, it would be easier to ask than to go through them all... oh.. please and thanks!
Guest Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 MSNBC http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1330612861175&sqi=2&ved=0CDgQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F3033055%2Fns%2Ftechnology_and_science-science%2F&ei=b4pPT46WJsLY0QHx86z3DQ&usg=AFQjCNHXmu0ZkJvxV4HxOJQYEEYmF7gskw&sig2=LEpXCOpOnfekFNnIxuuVXg
Guest Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 Only a few hours to go Only a few hours to go for what? The link above goes to an article about an ancient fly.
Recommended Posts