Leaderboard

That guy is everywhere!😶‍🌫️

It was Bob Heironimus.

I think this is the report of which you remembered: https://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=50124

Hope everyone is doing well and having a great summer! I have a bunch of pics that I need to catch up with.....here are 3 interesting prints, one guy moving through the creek and his cousin a few million years ago.

It’s a trail camera. There are multiple photos of the bait site. The Bushnell time stamp is clearly visible on the photo. I think pararational.com needs to do its homework.

There are a LOT of repeating themes in the report data, factors common to a goodly number of reports. It could easily be a different report with shared characteristics. It's that very "I think there's an echo in here" aspect which leads many bigfooters to believe they exist even without personal experience of any sort.

The Philadelphia (PA) Inquirer updates readers with two reports concerning the "Darby Gorilla" published on November 28, 1906.

Hello all! I am from the UK and have had an interest in Bigfoot for many years. I wish to further the research into this via this website and hopefully gain more insights and see some interesting evidence. 😊

Just look at our closest extinct cousin. Shorter. Way more robust. Now imagine something still bipedal but even larger and more robust. Would love to know more about Denisovans. They are truly a species that is in the right place at the right time to cross the land bridge before Homo Sapiens. Or it’s not closely related to us at all. It’s coming out of left field. Anyhow I thought Darden could put some perspective into supposed Sasquatch strength.

Hi everyone, I’m from the UK and have been interested in Sasquatch and Bigfoot for many years. Although I haven’t had a personal encounter myself, I’ve spent a lot of time researching the subject and watching countless videos, documentaries, witness interviews, and audio recordings. The amount of footage and sound evidence I’ve come across over the years has led me to genuinely believe there’s something real behind the Sasquatch phenomenon. Whether it’s visual evidence, vocalizations, or eyewitness accounts, I find the topic fascinating and enjoy keeping up with new discoveries and discussions.

We'll never know the truth unless a Mothershop lands on the whitehouse lawn and an alien steps out wanting to talk to the President. UFOs are used as cover for black projects, doesn't mean all UFO cases are fabricated by the government, but a lot are.

The threats against whistleblowers and even the outbreak of missing and assumed deceased scientists is grist for the mill about how national security will continue to be used to cover up black box programs and funds, we can only hope the gold bars at Ft Knox haven't flown the coop already. Family of potential whistle blowers are now threatened and false charges used to wreck careers so the stories about BF researchers having home invasions and computers snatched in the past is totally believable. Mr. Gold's comments on the paranormal are as normal as remote viewing now.

I have not seen this film, and will not, but I will speculate about it within the overall history of sasquatchery since 1955 (the Jerry Crew event). Firstly, it is most similar to the Greg Long book thus far. Long's book was an immediate hit with the skeptic community, and it became their bible. Since its publication, it rose quickly in prominence, but since has been roundly considered a hoax in and of itself among all who give it any measure of honest consideration. The skeptic community still tries to defend it amongst themselves, but appear to be True Believers by many, and the scientific community pretty much ignores them. Indeed, there is increasing interest in the phenomenon by the scientific community, especially the DNA field, and this probably frightens the skeptic community. Secondly, the commercial side of sasquatchery is exploding. Cartoonish and AI sasquatches are all over YouTube and commercial products. My grandson bought me Bigfoot shampoo and hair conditioner for my birthday last fall. It's nuts. My family buys me Bigfoot T-shirts all the time. If sasquatches exist or not in biology, they clearly exist in fantasy and imaginations BIG TIME, and it's growing. This alone is crushing the skeptic religion. They're done in the short term regardless of "discovery". That's the primary reason why I speculate that this film is desperation, and may even be the reason why they produced it. They know they're on the ropes.

Published in what was at the time, the Humboldt Standard of Eureka (CA) on October 13, 1958. If Truth or Consequences aired an episode about the Crew track find, it may have suggested to Roger Patterson and others that there was money to be made in finding Bigfoot.

Here's the complete December 1959 True Magazine article:

Such surely brings into question any conclusions our new member draws.

I am not killing the messenger. You were cherry picking some “gotcha moment” Rogan video short against Meldrum. Which is a crock. It doesn’t even remotely represent what Meldrum said in the full interview let alone years of conferences and his BOOK!? Really? Have you read it? So hence forth I will be scrutinizing you based on this slanderous event you perpetrated on this forum. Sorry.

Meldrum was just repeating Joe’s line where he explores what he thinks is a possibility. The only arguments presented here by skeptics are that people close to Patterson claim it’s a hoax. Meanwhile Patty herself has characteristics that aren’t repeatable with costumes.

No. We have no body. Therefore we cannot rule out option A. No film includes a body for science to poke. You’re taking Meldrum out of context there. It’s cheap. A three second gotcha doesn’t erase his years of research on the subject. Or Bill Munns for that matter….. This might work on Reddit or some Facebook page. But it won’t work here. 🙄

It’s the Philip Morris - Bob H. Recreation from 20 years ago. It’s an abomination. Again, it’s not that Roger was a con man. He was. It’s not that Bob G. gets dates wrong or facts wrong from 60 years ago. He does. The 800 lbs Gorilla in the room is Patty walking across that creek bed. Which 20 years ago they failed spectacularly to recreate.🤷‍♂️

I don't understand your concern about someone "gutting" the PGF. It stood the test of time here on BFF under an electron-microscope type analysis and it is entirely irrelevant who Patterson and Gimlin were personally. Go ahead and try to destroy their reputation. It doesn't change the fact that a video is out there every aspect of which has been analyzed here at BFF over the many years. In my opinion, anyone who wishes to claim the PGF was a hoax has to specifically disprove Gigantofootecus' ASH ratio calculations and Patty's forearm ratio. Not knowing those two issues intimately, much less at all, tells me everything I need to know about someone's ability to intelligently discuss the PGF. Moreover, have they read Bill's Munn's works, which, in my opinion, are a veritable treatise on the PGF, or even know who he is? There are many people who have opinions about a lot of things they possess little or no knowledge. Let them come here and debate both critical, and tangential, issues of the PGF itself.

Thanks for the info. I haven't delved into it, but I have one question, if anyone knows an answer: Is Kitikaze (old BFF skeptic) involved with the latest attempt to disprove PGF?

I would disagree because this is the left leg. Bear

Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found.

I’m not Bart but Rogan got him to admit the truth. Now a documentary proves it with confessions and pre planned test run.

Patterson confession on film.