Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) I don't read that blog. Can you give me the gist? Edited to add: Okay, the article you linked was sent to me. Man, you folks work fast. Thank you All I am saying is I have never heard of Dr. Bindernagel being on the Carter Property. But, also, I was told she sold the farm some years ago - but then she also said "Fox" followed her to Indiana - and also that Ohio Bigfoot Conference spoken about above. I do know Igor Burtsev has spent a whole lot of time on the Carter Farm - before it was sold.. Also, Dr. Bindernagel said he had his first sighting in Kentucky - does Janice live in Kentucky? Maybe "fox and friends" followed her there? All I can tell you is what I have been told. That whole story is so twisted and "out there" - who knows what's true and what is not. But, I am not going to call anyone an outright liar - I believe that would get me thrown off this site for good. Is it possible someone is messing with whomever wrote that article? Yep. The person who publishes the blog never fact checks anything. So, yeah - it is very possible that blog is being messed with. But, who knows. Edited December 19, 2012 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 The biologist could be john mionzinski? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) It could be anyone, Kings Canyon. The more I read this - the more I am sure this is a joke that the blog published.. If the "anonymous" emailer was brought to the property to see Fox die - because his testimony would lend credibility - why wouldn't he add his name to the email? Why wouldn't he want his name attached to this? That's why the anonymous e-mailer was chosen to witness this event... This is probably someone who Sally Ramey spoke to in confidence about an event she claimed to be apart of - and this person took it to the next level - which forced Sally to come out and either admit or deny it. There is this whole new love of gossip these days, within this community - and people have been making it up if they can't find it. Which is why I don't read this particular blog. Of course, these are just my opinions. Edited to add: If it turns out that Dr. Bindernagel had given this mess of a story any time at all - I would be shocked.. Edited December 19, 2012 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 If he was that much of a friend to humans, maybe he'd like to be of more use, since he no longer needs that body. We do need it. Don't you mean, "want it"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) Dig him up and we'll see, right? Edited to add - need it, want it, same thing. We need it to prove bigfoot's existence to the scientific community, we want it to say "eat crow, you naysayers"! Edited December 19, 2012 by madison5716 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) Well Madison5716 - did you know Janice Carter claims there is a baby bigfoot buried on the farm? She could have given that up years ago. But, nadda. Also, I believe - Fox was never described as a "friend to humans" by Janice. Anyone can correct me - but if memory serves Janice has stated many times of all the bigfoot on her property - Fox was the one that scared her the most. Edited December 19, 2012 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasfooty Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Last time I heard, grave robbing isn't socially acceptable....even if the person in the grave is of a different race. If they're a relic hominid, that would make the grave an archaeological site at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thermalman Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I would agree totally, with regards to the human race. But how is digging up a dead animal wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 All I know is what I read. And if there is any bf news the guy at bf evidence will have it. True or not. From the follow up on it yesterday there is an email from Janice Carter (claimed). States "she and her youngest daughter, Sally Ramey" were there. Is that Janice, the daughter, and Sally? Or Sally is her daughter? Either way you have a wild story tied to Ketchum twice. Sally and Igor. And idk on the John. Could be mioncynski? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kerchak Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 The Fox account said that they brought offerings and one of them was a bag of tobacco, which Fox dumped the entire contents into his mouth and then ate peanut butter with it. Well no wonder he's flippin' dead then. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted December 19, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted December 19, 2012 I would agree totally, with regards to the human race. But how is digging up a dead animal wrong? Humans are Animals, but for some moral reason we don't in general dig them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Re-read it. Sally is not her daughter. Still questions to answer though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thermalman Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Humans are Animals, but for some moral reason we don't in general dig them up. I suppose. But, owing a landscaping company, we do find past pet remains or other old bones when we dig around in yards. So far, no human remains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Well - if we go with the "Bigfoot is Human" discussion - then I would say digging up an alleged grave of a baby bigfoot could expose Janice to other problems she hadnt considered ---- like the improper burial of a human being and not reporting that death to the authorities. This works both ways folks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted December 19, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted December 19, 2012 The biologist could be john mionzinski? Pretty sure he's American and not Canadian.. Well - if we go with the "Bigfoot is Human" discussion - then I would say digging up an alleged grave of a baby bigfoot could expose Janice to other problems she hadnt considered ---- like the improper burial of a human being and not reporting that death to the authorities. This works both ways folks I don't know but i'd find it hard to see how someone could get done for not reporting the death of a human being, before the subject was in fact classed as a human being. But there's loads of if's and but's with this, it sure could be a mess.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts