Guest Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 The national basketball association. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cowlitz2 Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Team Bigfoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 A "run". Because, run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 A Gang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steenburg Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Having not read all of this thread, I have no idea if this has been suggested or not. But myself, I have always used the single term whether you are talking about 1 subject or a number of subjects. Like moose or deer. He saw 1 moose, then he saw 3 moose. Not moose's. The witness saw 1 Sasquatch, he saw 3 Sasquatch. The US term Bigfoot sounds a little stranger when talking about more than 1, but same applies as far as I am concerned. He saw 1 Bigfoot, He saw 3 Bigfoot. This is just my opinion. Thomas Steenburg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steenburg Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 OK I have just reviewed this thread and I see this is more in fun rather than serious so here is another suggestion of what to call when more than 1 is reported together. "Another missed great photo opportunity of Bigfoot" Thomas Steenburg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 It has already been established that they are a tribe. Why would we change that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 A family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Having not read all of this thread, I have no idea if this has been suggested or not. But myself, I have always used the single term whether you are talking about 1 subject or a number of subjects. Like moose or deer. He saw 1 moose, then he saw 3 moose. Not moose's. The witness saw 1 Sasquatch, he saw 3 Sasquatch. The US term Bigfoot sounds a little stranger when talking about more than 1, but same applies as far as I am concerned. He saw 1 Bigfoot, He saw 3 Bigfoot. This is just my opinion. Thomas Steenburg i concur! i never say bigfeets:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 What's this "we" stuff? I personally think they should be called a "group". Because if you see more than one, you know that it's a "group" of hoaxers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 What's this "we" stuff? I personally think they should be called a "group". Because if you see more than one, you know that it's a "group" of hoaxers. the party supply house had a half off sale on gorilla suits eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) A Yodel of Yeti. A Yelp of Yeren. A Howl of Sasquatch. Edited April 13, 2013 by Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clubbedfoot Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Trouble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 A groom of Bigfoot. A tribe? A gonkle? Burrito? A sole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yowiie Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 Thats easy, we call them YOWIES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts