Guest Posted March 4, 2011 Posted March 4, 2011 Shake I think he his talking about Erickson's desription, Greg's description and the you tube desription as all being the same. The quote below if you read carefully shows that he isnt talking of seeing a Erickson video but rather the one Erickson is making an in its description on Erickson page its the same description as Greg, and the you tube video.....Now who's on second and who's on first lol! Donlon quote: I believe this is the video that Erickson is making reference to in his description. If it is, why has he misrepresented it as the product of a scientific effort? Because that video was produced by the original witnesses by themselves. If he is referring to video obtained later it is striking that it is described using terms almost exactly like those that Gregg used to describe it to me in 2005. This is how it is described in a recent YouTube video: A full facial close-up: ~ nose similar to ours (but w/ larger nostrils) ~ slightly chapped, rosy lips ~ pink mouth, blackish tongue ~ pointed teeth, like fangs ~ deep set eyes that dart around and don’t blink ~ her head is round, shaped more like ours than a gorilla’s, but her brow is much more prominent ~ she has lots of fine, flowing hair on her head (dark reddish brown) and soft short hair on her face ~ when she walks away, she moves just like the female in the Patterson Film That's essentially what Gregg told me in 2005 (though he did not mention chapped lips nor a gait like the Patterson film). He emphasized that there was an animality to the creature. It did not appear at all human like.
Guest Posted March 4, 2011 Posted March 4, 2011 According to Derek Randels on his Feb. 06, 2010 appearance on Bigfoot Busters Radio; He said he believes that the close up footage of the Sasquatch was filmed by "the gal" (Dr. Leila Hadj-Chikh)while wearing a Ghillie Suit. Derek does say that he hopes he is not misspeaking prior to the above paraphrasing. The brief mention happens around 1 hour and 21 seconds into the show when Derek is asked about if he ever thought about using a Ghillie Suit in his research.
BobbyO Posted March 4, 2011 SSR Team Posted March 4, 2011 According to Derek Randels on his Feb. 06, 2010 appearance on Bigfoot Busters Radio; He said he believes that the close up footage of the Sasquatch was filmed by "the gal" (Dr. Leila Hadj-Chikh)while wearing a Ghillie Suit. Derek does say that he hopes he is not misspeaking prior to the above paraphrasing. The brief mention happens around 1 hour and 21 seconds into the show when Derek is asked about if he ever thought about using a Ghillie Suit in his research. Which would then lead to them having got additional footage meaning the last 2 pages on this thread were nothing but nothing other than unsubstantiated speculation.. I do love the world of Bigfootery..
gigantor Posted March 5, 2011 Admin Posted March 5, 2011 Wow! you people just love to argue... it's pointless, just wait 'til they release what they have and then you'll know for sure. I guess speculating can be a pastime.
Guest Posted March 5, 2011 Posted March 5, 2011 Hey, let us have some fun. It has been long enough since the PGF.
gigantor Posted March 5, 2011 Admin Posted March 5, 2011 (edited) True. Please ignore my previous post. I hope I'm wrong and they have something that will generate some justified excitement around here, we need it. Edited March 5, 2011 by gigantor
Guest wudewasa Posted March 5, 2011 Posted March 5, 2011 Wow! you people just love to argue... it's pointless, just wait 'til they release what they have and then you'll know for sure. I guess speculating can be a pastime. Well, I liken this behavior to all the people lining up to see the Star Wars prequels and Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Seriously people, this is what you look like in the eyes of mainstream America:
Guest Fanofsquatch Posted March 5, 2011 Posted March 5, 2011 Every time I hear of something like this I start to get excited and feel like we are on the verge of actually seeing this thing. Then I remember that the last best footage was filmed in 1967! Thats right 1967! I really really really hope this is something good not great just good. I need something to keep me going. I just hope my wife will let me buy this overpriced DVD.
BobbyO Posted March 5, 2011 SSR Team Posted March 5, 2011 Every time I hear of something like this I start to get excited and feel like we are on the verge of actually seeing this thing. Then I remember that the last best footage was filmed in 1967! Thats right 1967! I really really really hope this is something good not great just good. I need something to keep me going. I just hope my wife will let me buy this overpriced DVD. How much does it cost ?
Guest Posted March 5, 2011 Posted March 5, 2011 It's a Girl they have footage of. & they've christened her " Matilda ".. Can she waltz??
BobbyO Posted March 5, 2011 SSR Team Posted March 5, 2011 Can she waltz?? If she can it would probably mean she stole the Pancakes too..
Guest wudewasa Posted March 5, 2011 Posted March 5, 2011 If she can it would probably mean she stole the Pancakes too.. PURE SPECULATION!!!!! Now you are accusing a sasquatch to be a thief! lol
bipedalist Posted March 5, 2011 BFF Patron Posted March 5, 2011 Can she waltz?? You haven't heard?, Matilda's great coming out is scheduled for a Dancing with the Stars mega-event in conjunction with double helix documentation, etc. etc. Strict orders to layoff the pancakes to be lighter afoot have been given.
Guest Posted March 5, 2011 Posted March 5, 2011 *sigh* ... I guess that most of you have never heard of "Waltzing Matilda".
Recommended Posts