Guest SoFla Posted February 16, 2013 Posted February 16, 2013 Sunday Night...starts at 1:00 AM on the east Coast http://www.coasttocoastam.com/
Guest Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 Are we going to hear Days... Not weeks? Or more weeks... Not Months?
Guest Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 And only the first half of the show? Got somewhere else to be? Use all the time you have available! George better give some tough questions and not use kid gloves and softball questions.
bipedalist Posted February 17, 2013 BFF Patron Posted February 17, 2013 (edited) ^ He or one of his assoc. saw the paper in advance and has known the conclusions for some time: Monograph? Or, peer-reviewed and passed paper from Journal of XXXXXXx Zoological whatever then presented in the self-purchased storefront of a new online open source journal requiring purchase? George could ask her which specific journals rejected her outright, requested revisions and/or did she remove her paper from due to other considerations.... also? Edited February 17, 2013 by bipedalist
Guest Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 (edited) I hope the interviewer throws her real deal hardball questions and does not toss her snowballs. Perhaps some of the below would be helpful in getting a view of the picture we don't get to see- Where are the habituators hard data to back up the Forest People claims since the DNA is not being accepted well by the scientific community? Besides Adrian are there any clear photographs and HD video? How can she expect the government to protect a species that is still not proven to exist? How can she make the claim that they are so similar to us (exluding DNA findings?) when real primatologists and anthropologist have not studied them? How does she come to that conclusion? During the course of the 5 years did you ever reach out to people like Ian Redmund, Anna Nekaris, Meldrum, Bindernagel, Sarmiento, Schaeller, Todd Disotell or Goodall? Even though they are not all geneticists they do have resources and reputations that could carry a larger flag. How much money personal $ did David Paulides invest in the study? Is Adrian Erickson happy with the way this study has been unveiled to the world and is he thanking you for a job well done? Is Wally appreciating his thank you cards from the Facebook fans that you asked them to send if they felt so inclined? Have you been contacted by National Geographic or Discovery Channel for more information. Why was the work not independantly verified before publication? Why do you think The Olympic Project and The Erickson Project not posted links back to the Denovo Journal or the Sasquatch Genome Project? Why have many of the big name sponsors not joined her publicly on her call for legislation to protect the sasaquatch people? Where are your personal pictures from your interactions at your study sights? The picture of the hair twirled on the horses mane, how is that supporting information that sasquatch is real to the scientific community? Is Wally still supporting any of your work going forward? Will the money raised from those purchaing the article go towards paying back Wally or Adrian? Will Wally and Adrian recieve any compensation for any of your future sales projects such as clothing lines, patented primers or DNA ID kits for sasquatch? Besides the Smeja sample are there any Erickson and Olympic Projects samples left to study by the independant team? Has there been any talk or threats of lawsuits since November 24th , 2012 from any of the financial backers or sample submitters? I could go on and on and on and on and... Edited February 17, 2013 by Polypodium
bipedalist Posted February 17, 2013 BFF Patron Posted February 17, 2013 (edited) The biggest one, have you signed any contracts with David Paulides to market literature, documents, books, cd's etc. ? Where can we read public corporate accountability records of your purchase of the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Zoology or it's various incarnations, perturbations and shells prior to the DeNovo Scientific re-incarnation? Edited February 17, 2013 by bipedalist 1
Guest BartloJays Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 Bet you a dime to a donut, for obvious reasons, this show will be a walk in the park and she's likely only going to see beachballs. My prediction is the little perception bump she gets will be short-lived absent any sustaining substance to what's she's presented and how
Guest Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 I have 3 questions: Where's the video? The video? Do you know where it is? Is there any chance we could see that video you promised?
Guest gershake Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 She didn't promise any video. The video is Erickson's, to whom it is up to release as he pleases. The only thing that was ever said was that the video wouldn't be released before the DNA study was out. This has held up as a true statement.
Guest Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 She said she had HD video that she would release with the paper, which she did. The problem is everybody expected something a lot more definitive than that teaser.
Guest feverdreams Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 And only the first half of the show? Got somewhere else to be? Use all the time you have available! George better give some tough questions and not use kid gloves and softball questions. I dont think anybody gets given a tough time on coast to coast ever. I mean I find it interesting sometimes, but the hosts always just give the person free rein to say whatever they want without challenging it.
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) Biscardi did. George Norry ripped him a new one and won't allow him on c2c anymore. But that was Norry, Ketchum is dealing with Knapp, who's been pimping this study for awhile now. Edited February 18, 2013 by squatting squatch
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 She didn't promise any video. The video is Erickson's, to whom it is up to release as he pleases. The only thing that was ever said was that the video wouldn't be released before the DNA study was out. This has held up as a true statement. This is the interview I recall hearing: “We have at our disposal Hi-Def footage that will not be released until which time the publication is finished,†she said. “Hi-Def video of some sasquatch it’s quite remarkable. It’s amazing.†http://myfox8.com/2012/12/01/texas-researcher-claims-to-have-dna-proving-that-bigfoot-is-real/
Guest gershake Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Touché. I retract my previous comments. This whole thing is a mess.
Recommended Posts