Leaderboard

All we need to do is capture a bunch of mosquitos that have bitten bigfoot, extract the DNA from the blood they drew, then reverse engineer bigfoot by using DNA from some other species to fill in the blanks in the genome sequence, then grow a few and show them off in some sort of Bigfoot theme park!!! Genius!!

And one of the mid-era greats. It would be most interesting to have a few beers with the guy and see how he feels now.

Most agree 'science' wants a body. Like Rick Noll (thanks for the name) I have become more emotional on the bigfoot concept and all the ramifications of such a thing. I am looking at the shooting of Bigfoot by a hunter like I might my dog. I love my dog but at some point, is she was terminal she would have to be put down. There would be NOTHING about having to put her down I would want to happen. Yet, at some crossroads in life we have to do the hard thing. With Bigfoot, like it or not, a body will only satisfy science. I am thinking it might even be more merciful for Bigfoot to be killed than captured. The necessity of shooting one is not the same as the necessity of having to put down a pet dog. It is in the same set of emotions involved somewhat in both issues. If one has to be shot, it has to be shot. I doubt Bigfoot would take to life in a zoo any more than we might.

We have 8 pages of comments on this topic alone. We may not be what we once were but we are certainly far from being dead.

Dr. Squatch soap and deodorant are awesome! I think that the further the younger generation gets from their hunting roots and woodsmanship, the less they care about nature other than in a general, climate change way. The less one cares about nature, the less something like sasquatch comes up in their thoughts or cares. Because I am a hunter, have loads of woodsmanship, am very old and spend a lot of time in nature, sasquatches are important to me.