Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 (edited) On 12/2/2012 at 9:36 PM, slimwitless said: Pretty decent piece here including a phone interview with MK and a discussion with some level-headed skeptics. Ketchum claims to have hi-def video. LINK He said all the while that she as over killed the data so there would be no denying it On 12/2/2012 at 9:56 PM, Cervelo said: SY, So your gonna roll with this... That two species one completely unknown, breed with a well established tool maker and user of fire.... Their offspring was a completely new species of monster moron that somehow developed extrordinary skills like, night vision, infrasound, mind reading, blah blah over the last 15,000 years, left no fossil record and yet walks amongst as we speak? Stating something that MK never even mentioned, and then your hammering it home like it is the core of the study. When the study is released, and these skills are part of the study, Then you can ride that monster moron like a beautiful stallion into the sunset, But until then, why don't you just keep it in the barn Southern yahoo Quote Straw man argument. I told you before to focus on the bilogical, tangible evidence. There is no evidence they aren't in the fossil record. All you know is that none are named bigfoot. Denisovan bones just discovered 4 years ago weren't in the fossil record either. Science is constantly changing their understanding of the past as new evidence is unearthed, so there is no set truth in it. Roger that yahoo Edited December 2, 2012 by zigoapex
Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 On 12/2/2012 at 10:17 PM, Cervelo said: Got any reports from 15,000 years ago? We have N American accounts going back untold 1000s of years.
Guest Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 (edited) del Edited December 2, 2012 by zigoapex
Guest Cervelo Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 On 12/2/2012 at 10:29 PM, Mulder said: We have N American accounts going back untold 1000s of years. Yep that will close the deal for sure!
Guest gershake Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 "To all submitters: I formally cut ties with Sally Ramey several months ago. Contact Robin Lynne Forestpeople for information on press releases and other questions." https://www.facebook.com/melba.ketchum/posts/529359940409460 "Or of course you can contact me for updates." https://www.facebook.com/melba.ketchum/posts/529360130409441
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) On 12/2/2012 at 10:45 PM, Cervelo said: Yep that will close the deal for sure! You asked if there were reports. There are. Edited December 3, 2012 by See-Te-Cah NC To remove unapproved content
Guest DWA Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 On 12/2/2012 at 10:28 PM, Mulder said: You do realize that night vision, infrasound, etc would be inherited attributes, not "developed skills", don't you? And could easily come from Primate/Hominid X. Oh, and it isn't established that we don't have such fossils, sitting uncatalogued or mis-catalogued in some university or museum collection. Right. The most fundamental logic fail among the 'skeptics' - whose 'arguments' aren't arguments, so this isn't surprising - is the 'no one has ever' 'arguments'. The Minaret Skull is only one example of evidence submitted for analysis that "got disappeared." http://karlshuker.blogspot.com/2012/08/mystery-of-minaret-skull-mislaid.html Some others just may not have been properly catalogued, or were stored without any attempt being made. Museums will be going through their collections after confirmation. That's one thing one can count on.
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) On 12/2/2012 at 6:50 PM, thermalman said: And what has Matt got in 20 years? Just asking? A really good data base, a good organization dedicated to research, and public support of his TV show according to ratings. Edited December 3, 2012 by Tim Kota
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 On 12/2/2012 at 10:29 PM, Mulder said: We have N American accounts going back untold 1000s of years. Correct, and most were refuted by the lame stream Academic Types... Seems like now, they might be listening, and reading and looking for (instead of talking point arguments) facts like should have happened, over the last couple of centuries. In some ways it is so sad when the Talking Points of many, lead the way over facts, for so long, and so many folks that had encounters, were basically hammered into summision and/or called liars......
Guest thermalman Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) On 12/3/2012 at 12:52 AM, Tim Kota said: A really good data base, a good organization dedicated to research, and public support of his TV show according to ratings. Which proves what? Melba seems to have found more in less time. And she did it without all the accolades that you've attributed to MM. Most times it's better to keep quiet. Edited December 3, 2012 by thermalman to remove a flaming comment
bipedalist Posted December 3, 2012 BFF Patron Posted December 3, 2012 On 12/2/2012 at 3:45 PM, See-Te-Cah NC said: Moderator Statement: This thread is about the Ketchum Report, not Matt Moneymaker. Your reports of his tweets and his opinion have been stated, now let's move back on-topic. There is no need to keep on about this subject. Any further off-topic discussion will be removed and penalties will possibly be assessed. Thank you, See Yah, I thought I remembered why the thread just got closed and reopened.
See-Te-Cah NC Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 This Is The Absolute Last Statement I Am Going To Make: Matt Moneymaker has Nothing to do with this topic. I've already issued Mod Statements here, so punitive measures are forthcoming. Those that chose to disregard have no excuse, nor will those that continue to disregard the staff. Do Not Bring Matt Moneymaker Back Into This Topic. You will not like it if you do. I hope this is clear to all. See
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) On 12/3/2012 at 2:10 AM, thermalman said: Melba seems to have found Nothing has been found until it materializes, it's all just talk for now. I hope she did find something but it's not looking good for her. Edit to remove double post. Edited December 3, 2012 by Tim Kota
Guest Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 On 12/3/2012 at 2:49 AM, Tim Kota said: . . . . it's not looking good for her. A statement you have no basis for.
Guest thermalman Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) On 12/3/2012 at 2:49 AM, Tim Kota said: Nothing has been found until it materializes, it's all just talk for now. I hope she did find something but it's not looking good for her. Edit to remove double post. Why would she announce something she doesn't have? There is no logical process for her to do that. Do you have proof to that affect? I'd be willing to hear what you have to say? Edited December 3, 2012 by thermalman
Recommended Posts