Is There A Video That Could End The Speculation?

[Guest DWA]

^^^^For sure.  The past 45 years are enough evidence to sink the crafty-10-y-o theory.

[Incorrigible1]

That's not true, if it was there would be tons of videos like that already. The truth is very few people can create something that would be convincing, and even then there would be tell-tale signs of CGI. A good high quality video would still be very valuable evidence.

 

Ah, but there are those that insist no video could assist in vetting the existence of the creature, and to suggest anyone with the opportunity to film such nets you only teeth gnashing and catcalls of "get your own." They then assign fantastic abilities to the creature, and keep to their own little clique where logic may not be permitted.

[Guest]

Ah, but there are those that insist no video could assist in vetting the existence of the creature, and to suggest anyone with the opportunity to film such nets you only teeth gnashing and catcalls of "get your own."

 

 

Yup, and those people  either don't understand anything about CGI, or they're making excuses. That's ok though, a lot of people just don't realize how expensive high quality CGI is. It takes large teams of people, and even larger rendering farms to render it. But even when you have those resources at your disposal, it still wouldn't hold up to scrutiny.

 

 

They then assign fantastic abilities to the creature, and keep to their own little clique where logic may not be permitted.

 

That should tell you all you need to know about those people.

Edited August 25, 2013 by rocket10

[indiefoot]

Whether a video would satisfy the few hard core skeptics who stalk BFdom, who cares. If it's good enough to make the everyday Sally and Joe out there sit up and take notice it's good enough to make science pay attention. Once a sizable percentage of the population is convinced the government will follow along.

Edited August 26, 2013 by See-Te-Cah NC
Word Edit

[roguefooter]

^^ The "can't be released" was because he respected the position of the one who allowed him to see it. Plain and simple.

 

I was talking about in general when people do this, not with his case specifically. It comes across as shady because if you know the owner wants to keep it out of the public eye, then why make it a public spectacle?