Guest Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 is BF too smart to get caught ? heck, so far its been too smart to be proven to exist. so who knows, it might carry off all kinds of victims......or not. I suspect about the only way to know would to be in the wrong place / wrong time. Yeah, But then you would probably not be around to tell anyone of your encounter/discovery/adventure....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 (edited) To be fair David never links bf to the files, with that said what do Indian tales tell us? Does bf take people? Yes Does bf eat people? Yes A whole host of reasons could answer why, including predation, sexual attraction and surrogate motherly instincts. As well as defense of mate, young, territory or even retaliation. Well said, and I agree with you, as frightening as your statement is, I believe it to be true. I really have stopped camping and hiking since my sighting of a Dogman or a Wolfman beside the road in the Davy Crockett National Forest. I'm pretty much helpless against a creature like that, and I do not want my hubby torn apart protecting me. Coonbo I am assuming that the Ky incident you are refering to is the family that was supposedly killed at Land Between the Lakes? Wasn't that supposed to be a wolf or dogman that did that? Do you have any info that isn't online that you would be willing to share about that incident or the Ohio incident that you mentioned at the end of your post. You have peaked my interest and I would love to know more if your willing to tell it. Thanks. Ky Woodsman, I was able to look it up online. I live in Kentucky, and have been to the Land Between the Lakes many times, but thankfully we never camped. Whatever killed that family may have been able to walk on 2 feet occasionally since the baby girl's body was draped over a limb up in a tree, and weird footprints were observed. I and others believe that a Dog/Wolf/man killed that family. Edited April 4, 2014 by SweetSusiq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 You have never had a positive experience with another human being? I am so sorry. Many people (and I am one of them) can testify -- and have testified -- to having had joyful, positive ongoing interactions with Sasquatch people. So your observation -- that it's naive to expect that people can have "neighborly" experiences with Sasquatch people -- is itself naive, and shows a lack of familiarity with the literature and a strange contempt for people who post about their positive experiences on this very forum on a regular basis! Everyone who has an experience with a Sasquatch person has a piece of the puzzle. (You have had very valuable things to add to the puzzle, in my opinion.) To extrapolate the whole from that tiny piece, however, is not advisable. LeafTalker, Everyone that I know who has relationships with the Sasquatch only have relationships with the "Patty" type of Sasquatch. I know of no one who has become friendly with a Wolfman, nor a Dogman. Those Dog/Wolfman types of BF seem to be much more aggressive and dangerous to us humans than the Patty type seems to be towards us. However, I never wish to meet any type of them if they are in a bad mood, or have had an unpleasant encounter with a human who shot or injured them or their family member because then I believe all types could and would be dangerous to us. Does anyone know of any info regarding BF becoming more dangerous because of bad human interactions; something/anything that is specific? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgerm Posted April 5, 2014 Author Share Posted April 5, 2014 Some where I mentioned a report of a BF tearing a hiking guide apart after he shot a BF. This was done in front of his hiking party that he was taking along an Oregon trail. We know what the Black Bear does when humans are spotted which is run except when they are pissed or hungry. The same applies for BF in my opinion. Bears can become friendly with people if enough time is spent with them, and I predict the same applies to BF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alex MW Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 Some where I mentioned a report of a BF tearing a hiking guide apart after he shot a BF. This was done in front of his hiking party that he was taking along an Oregon trail. We know what the Black Bear does when humans are spotted which is run except when they are pissed or hungry. The same applies for BF in my opinion. Bears can become friendly with people if enough time is spent with them, and I predict the same applies to BF. Even the dogmen won't harm you unless you shoot. I would imagine that many who see them are more apt to shoot vs a big that has the face or the gaze of a man. The bigs won't harm you. At most they may scare you with their usual stuff of intimidation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgerm Posted April 7, 2014 Author Share Posted April 7, 2014 How do we know that Bigfoot or the Dogman only harm humans after being shot? Do they police their own species and kill or imprison the homocidal individuals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alex MW Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 I just know statistically I should have been killed by now if they did. I cant even tell you how many hours and in different locations I ve been and encountered the bigs at the very least. I suspect the dog men arent that rare so they were probably in many of these locations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 May I loan you a camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alex MW Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Nope i carry a recorder and my eyes. I prefer to experience rather than practice futility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 As was to be expected. Thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alex MW Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 lol if it was that easy I guess you d have pictures of them all over this forum. it is not. plus i am into their speech so getting them to come in close is critical for recording. just my thing man if Rusty from downunder cant get a pic w his elaborate setups then id say it is pretty darn tough. Now i may try to do thermals but that will never prove anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasfooty Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 He offered to loan me a camera in 2010, AMW. I gratefully accepted, but as expected, I haven't seen it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alex MW Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 LOL I was actually going to accept it myself. Hey, I can use a camera But thanks for saving me my request Sasfooty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 He offered to loan me a camera in 2010, AMW. I gratefully accepted, but as expected, I haven't seen it yet. Yep, you've heard more wildcat fights (invisible) than cameras sent by me. Sorry 'bout that. Not the camera..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasfooty Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Wanna give that one a little more thought & try it again, Inc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts