Guest Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 I cannot come up with a reason as to why general is still posting on here, he apparentley knows the results but refuses to elaborate, if there are NDA's should he not be saying anything. I feel its just adding fuel to a fire thats going to die, quickly. It's possible he's made a few friends on the forum, and he just enjoys the interaction.
Guest maximusnow Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 General, I have not a clue as to what is fact or faked. With all due respect, can you or any one involved, please tell me ...... 1) Have you ever look at any footage and say , Wow! that is a real Bigfoot. Thats is what I saw that day. if so what footage? There are so many drawings, photos and videos that show suspected Squatches. In your own evaluation, comming from someone who has seen several up close, can you tell the rest of us, what one really looks like? What footage can we look at and say, That is what it really looks like! Adrian Erickson footage shows two differant looking creatures...what does it look like for real? Thanks for your help in advance Regards, Maximus can you pick one of these that look close to what you saw, in the photo provided...or at least give your own drawing of the adult and child .... Thanks, Maximus
Guest Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 Maximus, I think General opened up about page 16 or so in this topic. Description and pictures and such. I would look for you, but I don't have the 18 hours or so it would take to find it. I still want to know where "thedriver" went. Maybe he or General could take a picture of the chunk o' squatch and post it here. See this coyote for ourselves.
Guest Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 This was posted on bf evidence Was Justin Smeja's Bigfoot steak really from a Bigfoot? Or was it from a coyotelike Matt Moneymaker suggested? Sources have informed me of the following: The steak was sent out to ~8 different labs to be tested on a blind basis. Nuclear DNA testing was part of the process. The labs were not told what they were getting and they had no idea what they were testing. Two of the labs were said to have “figured out what it was,†whatever that means, and honestly it doesn’t make sense in the context. The cost was $~11,000 per result, so ~$90,000 was spent on DNA sequencing of the steak. This cost was apparently footed by Wally Hersom. From all eight labs, the results came back: 1. Not human. 2. Not any known animal. 3. “Unknown primate.†A lot of the labs made communications to Ketchum along the lines of “What in the Hell is this we are testing anyway?†“WFT?†“WTH?†“Huh?†The labs were essentially dumbfounded and befuddled by the specimen, but they reported the results in official reports as they were paid to do. #3. is important, because although the DNA matched no known living creature, it is primate DNA. I would go further and suggest that it is hominid DNA. #1 is extremely important and cannot be emphasized enough. This is because the skeptic blogs keep repeating over and over that Ketchum’s results are “human DNA.†I can emphatically confirm that the results for at least the Bigfoot steak from the Sierra Kills were definitely “100% non human.†The reason we know it is not human is because the genes are too far apart from human genes. Say we look at 30,000 nuclear DNA genes. The results will be something like this: Human Bigfoot ChimpanzeeHuman 0? 600 1,800 Out of 30,000 nuclear DNA genes, the chimpanzee will differ from the human on ~1,800 genes. The Bigfoot will possibly differ from the human by ~600 genes. It is this distance in genes, and nothing else, that is apparently leading Ketchum to say that Bigfoots exist as a biological entity. If you have a sample of 30,000 genes in which 600 of them differ from Homo sapiens, there is no way on Earth that we are dealing with “human DNA,†as the skeptics repeat in a near autistic, Tourette’s like fashion. I really wish we could put this to rest, but the skeptics keep banging their heads against this wall, so we have to keep answering it as redundantly as they ask it. This post is a thinker for me. I tried to think of an intelligent answer but I guess the truth is more practical.. if its late at night I've likely been drinking beer........ That's gotta affect something... I will bring home road kill for dinner on occasion. my only shoes are cowboy boots. I got a pair of wedding jeans (wranglers that are still so blue their pretty much just used for very dressy occasions like weddings and funerals.) I drive a 99 f150 with 4 second hand tires. There's always spitters flying out the back. I can butchor a deer way under an hour start to finish. As far as why I'm not a hick?? Oh I uhm. Oh I like that sushi stuff i hate horses (they are death traps) and when I was a teenager I died my hair red and listened to rock music. Anyways who cares. I'm sure we are all over hearing about me. Im sure we all skimmed through that paragraph. Police/dfg/forestry department have all been called prob close to 6 times by now by several people. No report was taken. I even posted the local le number and told posters here to call away. You won't be taken seriously. Atleast I wasn't. LOL ! were alike except my dress jeans are black jeans and i'm not a ford guy, but the deer,beer,music,etc... same boat !
Guest Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 I'm fairly certain that Dr. Ketchum remarked in her video presentation at Honobia that samples sent to outside labs were labeled human DNA. Of course, maybe an exception was made with the Sierra sample. General, Thanks for your reply. I was thinking you might be employing a barely literate persona and sometimes forgot to stay in character. You attribute your uneven posts to late night beer consumption. Does this mean that most of your posts here were done under the influence? May I ask if this is normal behavior for you, or are you feeling the effects of all the excitement of the last year and bending an elbow more often as a result? I've been known to take a sip or two or three of Jim Beam near bed time. I refrain from posting while I'm sipping.....just to make sure my posts are as lucid as I can make them (even though some might think the Beam may in fact explain some of my posts!) Anyone have any ideas why the mainstream media has not picked up this story?
Guest slimwitless Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Anyone have any ideas why the mainstream media has not picked up this story? Probably because no one has issued a press release.
Guest RedRatSnake Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Cause outside of us BF enthusiasts no one gives a crap. Tim ~
Guest slimwitless Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Not true. Every few months a Bigfoot story makes the media. The ridiculously fuzzy "Knobby" video and the BF "face imprint" both made news in the not so distant past. Bigfoot is more popular than ever. I think it's curious this hasn't been covered at all though. Edited December 9, 2011 by slimwitless
Guest Jodie Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Down right strange, if you ask me. You would think even the tabloids would spin it into a Frankenstein type story, but not one word.
Guest Thepattywagon Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 If the blood that got on General's clothes tests out to be 'unknown primate' but yet different than the 'steak'results, I would think that would give credibility to his story.
Guest Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 I don't know about handles..seems anyone can use any pen-name unlinked..and such a comment yesterday in this same bigfootevidence.blogspot comment section: J Bindernagle said... Many of us have waited a very long time for this and knew the day would come. if true comment, then I am pretty sure he knows.. . hoping the site guy can sort it out. I do know most Journals require at least a week "press moratorium" to give those outlets time to review story and interview, etc.... it has been broken before by some outlets..it is voluntary I beleive..but to their advantage... so why still "leaks?" you got me..the secrets and weird dealings and non-statements defy my paltry logic!
bipedalist Posted December 9, 2011 BFF Patron Posted December 9, 2011 Only thing is, unless that is a typo. in the post above, Bindernagel doesn't spell his name as you do.
Guest Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Only thing is, unless that is a typo. in the post above, Bindernagel doesn't spell his name as you do. W/o an assistant, glasses, or serious self edit..my spelling errors and typos are high frequency...but I think the intro to the comment was a cut and paste..and why I came here.. He doesn't strike me as the kind who would post in advance like that, do you think he would? I don't think the site guy can actually look up a name or give out.. I hope not anyway! LOL we all should hope for that.... so thanks and I'll leave it to you guys to sort out! but is why I posted.. Edited December 9, 2011 by apehuman
Guest slimwitless Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Look here: http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/12/most-powerful-quote-of-day-dr-john.html#moretop Includes a fresh quote from someone that can spell Bindernagel.
Recommended Posts