Guest Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) That couple was living in the woods for 6 years and they have a cell phone? In it they say a BF ate an entire deer, but police found no bones or blood? Yes grest place to start a hoax. They had a cellphone, but with probably no "service" most cellphones are equipped to be able to dial 911, even if there is no service connected to the phone. For all we know they could of found the cellphone in the trash or chunked on the side of the road. I don't believe they saw bf eat the entire deer, they saw him carrying the carcass of the deer. Why would the police find the bones of the deer if they couldn't find the bigfoot? Blood.....how do you know the police did not find any blood? Have you been privy to the police report that followed this call? Edited February 16, 2013 by simplyskyla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest njjohn Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Because Rick himself said so, and went as far to explain that was Minnow's camera that caught the entire thing. He did have that camera in another video that he made mocking someone who spoofed him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) Is that THE tent or do other people in his group use similar, is that from camp A, B or C? Cisco did not find where they camped. Where is the rib nailed to the tree?lol! Further more, how do you know that is from that expedition and did Rick say that the camera's in this picture belonged to the fim company? Question....if rick says that is all of minnow's equipment next t his tent.....why would they of laid all of their equipment next to his tent, instead of their own. Logically speaking.....that makes no sense. ( as many have also mentioned, you dont want to just leave expensive equipment like that laying around ) Uummm, I don't mean to be contrary, but how about the tent video? Oh i'm sorry, yes let's add another fake "video" to the list of what RD has produced. lol One fake photo...one fake video and lots of jabbin'. Edited February 16, 2013 by simplyskyla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WldHrtRnch Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) Further more, how do you know that is from that expedition and did Rick say that the camera's in this picture belonged to the fim company? screen capture from RD's blog, yes, he says it is Minnow's equipment, in response to SKs. Edited February 16, 2013 by WldHrtRnch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hawk-o Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 The naysayers grasping at straws,haphazardly placed cameras, old articles, and ground angles. SURE FIRE WAY NOT TO GET AN INVITE TO THE BIG BIGFOOT PARTY IN VEGAS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 ^ Thanks WldHrtRnch, that clarifies things. but to njjohn and Skyla, I really do not think that the cameras on the ground, off the ground, wherever they may be , make a difference. The naysayers grasping at straws,haphazardly placed cameras, old articles, and ground angles. SURE FIRE WAY NOT TO GET AN INVITE TO THE BIG BIGFOOT PARTY IN VEGAS! lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 ^ Thanks WldHrtRnch, that clarifies things. but to njjohn and Skyla, I really do not think that the cameras on the ground, off the ground, wherever they may be , make a difference. lol! I'm sure there is a song somewhere in that..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I just peeked at the artsts rendition and Dyer is slightlt uphill from the Bf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WldHrtRnch Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 LOL @ Hawk, I can assure you, I wouldn't go if I did get an invite. BF or not, the last thing in the world I care to do is spend any time around RD. But I do expect photos of you in your sequins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hawk-o Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I just peeked at the artsts rendition and Dyer is slightlt uphill from the Bf. Thats all the proof I need! Got my dancing shoes on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 The naysayers grasping at straws,haphazardly placed cameras, old articles, and ground angles. SURE FIRE WAY NOT TO GET AN INVITE TO THE BIG BIGFOOT PARTY IN VEGAS! Yeah I am trying to work out what my outfit will be...........nothing too British...no tweed or anything.....a bit of bling maybe......? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) LOL @ Hawk, I can assure you, I wouldn't go if I did get an invite. BF or not, the last thing in the world I care to do is spend any time around RD. But I do expect photos of you in your sequins. No you have to go and see for yourself because the sequins might be CGI! Thats all the proof I need! Got my dancing shoes on! You so crazy!lol Edited February 16, 2013 by VioletX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Has anyone seen a response by Dr. Meldrum and whether he will make the trip to Vegas? I may have missed it in trying to stay current with this thread, but I can't find any confirmation. As I understand it, Dr. Meldrum was, in fact, invited to see the "body". Has he accepted? I mean no disrespect to Derek. I don't know you personally, and I do respect you simply based on the support provided by others on this forum, but I know who Dr. Meldrum is, and I respect his opinion above almost all others. If he thinks this is worth looking at, I may have to pay more attention to this story. No problem I sincerely hope Dr Meldrum accompanies me as well. I spoke to him right after the invite and urged him to go with me. I have a good reputation in the research world, and I'm willing to risk that to get to the truth. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. I'm fully aware that him going with me would be a slam dunk, but I'm quite sure he will give it a lot of though before he puts himself out there for all the obvious reasons. As far as I'm concerned, you have to take a chance in this field of research or you never get anywhere. If you rule out everything as a hoax you'll never leave your driveway. This is a unique situation for me because it's no harm no foul for me to go. If I'm allowed to go and the offer stands I will evaluate what I see to the very best of my ability. That's all I can do. Then I will return and be 100% honest about what I've seen. I don't know how much I'll be allowed to say depending on the legal paperwork I have to sign. I've heard that Muskey's in a little hot water because he said to much, and I will not let that happen to me. I'll strictly follow any and all guidelines laid out for me to the T. Obviously I won't come back with proof, unless he lets me obtain a sample, but I will come back with an honest opinion of what I've seen and experienced. DR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest njjohn Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Did I once say the camera on the ground mattered? You did, when you questioned whether it really was the tent. Then because it's proven it is, oh it doesn't matter. Those "straws" are physical flaws in the story that have been showing up since this all started. You can't even produce a single straw to drain the kool-aid you've been sipping. Just a single one. Give one solid piece of evidence that even lends to the possibility that this could be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) Did I once say the camera on the ground mattered? You did, when you questioned whether it really was the tent. Then because it's proven it is, oh it doesn't matter. Those "straws" are physical flaws in the story that have been showing up since this all started. You can't even produce a single straw to drain the kool-aid you've been sipping. Just a single one. Give one solid piece of evidence that even lends to the possibility that this could be true. my question was related to whether it was the tent in the location of the shooting, or another trip or in camp A,B, or C in relation to the logistics of the shooting. Some of my question is answered, so the rest will have to wait. But I was not really concerned about these factors anyway. I trust that Musky and the FB/FB guys are not hoaxers. @ Derek Thanks for keeping us posted. Edited February 16, 2013 by VioletX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts