Backdoc Posted October 23, 2024 Posted October 23, 2024 If bigfoot is real, there should be more Patterson Gimlin videos. Instead, we are reduced to 'see'ing a bigfoot child doing yoga in a trail cam video. I don't know what I'm seeing for certain. The default position has it being more likely something common and explainable vs a winning lottery ticket of a baby Bigfoot playing twister. 1
Patterson-Gimlin Posted October 24, 2024 Posted October 24, 2024 (edited) Thanks for the childhood memories. Chimp or Bear perhaps, Baby bigfoot doubtful. Edited October 24, 2024 by Patterson-Gimlin
Grubfingers Posted October 24, 2024 Author Posted October 24, 2024 Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found.
norseman Posted November 1, 2024 Admin Posted November 1, 2024 On 10/24/2024 at 4:18 AM, Grubfingers said: Regardless there’s been many changing opinions hence the quest for a matching photo. All these years there has only been 1 found. The Jacobs creature in my opinion doesn’t have human feet. It’s funny that Meldrum explores the possibility of human size tracks because Will sent him video of a bunch of human sized tracks at a lake in late fall and Meldrum dismissed them. Anyhow the creature exhibits chimp like feet IMO. Yes limb proportions are all wrong for a Bear. Agreed. Buy if a young Sasquatch has feet that are indistinguishable from a Human? I don’t think the Jacobs photo is a young Sasquatch. We would see a heel and a longer foot. I would really would have liked to have been there and looked at the tracks. Because that would solve the mystery in seconds. A Chimp, a Bear and a Human all have feet very different from the other.
norseman Posted November 1, 2024 Admin Posted November 1, 2024 The Chimps toes are much longer than a Bears. But the Chimp can also curl its toes under the foot. But one track in the mud would be a dead give away. They both lack a heel.
norseman Posted September 6 Admin Posted September 6 At 2:15 a Bear matching the Jacobs creature quarter angle. The head is clearly visible.
Sircalum Posted yesterday at 09:01 AM Posted yesterday at 09:01 AM On 9/6/2025 at 11:53 AM, norseman said: At 2:15 a Bear matching the Jacobs creature quarter angle. The head is clearly visible. I would disagree because this is the left leg. Bear
Sircalum Posted yesterday at 09:06 AM Posted yesterday at 09:06 AM In comparison this ape has the left leg in the same position and is a perfect match everywhere.
norseman Posted yesterday at 02:08 PM Admin Posted yesterday at 02:08 PM 5 hours ago, Sircalum said: I would disagree because this is the left leg. Bear I disagree. I say that’s the right leg. But the point I am making is that the head and shoulder are entirely different on the Bear. And I do agree that the Jacobs creature lines up nicely with a Chimp.
Sircalum Posted yesterday at 07:31 PM Posted yesterday at 07:31 PM 5 hours ago, norseman said: I disagree. I say that’s the right leg. But the point I am making is that the head and shoulder are entirely different on the Bear. And I do agree that the Jacobs creature lines up nicely with a Chimp. After seeing the abdominal area cut across the right leg on debates of this there’s no unseeing it. This was the right leg.
norseman Posted 22 hours ago Admin Posted 22 hours ago 3 hours ago, Sircalum said: After seeing the abdominal area cut across the right leg on debates of this there’s no unseeing it. This was the right leg. Yah no.
Sircalum Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, norseman said: Yah no. It’s not as wide as it looks when you look closely the arm is in front of that leg. It appears to be one limb. That adds to people thinking it’s the left leg but that arm and leg both get cut off by the underside.
Recommended Posts