Guest Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BFSleuth Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Let's all hope that the weight of your posts will reach the ears of Dr. Ketchum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) After the Bigfoot world has waited for hundreds of years for a scientific study on the existence of Bigfoot...... Or just a Scientific study of the evidence.." I can wait. Because now,a private sector scientist has started a meaningful study that no " Ivory Tower Tenured" member of the scientific community would do. (exceptions being Sykes and Meldrum, hats off to them.). BTW, SS, you don't speak for me, I can wait in silence until the release. As far as I am concerned, you talk only for yourself. No one is perfect, nor will they ever be in the eyes of the Bigfoot world Dr. Ketchum is the only one with the expertise and "Gumption to tackle a. Study of this type... Besides, after the release, your previous posts will be entertaining reading.. ........ About what not to say, and say, and say,and say.... BTW, Any one ever consider that Nat Geo may be making a special edition about "Findiing Sasquatch".. LOL!!! Edited September 5, 2012 by MikeG .........to bring into complaince with rule 3E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) And if its not published or does get published but doesn't prove the existence of bigfoot, this whole thread will be entertaining to read. And getting published in a non peer-reviewed journal doesn't count. Let's all hope that the weight of your posts will reach the ears of Dr. Ketchum. Yes. We can always hope she will hear our cries of anguish.lol Edited September 5, 2012 by MikeG .......please do not quote the preceding post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Suesquach Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Maybe one of the reasons this study seems to be taking too long is that Dr. Ketchum is working on proving the existence of what is currently thought of as a Cryptid! How often, if ever, has that happened? Sure, we all want answers and IMO they will be forthcoming. I wish her and her team the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 What's this business about a Sierra Kills discrepancy? Can someone provide post numbers, or at least a page number? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunflower Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Squating, Why do you insist on spreading misinformation? Please explain "the three years" remark? You need to read the entire thread and then read it again, I think you missed something. Also, I don't know how long you been waiting nor do I care but please try to be constructive not destructive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Sunflower wrote: "You need to read the entire thread and then read it again" Jeez Sunflower - I know he's been baiting us a little but that's one harsh punishment! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunflower Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Ya think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) Squating, Why do you insist on spreading misinformation? Please explain "the three years" remark? You need to read the entire thread and then read it again, I think you missed something. Also, I don't know how long you been waiting nor do I care but please try to be constructive not destructive. The start of all this was back in 2009 with destination truth. 3 years. here's a link http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/blog/bigfoot/melba-ketchum-2011-bigfoot-dna-study/ And I am being constructive. I'm just trying to get the forum members to enlighten me on the evidence that Ketchum has confirmed a paper has been submitted to a journal and that its in peer-review without resorting to hearsay. What's this business about a Sierra Kills discrepancy? Can someone provide post numbers, or at least a page number? look at post 7595 Edited September 5, 2012 by squating squatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 I don't know when the paper was submitted, but I do know Dr. Ketchum has been into analysing purported Bigfoot DNA since 2007. Possibly longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 (edited) Ketchum has definitely been vague and ambiguous about whether the paper is still in peer review or has already passed it, but what she did claim was that it's going to be published sometime in 2012: https://www.facebook...tal_comments=24 Edited September 6, 2012 by gershake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 ^^^^It won't let me look at that facebook page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 I don't blame them for not friending you, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BFSleuth Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Yes, you do need to be friended in order to view the page. Turn on the charm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts