Is There Any Genuine Photographic Evidence Of Bf Nests/bedding?

[yowiie]

Does anyone have any legitimate pictures of BF nests

No stick stuctures, please

[Guest]

I don't think there are any that can be considered legitimate considering how we don't even know if the creature is real.

[yowiie]

Let me refraise the question

Is there any photographic evidence of nest structures that are beleived to be constructed by BF

[Guest]

Then there are plenty, but I'm not putting too much stock into those. We don't know who made that, it could be bigfoot, but it could also be a human. Search it up on BFRO and google.

Edited August 5, 2012 by zoala

[Guest okiesquatchartist]

I don't think there are any that can be considered legitimate considering how we don't even know if the creature is real.

Hi Zoala! Who is "we?" Because I know that the squatch exists. I've seen one buddy and there was no mistaking what I saw. "We" is kind of broad to be using...lol.

[yowiie]

I could, but I would like to see what there is on this forum

[TD-40]

this group has found a huge nest and in this video they show one of them:

Here is the follow up:

Edited August 5, 2012 by TD-40

[Guest]

There are many photos that are speculated to be of a BF Night Nest or bedding, but these have yet to be proven to be made by a Sasquatch, and I don't have much personal faith in them.

[Guest]

When I say "we", I am referring to the scientific community. I cannot speak for the number of eyewitnesses because I wasn't there and even if I was, I can still be mistaken.

[Guest]

When I say "we", I am referring to the scientific community. I cannot speak for the number of eyewitnesses because I wasn't there and even if I was, I can still be mistaken.

That's a valid point, Zoala. However, I am sure "We" will spin heads a little bit when the DNA studies are eventually published.

[Guest]

Well, those DNA studies aren't out yet and I personally don't have too much faith in that because the last time stuff like this was done, they either came back inconclusive or it was a known species. Also, the DNA study results are taking way too long.

[Guest]

Well, those DNA studies aren't out yet and I personally don't have too much faith in that because the last time stuff like this was done, they either came back inconclusive or it was a known species. Also, the DNA study results are taking way too long.

Agreed on that point, I don't have much faith in them either. I was reading the news yesterday and there was en Examiner article where one of the people that was doing a parallel to the Sykes study was "extremely excited by the results." Anyway, back to nests.

[Guest]

Those nests are very similar to the stuff that survivalists build. If anything I would say Bear Grylls went by and drank his own urine.

Edited August 5, 2012 by zoala

[yowiie]

I am not up to date on the number of Bf sightings in the USA/canada that occurs in these areas annually, but it would have to be well in the hundreds, if not more .

Bf can cover there tracks, hide there scat and appear invisible themselves, but there bed structures are a different kettle of fish. They do make these structures and they do use them and they do return top these structures on a regular basis, so why hasn't anything legitimate been found. With as many sightings that are reported surely evidence like this must be everywhere.

[Midnight Owl]

The Bigfoot are masters at using forest materials for cover and concealment. What is passed by and discounted as just a pile of branches and leaves is actually a safe hiding place, to observe and study those who have wondered into their forest location.

I have attached several marked photos of mine as a case in point. It was taken from the wooded area of my first visual encounter several years ago. There is a well hidden observer watching me as I took the picture. They are very, very good at hiding......