Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If bigfoot is real, there should be more Patterson Gimlin videos.   Instead, we are reduced to 'see'ing a bigfoot child doing yoga in a trail cam video.  I don't know what I'm seeing for certain.   The default position has it being more likely something common and explainable vs a winning lottery ticket of a baby Bigfoot playing twister.   

 

Image result for vintage ad game twitster

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks for the childhood memories. 

Chimp or Bear perhaps, Baby bigfoot doubtful. 

Edited by Patterson-Gimlin
Posted

Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found.

  • 2 weeks later...
Admin
Posted
On 10/24/2024 at 4:18 AM, Grubfingers said:

Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found.


The Jacobs creature in my opinion doesn’t have human feet. It’s funny that Meldrum explores the possibility of human size tracks because Will sent him video of a bunch of human sized tracks at a lake in late fall and Meldrum dismissed them.

 

Anyhow the creature exhibits chimp like feet IMO. Yes limb proportions are all wrong for a Bear. Agreed. Buy if a young Sasquatch has feet that are indistinguishable from a Human? I don’t think the Jacobs photo is a young Sasquatch. We would see a heel and a longer foot.

 

I would really would have liked to have been there and looked at the tracks. Because that would solve the mystery in seconds. A Chimp, a Bear and a Human all have feet very different from the other.

Admin
Posted

The Chimps toes are much longer than a Bears. But the Chimp can also curl its toes under the foot. But one track in the mud would be a dead give away. They both lack a heel.

IMG_2127.jpeg

IMG_2128.jpeg

  • 10 months later...
Admin
Posted

At 2:15 a Bear matching the Jacobs creature quarter angle. The head is clearly visible.

 

 

Posted
On 9/6/2025 at 11:53 AM, norseman said:

At 2:15 a Bear matching the Jacobs creature quarter angle. The head is clearly visible.

 

 

I would disagree because this is the left leg.

image.jpeg.3ee8e8cc916996a087f6afaf31b0a12a.jpeg

image.thumb.png.ce343ace27a3a9fd28308b52b56e95a3.pngBear

Posted

image.thumb.jpeg.abc6afafa21e06f61bc7e10006cfd079.jpeg
In comparison this ape has the left leg in the same position and is a perfect match everywhere.

Admin
Posted
5 hours ago, Sircalum said:

I would disagree because this is the left leg.

image.jpeg.3ee8e8cc916996a087f6afaf31b0a12a.jpeg

image.thumb.png.ce343ace27a3a9fd28308b52b56e95a3.pngBear


I disagree. I say that’s the right leg. But the point I am making is that the head and shoulder are entirely different on the Bear.

 

And I do agree that the Jacobs creature lines up nicely with a Chimp.

Posted
5 hours ago, norseman said:


I disagree. I say that’s the right leg. But the point I am making is that the head and shoulder are entirely different on the Bear.

 

And I do agree that the Jacobs creature lines up nicely with a Chimp.

After seeing the abdominal area cut across the right leg on  debates of this there’s no unseeing it. This was the right leg. 

image.thumb.jpeg.07a4325053399e58d50942702a5325fe.jpeg

Admin
Posted
3 hours ago, Sircalum said:

After seeing the abdominal area cut across the right leg on  debates of this there’s no unseeing it. This was the right leg. 

image.thumb.jpeg.07a4325053399e58d50942702a5325fe.jpeg


Yah no.

Posted
1 hour ago, norseman said:


Yah no.

It’s not as wide as it looks when you look closely the arm is in front of that leg. It appears to be one limb. That adds to people thinking it’s the left leg but that arm and leg both get cut off by the underside.

×
×
  • Create New...