Guest Crosspeg Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Check out the proportions of the Jacob's creature as it gets hit by a police cruiser. It's in 4x4 and everything. It's clear that one has a long body, studies have shown Jacob's does not no matter how many angled bear pictures that have been shown.
Guest Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Forbig, we are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one buddy. I don't see primate in that picture, and all the drawn outlines, measurements, or for that matter shouting from the rooftops wont make me see what I dont see. I contend that the picture is just not clear enough to make sure what angle it's even being viewed from, which would affect an acurate measurement of the back/spine at least. I know you dont agree, and that's fine. What I dont understand is why you seem to want to convert everyone from bear to primate. Heck, I'm 99% sure bigfoot exists, and so are a lot of the people who see a bear. I just dont see why you care so much about this picture.
Guest Forbig Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Forbig, we are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one buddy. I don't see primate in that picture, and all the drawn outlines, measurements, or for that matter shouting from the rooftops wont make me see what I dont see. I contend that the picture is just not clear enough to make sure what angle it's even being viewed from, which would affect an acurate measurement of the back/spine at least. I know you dont agree, and that's fine. What I dont understand is why you seem to want to convert everyone from bear to primate. Heck, I'm 99% sure bigfoot exists, and so are a lot of the people who see a bear. I just dont see why you care so much about this picture. I've said before this is one of my favorite sightings because if Bigfoot turns out to be a Big lie this will be one of the only ones that wasn't faked. The evidence is convincing and it's fine if you don't agree a lot of people see a juvinile Sasquatch in it other than myself.
Guest Crosspeg Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 I respect everyone’s opinion but it’s well known Sasquatch resemble bears except for their proportions. I don’t find it hard to believe a young one would be in the same place where sightings and recordings of adults were made. I believe the Pennsylvania Game Commission are the ones that got the bear wagon rolling and they had good reason to pacify the panicked public in that area. They also have a history of lying about coyotes and deer populations to the public. Maybe that’s why the people living there don’t believe them.
slabdog Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Argeed, I would also like to know why a bear would contort its body in such a ridiculous manner just to put its head to the ground in photo #2. Good question....uuhhh....why would a juvenile Bigfoot do the same?
Guest themanta Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 I've said before this is one of my favorite sightings because if Bigfoot turns out to be a Big lie this will be one of the only ones that wasn't faked. No, it will be the one that was obviously a mangy bear. The evidence is convincing opinion isn't fact
Guest themanta Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 I respect everyone’s opinion but it’s well known Sasquatch resemble bears except for their proportions. I don’t find it hard to believe a young one would be in the same place where sightings and recordings of adults were made. I believe the Pennsylvania Game Commission are the ones that got the bear wagon rolling and they had good reason to pacify the panicked public in that area. They also have a history of lying about coyotes and deer populations to the public. Maybe that’s why the people living there don’t believe them. Not in the case of a black bear, they would smaller if some of the squatch sizes are to be believed.
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Wow! Visited this subject years ago. At length. With much research. I am shocked that this thread continues into the third page all because of a mangy bear, with photo's of its cubs in different shots! This in no way helps or furthers Bigfoot research. It harms it. It lets people who happen upon this forum or others laugh, shake their heads or stare wild-eyed as they read the desperation that some believers will go to to keep their belief system safe. Please already. It's a bear....
Guest Knuck Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 (edited) Here's a twist for ya, just how many mammals have FORWARD facing knees on thier back legs? Primates do. Elephants come to mind next, And **** few others. Dogs don't, cats don't, and bears don't! The animal in the Jacobs photos does indeed appear to have forward facing knees on it's "hind" legs. Why has no one mentioned this before now?-Knuck Edited July 19, 2011 by Knuck
slabdog Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 (edited) Here's a twist for ya, just how many mammals have FORWARD facing knees on thier back legs? Primates do. Elephants come to mind next, And **** few others. Dogs don't, cats don't, and bears don't! The animal in the Jacobs photos does indeed appear to have forward facing knees on it's "hind" legs. Why has no one mentioned this before now?-Knuck (ahem) Edited July 19, 2011 by slabdog
Guest Knuck Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Nice try, but I ain't bitin! I will not swear it isn't a bear, but, there is no lower leg joint, (with rear facing knee,) visible at all above the rear foot of the so called jacobs' creature.-Knuck
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Here's a twist for ya, just how many mammals have FORWARD facing knees on thier back legs? Primates do. Elephants come to mind next, And **** few others. Dogs don't, cats don't, and bears don't! The animal in the Jacobs photos does indeed appear to have forward facing knees on it's "hind" legs. Why has no one mentioned this before now?-Knuck Really? REALLY? That's what you see? lol!
Guest Knuck Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 It's what I don't see that's the problem. It sure as H doesn't have a rear facing knee joint like a bearwould......And now, for something completely different. Have a nice day-Knuck
Guest Crosspeg Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 (edited) Nice try, but I ain't bitin! I will not swear it isn't a bear, but, there is no lower leg joint, (with rear facing knee,) visible at all above the rear foot of the so called jacobs' creature.-Knuck To me the legs and feet and heck even his butt cheecks have the same curve as the ape from the first page. Edited July 19, 2011 by Crosspeg
Guest Crosspeg Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Wow! This in no way helps or furthers Bigfoot research. It harms it. It lets people who happen upon this forum or others laugh, shake their heads or stare wild-eyed as they read the desperation that some believers will go to to keep their belief system safe. Please already. Really? I can't think of one piece of Bigfoot evidence that doesn't do that to the non believers. If you want respect you need to get one piece of proof that's all it will take to get respect. It's a Bigfoot....
Recommended Posts