Guest icicle Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 (edited) ^^Slimwitless...good point. The paper might have run into trouble due to too much lip liner. Can we get OFF the subject of how she looked?? Really. Icicle, not to be harsh but go hang out on a modeling forum and talk about her choice of make-up there. Some data is forbidden, is it? Had much success hunting cryptids? Edited November 29, 2012 by icicle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 (edited) Icicle, See post #9989. The report button is available for a reason. Edited November 29, 2012 by bananasquatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icicle Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Icicle, See post #9989. The report button is available for a reason. That's OK. I'll only make one more post after this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Dr. Ketchum is beautiful, at least to this beholder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 I also think Dr. Ketchum looks decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Some data is forbidden, is it? Had much success hunting cryptids? It is still attack the person (for several pages ) not the science ..... Geesh guys, is that not a forum rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Perhaps we should wait and see if I'm wrong first. There is something about all these people who want to wait for the evidence to come in and then, well, can't. (I'm still not over Disotell. I mean you nailed Disotell, I gotta tell you.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 I wonder if the peer reviewers have taken all this into consideration. If they have they're not doing their jobs right. The paper is the ONLY thing they are supposed to be considering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kampz Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 (edited) I also think Dr. Ketchum looks decent. pics I looked. ... Edited November 29, 2012 by kampz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 The last 3 pages have been like a Mind Eraser, now I will have to ask all the same questions all over again just to get my head straight. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 What a lucky lady getting all of these bigfoot DNA samples all over the United States. What's the difference between me and her or her and you? Even luckier then Patterson IMO. I'm not saying she's a liar but, this girl can go anywhere and leave a "nutbar" out and bigfoot will eat it. Are you saying she went out an obtained the samples herself ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest slimwitless Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 (edited) The snowball is still at the top of the mountain but ABC News has a write-up here. It says Ketchum didn't "immediately" respond to a request for comment. Edited November 29, 2012 by slimwitless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tontar Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 And I thought skeptics were supposed to be the enemy. I've been reading up on everything I can possibly get my hands on as far as first and maybe second person reports, and still waiting to see what happens. I frankly couldn't care less what Dr. Ketchum looks like in some Skyped video interview. Sure, it was not the most glamorous shot, but I could really care less. I'm sure that Skype is not particularly generous to any of us! I want to see the report, and the subsequent analysis once it hits the street. Now about that DNA study. Here's another interesting article about mixed, non-homogeneous DNA within our own species, and how that varying percentage might relate to sasquatches. http://prehistoricfantasy.blogspot.com/2012/05/iwo-eleru-is-not-2-archaic-content-in.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 ^^^^ this is the only comment I will make about this because it's off topic. Patterson got lucky because Patty let them see her because she had a young one near by and she led the group away from her child purposefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 ::Tontar frantically studying any info on hybrid species trackways:: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts