bipedalist Posted March 12, 2015 BFF Patron Posted March 12, 2015 (edited) Does the wildlife services agency serve as the Black Ops BF and other predator extermination program for the Feds? http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedamage http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedamage/!ut/p/a1/jZC7DoJAEEW_hpYdEAHtQJSnSkOAbQwYXEiAJbDK7wt0Jroy3UzOSe5chFGCcJu9KpKxirZZPe9YvXlXR5ZMkF3bPprgXk5BqPmeDJIyASkH8Lfr_INtOIoWAICiy-BapmNpuzOAq67z4ccY8M-PEeYi8wcLwIu4AJwMHsKkpvnSZ2q0-UYnCPfFo-iLXnz207lkrBv2AggwjqNIKCV1Id5pI8A3paQDQ8knibomihKowibWhzdKJCRB/?1dmy&urile=wcm%3apath%3a%2FAPHIS_Content_Library%2FSA_Our_Focus%2FSA_Wildlife_Damage%2FSA_Operational_Activities%2F Better known as the wolf killing wing of the hired gun sniper wing under USDA control, does this agency extend down to predators that walk on two legs and have hominini potential? Is BF considered the ultimate "invasive species"? Health and Safety, protecting property and agriculture. Protecting rogue political agenda? How deep is it? Does the animal health wing of this agency have the responsibility to determine the protocol once BF contact is made? http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/emergencyresponse/!ut/p/a1/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfGjzOK9_D2MDJ0MjDzd3V2dDDz93HwCzL29jAw8zYEKIvEo8DYlTr-zu6OHibmPgYGBiQVQ2MXJw8Xc0tfAwNOMOP0GOICjASH94fpReJWAfABWgM-JYAV43FCQGxoaYZDpCQC0YZPF/?1dmy&urile=wcm%3apath%3a%2Faphis_content_library%2Fsa_our_focus%2Fsa_emergency_response%2Fsa_landing_page%2Fsa_spotlights%2Fct_animals Lots of meat on them bones. Edited March 12, 2015 by bipedalist
bipedalist Posted March 12, 2015 BFF Patron Author Posted March 12, 2015 Interesting .pdf on carcass management and which agencies do what. Would be interesting to backtrack on the Mt. St. Helen's removal incident with cargo nets and helicopters putatively removing BF on this one: Carcass management table.pdf
Guest JiggyPotamus Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 I've read that US special forces guys would train in Australia, shooting kangaroos from helicopters. Apparently they had a kangaroo problem or something, not really sure. If there was such a bigfoot elimination program in the US, obviously we would be told nothing about it, considering that telling us about it would probably put a stop to such an operation. I have no great explanation for why the government would wish to keep bigfoot a secret, much less eliminate the animals. But if they were keeping them a secret, perhaps they know something we don't. Surely they wouldn't attempt to eliminate sasquatch just so the animals aren't scientifically proven at some point in the future...perhaps a body is found or whatever. Although a program of secrecy might shed light on a program of elimination, and vice-versa, the few reasons that have been proposed for such a course are not that strong. There is the idea of limiting certain industries which utilize or require large tracts of forest-land; then there is the potential for a drop in revenue in national parks and wildlife areas; there would have to be funds allocated for the study and protection of such animals, which might limit the wildlife budget in other areas; there is the potential for panic among a percentage of the population; then there is an explanation that is often not given the importance it deserves, that being that government agencies do not like to admit when they are not in control. They would be embarrassed if they had to come out and admit that they were too inept to know a population of extremely large animals was right under their nose for all these years, without the government ever knowing. Are any of these reasons motivation enough for a program of sasquatch elimination? Are there reasons I did not mention which might explain such behavior?
Lake County Bigfooot Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 (edited) If a Sasquatch was known to have taken a person for consumption, or to toy with it like a cat...my cats routinely kill mice just playing with them, kind of like in Flowers for Algernon or was it the Grapes of Wrath?, the big guy kills the mouse just trying to hold it, did not know his own strength. Squatch might be guilty of that from time to time, as well as just deciding to try a little protein booster, hey the big guys gotta keep up with all that muscle mass. I did not fault the bear that ate that guy (Timothy Treadwell) in Canada who thought he could live with the bears peacefully, there was a very poignant documentary on that ordeal, sad thing is the guys girlfriend just happened to be paying a visit and also wound up on the menu. Regardless of how close in likeness to us you think these creatures are, you have to respect that they might just decide to harvest a few of your vital organs, certainly not the normal behavior they exhibit, but it makes sense to me that humans would at times be a viable alternative source of protein. So....If you have a Bear that eats humans only once, it is likely to get a taste for it, and thus if identified the Bear is destroyed, nothing unusual, well would this not also be the case with a Sasquatch with a taste for our fat livers, we might be pretty yummy on the inside. The only difference is the amount of lethal force needed to take out a rouge Sasquatch, if such a thing even exists and the Government even knows of it, well that is allot of ifs, but if you believe the reports on Sasquatch Chronicles, special forces has been brought in to take them out in certain cases. Edited March 13, 2015 by Lake County Bigfooot
Cotter Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 kind of like in Flowers for Algernon or was it the Grapes of Wrath?, the big guy kills the mouse just trying to hold it, did not know his own strength. Of Mice and Men. ;-) Are the Wildlife services above associated with the Dept of the Interior?
Lake County Bigfooot Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 ^^^^Ya that's it, getting old, did to many things to my brain in my youth.^^^^
norseman Posted March 13, 2015 Admin Posted March 13, 2015 It's well documented that the Washington fish and game shoots wolves..... http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2012/sep/27/helicopter-gunner-kills-6th-wedge-pack-wolf-effort-concludes-alpha-male-female-dead/
Guest Crowlogic Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 (edited) Once again we have a perfect conspiracy. Various governmental divisions have been killing bigfoot for decades and not a single atom of one of those dead bigfoot has ever found it's way into the light of public scrutiny. Why should that some be a more airtight case than any other conspiracy that falls to whistle blowers? I find it curious that in China their bigfoot like creature has received an official nod for study but it remains just as non proven as our surrounded by conspiracy bigfoot. Bigfoot does not require a conspiracy to remain unknown. A far more basic reason is responsible for that. Edited March 13, 2015 by Crowlogic
bipedalist Posted March 14, 2015 BFF Patron Author Posted March 14, 2015 Of Mice and Men. ;-) Are the Wildlife services above associated with the Dept of the Interior? USDA == Agriculture, different cabinet agency but I'm wondering if they wouldn't do the dirty work for many allied government sectors?
Guest sixxgunner Posted March 14, 2015 Posted March 14, 2015 This is an interesting topic. I would like to read more about this. Thanks for the post!
SWWASAS Posted March 14, 2015 BFF Patron Posted March 14, 2015 Once again we have a perfect conspiracy. Various governmental divisions have been killing bigfoot for decades and not a single atom of one of those dead bigfoot has ever found it's way into the light of public scrutiny. Why should that some be a more airtight case than any other conspiracy that falls to whistle blowers? I find it curious that in China their bigfoot like creature has received an official nod for study but it remains just as non proven as our surrounded by conspiracy bigfoot. Bigfoot does not require a conspiracy to remain unknown. A far more basic reason is responsible for that. In China the government believes what their park rangers and civilians report enough to establish preserves to protect what they believe is an endangered and rare species. Mainly because if you lie to the government there, you will end up in prison or with a bullet in your head. If we held our government officials to the same standard we could know what they know.
Guest Posted March 14, 2015 Posted March 14, 2015 The problem with governmental conspiracy theories is that it enables us to fill in the gaps conveniently when a story doesn't quite add up. Having said that, I find it more than easy to imagine something like this happening. Of course, even if Bigfoot is officially discovered, I very much doubt stories of "black ops exterminators" would ever be released to the public. This would be an even more shadowy facet of already murky waters...
SWWASAS Posted March 15, 2015 BFF Patron Posted March 15, 2015 There are many historical events the government has tried to keep from the public. Our government basically conducted genocide at times on the Native American populations, killing men, women, and children. The orders given to military commanders were basically if they resist, kill everyone. If they have been doing the same thing with BF populations, this day and age it would be even more important to keep that from the public.
daveedoe Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 wonder if any Bigfoot has ever been radio collared!
Recommended Posts