Guest Silver Fox Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 One more thing: The first BF shot in Plumas County by the hunter was reportedly a female. The second one was a juvenile. So apparently a female BF and her child were shot by the hunter. There was a 3rd BF that reportedly survived, but we don't know if it made it through the winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 I really hope that this story doesnt get in the way of the DNA study publication. Anybody with some common sense already knew that this was somehow legit (flesh from a BF), just read the first responses by derekfoot, it directly implies that most is true but the dead BFs in a freezer. But no, the whole community is f**** around someone who might very likely go to jail now! And he might go there because he just did what we all dreamed of, got a good sample (hard evidence), of something he didnt even kill intentionally, if he killed it at all! Such stupid things destroy so much and gain that less, its a shame!!!!!!!!!!!! Its about finding BF and not CSI-Miami!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) I really hope that this story doesnt get in the way of the DNA study publication. Anybody with some common sense already knew that this was somehow legit (flesh from a BF), just read the first responses by derekfoot, it directly implies that most is true but the dead BFs in a freezer. But no, the whole community is f**** around someone who might very likely got under investigation now! And he might get it because he just did what we all dreamed of, got a good sample (hard evidence), of something he didnt even kill intentionally, if he killed it at all! Such stupid things destroy so much and gain that less, its a shame!!!!!!!!!!!! Its about finding BF and not CSI-Miami!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edited June 28, 2011 by Data Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted June 28, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted June 28, 2011 Ken Walker is the guy that gave the interview because he knew about the situation, but It wasn't him, and I can guarantee the blog was not accurate. My guess is Erickson put him up to it. Gee, lets try to trash the Olympic project and leak a bunch of stuff. Then all focus can be on the Erickson project. That's what you want isn't it Adrian? Go ahead and give me a call tomorrow big A, I got a lot to say to you fella. If that's the case, it's a reprehensible tactic aimed at your team. However, if it's some kind of trial balloon offered by someone just to stir up stuff to allay the boredom it seemed to have worked. If there is any other purpose to the trial balloon I believe it probably will be known eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silver Fox Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 I really hope that this story doesnt get in the way of the DNA study publication. Anybody with some common sense already knew that this was somehow legit (flesh from a BF), just read the first responses by derekfoot, it directly implies that most is true but the dead BFs in a freezer. But no, the whole community is f**** around someone who might very likely got under investigation now! And he might get it because he just did what we all dreamed of, got a good sample (hard evidence), of something he didnt even kill intentionally, if he killed it at all! Such stupid things destroy so much and gain that less, its a shame!!!!!!!!!!!! Its about finding BF and not CSI-Miami!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't think anyone is coming after the shooter. LE has better things to do here in California what with all these budget cuts. When I got ripped off from my apartment, the cops would not even come out and take a report. They sent me a report in the mail to fill out and mail back to them. What law did he violate? Shooting a BF? Shooting 2 BF's? Is that against the law? BF's don't even exist, silly. How can you go to jail for shooting something that doesn't even exist? BTW, prove it. Prove the shooter broke the law. Prove he shot 2 BF's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silver Fox Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Ken Walker is the guy that gave the interview because he knew about the situation, but It wasn't him, and I can guarantee the blog was not accurate. My guess is Erickson put him up to it. Gee, lets try to trash the Olympic project and leak a bunch of stuff. Then all focus can be on the Erickson project. That's what you want isn't it Adrian? Go ahead and give me a call tomorrow big A, I got a lot to say to you fella. I don't think Erickson put him up to it, because the interviewee was worried about Erickson finding out and calling him up and asking him why he did this. The subject did not give off the impression that he harbored any animosity towards the OP. He also did not suggest that Erickson had any animosity towards the OP. I felt this was coming from the subject himself. People are starting to get really impatient about all this EP waiting forever, and they are starting to leak stuff. Impatience motivated Stubstad's revelations too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted June 28, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted June 28, 2011 Derek - do the right thing and tell your friend to own up and go to the appropriate law enforcement people. Your friend needs to clear this up because your door WILL be the one the LEOs knock on to find out what to heck is going on. Well, it is starting to sound like things are becoming "complicated" by the phrase running on two legs while running on four legs at other times phrase anyway. ..LE has better things to do here in California what with all these budget cuts.. Maybe MIB don't If it was true I think Ketchum, Erickson and the Olympic Project guys would (have) act differently. They have wealthy sponsors like Wally Hersom or Erickson himself. If it was true these guys would have bought the bodies long ago... Hmmmm...... I really hope that this story doesnt get in the way of the DNA study publication. Anybody with some common sense already knew that this was somehow legit (flesh from a BF), just read the first responses by derekfoot, it directly implies that most is true but the dead BFs in a freezer. Double hmmmmm.......would make a good case for a publication with some good graphics but so would a nice closeup dvd of a walking female Bigfoot. A female and a juvenile in the same frame would go a long way to documentation. Again, the dna would be interesting but superfluous it would seem ... still documentation would be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) time will tell Edited June 28, 2011 by Data Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Something is still fishy... I smell someone who knew exactly what he was shooting! I think that's what's making this story smell. Also, I'm torn about whether the bodies are on ice. Wait a minute... I'd bet he either only killed, or only recovered the YOUNG BF! I can def see that being a possibility. There was no mention of flesh from two creatures being sent in. This hunter came across a young BF, knew what it was and couldn't pass up the chance to shoot one and end the mystery. Only thing is, he feels bad because it was just a kid and that shame prevents him from feeling the pure joy of having proof for the scientific community. Even if he had shot the adult BF, how would he have gotten the body out of there? He would have needed help (more talking mouths). However if it was just a kid, he could manage that on his own. All this is just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silver Fox Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 I'd bet he either only killed, or only recovered the YOUNG BF! I can def see that being a possibility. There was no mention of flesh from two creatures being sent in. The subject in the interview says that there were different samples sent in, 1+ with dirty white hair and 1+ with brown hair. The subject thought that that meant that the samples were coming from both of the BF's. But maybe Derek wants to disagree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted June 28, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted June 28, 2011 I'd imagine there are as many versions of this story going around as there are people that have now read about it or heard it. DZ your version may be as good as any....however if it did come down I'm hoping they got an intact organism without much damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Taylor Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) A DNA or tissue sample is useless as sasquatch evidence since there is no control sample. The only relevant evidence that will be accepted by mainstream scientists is a skeleton, or at a minimum, a skull. As an attorney, I can tell you that you will not be prosecuted for murder for killing a sasquatch, since they are not human. Edited June 28, 2011 by Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 A DNA or tissue sample is useless as sasquatch evidence since there is no control sample. The only relevant evidence that will be accepted by mainstream scientists is a skeleton, or at a minimum, a skull. As an attorney, I can tell you that you will not be prosecuted for murder for killing a sasquatch, since they are not human. At this present time maybe not, but what about when the doors are blown open and perhaps they have a BF on television talking to people. Hopefully people will forgive and forget the person who killed the BF that ended the mystery, but knowing folk, there will come a wailing for the guy to be prosecuted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bsruther Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 At this present time maybe not, but what about when the doors are blown open and perhaps they have a BF on television talking to people. Hopefully people will forgive and forget the person who killed the BF that ended the mystery, but knowing folk, there will come a wailing for the guy to be prosecuted. I hope they use subtitles. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Didn't anybody learn their lesson from the GA Boyz hoax? Don't pay any attention to this until there is something you can hold on to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts