Cotter Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Sleuth, I've often thought that as well, I think Parn is right on with his explanation of an embargo, but we're also dealing with NDA's and even perhaps add'l requirements, perhaps not established or required by the journal, but rather the parties involved. So, I think both DMK, SR, and Parn are most likely accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronD Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 I'm probably the most notinformed person here, so what are NDA's? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BFSleuth Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 NDA = NonDisclosure Agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Another Thursday goes by... There's always next week.... I will hold out for the next three Thursdays but optimism is dwindling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 "I do want to thank all of you from the bottom of my heart for you kindness and support. I have become acquainted with some of the most wonderful and caring people in this that I could ever want to meet. They are what make this thing worth doing." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 (edited) Anyone whos tierd of this whole Ketchum nonsence will love this. Sums ups my views perfectly Enjoy! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cv1a6UCdg0&list=UUbT-dVD8X9m5QMtWLwtiZdQ&index=4&feature=plcp Edited April 27, 2012 by danmyers22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Tick tock lol Personally i'm looking forward to what the paper will lead to, not so much what the paper will suggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest slimwitless Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Someone asked if the manuscript is legit. Answer: It is legitimate science involving several disciplines. I wouldn't have double digit co-authors many with PhDs and some University Heads of Departments if this was nothing more than a hoax. We are ALL putting it on the line. Like one head of department said, this is so interesting, why wouldn't we want to be a part of this? Most of the authors have been in on this project for a long time. As we did more science, we added a couple more with a certain expertise. Our bases are well covered. Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigantor Posted April 27, 2012 Admin Share Posted April 27, 2012 Cervelo, is that you on the video? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 DanMeyers.....Thank you! Great video, and spot on, IMO! This whole debacle is becoming laughable. Being an athlete my whole life, the 'put up, or shut up' mantra has always been my stance on everything. Talk is cheap. I still can't wrap my brain around why you would need to address naysayers relentlessly if your end result will shut them up anyways? Why, rpt, why do people who claim to have extensive sightings and experiences always fall back on the 'I don't want to violate their trust by capturing their soul with a photograph, or video?' So she's more than happy to take OTHER people's evidence, and examine it, yet refuses to get anything on her own? Hmmm. Maybe we can get Sally to take the pics for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I will watch for news of the KR (Ketchum Report) here but also keep checking her FB site, as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nalajr Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 My prediction is that if there is a paper that is ever released it will not be in a scientific journal, but on a website that each and every person that wants to see the paper, pics and vidoes, will have to pay for. Why else would you hold back on photos or videos that she has? Those wouldn't have a thing to do with her paper being approved. We'll see one day I suppose. Nalajr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 quick update from the fb page "Someone asked if the manuscript is legit. Answer: It is legitimate science involving several disciplines. I wouldn't have double digit co-authors many with PhDs and some University Heads of Departments if this was nothing more than a hoax. We are ALL putting it on the line. Like one head of department said, this is so interesting, why wouldn't we want to be a part of this? Most of the authors have been in on this project for a long time. As we did more science, we added a couple more with a certain expertise. Our bases are well covered." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronD Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 A little off topic perhaps, but what if the DNA results reveal that the DNA is human, or hybrid human.....would the hunter (Justin) face any criminal charges? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yowiie Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 A little off topic perhaps, but what if the DNA results reveal that the DNA is human, or hybrid human.....would the hunter (Justin) face any criminal charges? Haven't you been following the thread, no body, no crime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts