Leaderboard

It was Bob Heironimus.

That guy is everywhere!😶‍🌫️

Since this also seems to be a current thread where the Morris suit is being discussed, I just put up two posts in the Patterson-Gimlin Film reference section. Basically, they go through Chapter 24 of Greg Long's book The Making of Bigfoot (so others don't have to suffer) and breaks out every specific item of information that Philip Morris stated about his suit. Some of those points don't necessarily shed any light on the issue when taken individually; others - to my mind - make it clear that Patty is not a person in a suit. No proponent of the PG film should jump to the conclusion that Philip Morris is lying. He could just be completely wrong. Interestingly, he could also be write on the details of Roger ordering a suit, but he could be wrong about when that happened. For example, if Roger and Al DeAtley were trying to recreate the P-G film for use in a future project, part of Mr. Morris's recollections could be correct.

Does he want it back? 🔥

They can't even get the state it was taken in correct. And oddly enough, they say that the JACOB'S photos were taken by someone by the name of Wilson. More internet slop.

Hope everyone is doing well and having a great summer! I have a bunch of pics that I need to catch up with.....here are 3 interesting prints, one guy moving through the creek and his cousin a few million years ago.

It’s a trail camera. There are multiple photos of the bait site. The Bushnell time stamp is clearly visible on the photo. I think pararational.com needs to do its homework.

There are a LOT of repeating themes in the report data, factors common to a goodly number of reports. It could easily be a different report with shared characteristics. It's that very "I think there's an echo in here" aspect which leads many bigfooters to believe they exist even without personal experience of any sort.

The Philadelphia (PA) Inquirer updates readers with two reports concerning the "Darby Gorilla" published on November 28, 1906.

Hello all! I am from the UK and have had an interest in Bigfoot for many years. I wish to further the research into this via this website and hopefully gain more insights and see some interesting evidence. 😊

Hi everyone, I’m from the UK and have been interested in Sasquatch and Bigfoot for many years. Although I haven’t had a personal encounter myself, I’ve spent a lot of time researching the subject and watching countless videos, documentaries, witness interviews, and audio recordings. The amount of footage and sound evidence I’ve come across over the years has led me to genuinely believe there’s something real behind the Sasquatch phenomenon. Whether it’s visual evidence, vocalizations, or eyewitness accounts, I find the topic fascinating and enjoy keeping up with new discoveries and discussions.

Published in what was at the time, the Humboldt Standard of Eureka (CA) on October 13, 1958. If Truth or Consequences aired an episode about the Crew track find, it may have suggested to Roger Patterson and others that there was money to be made in finding Bigfoot.

It's neither here nor there, but I'd like to again point out Heironomous claims he was to be paid $1000 for his supposed stroll in a bigfoot costume. That's a ridiculously high sum of money.

Is that not just after frame 352? That is the exact rock/stick formations from Bluff Creek, the 66 footage isn’t in Bluff Creek from what I’ve read. Just looks like a filter over the Patterson footage.

so is this supposed to be pro PGF or pro capturing sasquatch?

I would disagree because this is the left leg. Bear

Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found.