Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Hello Hoosierfoot, Yes - it was the all female expedition - episode titled "Bigfoot". This is make or break week for the Ketchum project. It'll either get news coverage and some credible genetic community backing, or it'll fizzle into a non story by next weekend. I think you're right. Honestly, if there are scientists looking into her paper - as she says - maybe the lack of news coverage isn't such a bad thing though. Maybe - just maybe - they can salvage this and turn it into something worth discussing on the news.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Ya, I remember that episode. I miss that show. I thought another channel might pick it up and air it. History channel exited the Bigfoot scence just as it was heating up. Partly due to that show. That's what hooked me on the subject. It veered too far from the target with fish, hogs, snakes, etc. All bf all the time would have kept it going. Anyway..... She was still vague on C2C. It's out. Release details please. She claims bias, call em out and show it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TH68 Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) One of the other submitters spoke up : http://bf-field-journal.blogspot.com/2013/02/bigfoot-dna-study-critics-read-study.html#more Exactly There are many convicted felons doing looooooooong sentences based upon DNA hits in the national law enforcement computer bank from DNA recovered years ago. Sure you can argue contamination, but not for all samples and all blind tests which all came to the same conclusion. This is all much bigger than anyone could have ever imagined. Giganto would have been so easy. unfortunately they are extinct. What is extant are different yet related human cryptids. Unbelievable, but no more so than quantum mechanics, string theory and black holes. Just as chimps look so different than us based on less than 2 percent of their genome difference, what we call Sasquatch look very different From us and from each otherbased on their genetic difference, however small. Just imagine where we will all be on this 6 months from now. Edited February 18, 2013 by TH68 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Hoosierfoot said: She was still vague on C2C. It's out. Release details please. She claims bias, call em out and show it. I agree, because she can claim bias all she wants - but until she shows the world the bias - she just sounds like a complainer.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shoot1 Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" I think she needs to release 100% of everything she has - the paper, the samples, the documentation, emails/correspondence, throw video on a (professional looking) website and youtube, and offer interviews with anyone ASAP. I and many other people would volunteer to put it up on a *professional looking* site for free. (The sites she has now are crap.) If she's worried about financial reward and professional recognition, that will come later but only if she's right - and handles this professionally from here on. At this point in the game she should say screw academic peer review - release everything publicly and it will eventually be reviewed by thousands of scientists. Edited February 18, 2013 by shoot1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 A question for GenesRus... Do you see any way of pulling this paper out of the fire? Is there anything that is salvageable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Do you see any way of pulling this paper out of the fire? Is there anything that is salvageable? "There are reports from witnesses who allegedly live in close proximity to, and interact with, Sasquatch family units ; however, in the absence of additional evidence, most of these reports have been dismissed. These witnesses and other eyewitnesses further report that the Sasquatch also build stick structures in the forests, some of which are thought to be shelters while others have unknown meanings." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Does anyone have a link to the show last night...other than the Coast to Coast site link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 "There are reports from witnesses who allegedly live in close proximity to, and interact with, Sasquatch family units ; however, in the absence of additional evidence, most of these reports have been dismissed. These witnesses and other eyewitnesses further report that the Sasquatch also build stick structures in the forests, some of which are thought to be shelters while others have unknown meanings." Who is that quote from Drew - is it from GenesRus? I am asking specifically about the information in Ketchum's report. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silent Sam Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Who is that quote from Drew - is it from GenesRus? I am asking specifically about the information in Ketchum's report. Thanks. That's a direct quote from Ketchum's paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Hoosierfoot: "This is make or break week for the Ketchum project. It'll either get news coverage and some credible genetic community backing, or it'll fizzle into a non story by next weekend." And then it will instantly and explosively UNfizzle the moment it is confirmed by an outside authority, whether that's two weeks from now, two months, or longer. And yes, this is an excellent post by Scott Carpenter: http://bf-field-jour...study.html#more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) Silent Sam said: That's a direct quote from Ketchum's paper. I'm afraid to ask, but did she include photos of said structures in the woods? I see she has a picture of a horse with a braided mane on the website (or she did a couple days ago).. Yep, still there. https://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/look-what-the-sasquatch-have-been-up-to/ Edited February 18, 2013 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Does anyone have a link to the show last night...other than the Coast to Coast site link? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tearST_J7Uc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Oh thank you, Violet, I can listen on way home from work now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silent Sam Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I'm afraid to ask, but did she include photos of said structures in the woods? I see she has a picture of a horse with a braided mane on the website (or she did a couple days ago).. Yep, still there. https://sasquatchgen...ave-been-up-to/ Yes in the introduction there is a graphic with four rotating images. One is a triptic of a structure along with a hair trap inside the structure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts