Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 06/19/2026 in Posts
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
It’s a trail camera. There are multiple photos of the bait site. The Bushnell time stamp is clearly visible on the photo. I think pararational.com needs to do its homework.1 point
-
There are a LOT of repeating themes in the report data, factors common to a goodly number of reports. It could easily be a different report with shared characteristics. It's that very "I think there's an echo in here" aspect which leads many bigfooters to believe they exist even without personal experience of any sort.1 point
-
1 point
-
I think this is the report of which you remembered: https://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=501241 point
-
Hello all! I am from the UK and have had an interest in Bigfoot for many years. I wish to further the research into this via this website and hopefully gain more insights and see some interesting evidence. 😊1 point
-
Hi everyone, I’m from the UK and have been interested in Sasquatch and Bigfoot for many years. Although I haven’t had a personal encounter myself, I’ve spent a lot of time researching the subject and watching countless videos, documentaries, witness interviews, and audio recordings. The amount of footage and sound evidence I’ve come across over the years has led me to genuinely believe there’s something real behind the Sasquatch phenomenon. Whether it’s visual evidence, vocalizations, or eyewitness accounts, I find the topic fascinating and enjoy keeping up with new discoveries and discussions.1 point
-
The threats against whistleblowers and even the outbreak of missing and assumed deceased scientists is grist for the mill about how national security will continue to be used to cover up black box programs and funds, we can only hope the gold bars at Ft Knox haven't flown the coop already. Family of potential whistle blowers are now threatened and false charges used to wreck careers so the stories about BF researchers having home invasions and computers snatched in the past is totally believable. Mr. Gold's comments on the paranormal are as normal as remote viewing now.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Is that not just after frame 352? That is the exact rock/stick formations from Bluff Creek, the 66 footage isn’t in Bluff Creek from what I’ve read. Just looks like a filter over the Patterson footage.1 point
-
so is this supposed to be pro PGF or pro capturing sasquatch?1 point
-
Such surely brings into question any conclusions our new member draws.1 point
-
I am not killing the messenger. You were cherry picking some “gotcha moment” Rogan video short against Meldrum. Which is a crock. It doesn’t even remotely represent what Meldrum said in the full interview let alone years of conferences and his BOOK!? Really? Have you read it? So hence forth I will be scrutinizing you based on this slanderous event you perpetrated on this forum. Sorry.1 point
-
Meldrum was just repeating Joe’s line where he explores what he thinks is a possibility. The only arguments presented here by skeptics are that people close to Patterson claim it’s a hoax. Meanwhile Patty herself has characteristics that aren’t repeatable with costumes.1 point
-
No. We have no body. Therefore we cannot rule out option A. No film includes a body for science to poke. You’re taking Meldrum out of context there. It’s cheap. A three second gotcha doesn’t erase his years of research on the subject. Or Bill Munns for that matter….. This might work on Reddit or some Facebook page. But it won’t work here. 🙄1 point
-
It’s the Philip Morris - Bob H. Recreation from 20 years ago. It’s an abomination. Again, it’s not that Roger was a con man. He was. It’s not that Bob G. gets dates wrong or facts wrong from 60 years ago. He does. The 800 lbs Gorilla in the room is Patty walking across that creek bed. Which 20 years ago they failed spectacularly to recreate.🤷♂️1 point
-
I don't understand your concern about someone "gutting" the PGF. It stood the test of time here on BFF under an electron-microscope type analysis and it is entirely irrelevant who Patterson and Gimlin were personally. Go ahead and try to destroy their reputation. It doesn't change the fact that a video is out there every aspect of which has been analyzed here at BFF over the many years. In my opinion, anyone who wishes to claim the PGF was a hoax has to specifically disprove Gigantofootecus' ASH ratio calculations and Patty's forearm ratio. Not knowing those two issues intimately, much less at all, tells me everything I need to know about someone's ability to intelligently discuss the PGF. Moreover, have they read Bill's Munn's works, which, in my opinion, are a veritable treatise on the PGF, or even know who he is? There are many people who have opinions about a lot of things they possess little or no knowledge. Let them come here and debate both critical, and tangential, issues of the PGF itself.1 point
-
Thanks for the info. I haven't delved into it, but I have one question, if anyone knows an answer: Is Kitikaze (old BFF skeptic) involved with the latest attempt to disprove PGF?1 point
-
1 point
-
Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found.1 point
-
I’m not Bart but Rogan got him to admit the truth. Now a documentary proves it with confessions and pre planned test run.-1 points
-
-1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
