gigantor Posted November 30, 2012 Admin Posted November 30, 2012 bump... If you are new here, please make your prediction so you can eat crow later. Those of you who already guessed wrong, have another try...
Guest BFSleuth Posted November 30, 2012 Posted November 30, 2012 I already guessed wrong in the Ketchum thread, so I'll fire away here. January 10, 2013
Guest Posted November 30, 2012 Posted November 30, 2012 (edited) delete Edited November 30, 2012 by zigoapex
Guest gershake Posted November 30, 2012 Posted November 30, 2012 My first cut-off date was June 30th 2012. I'm still within my second cut-off date, December 31st 2012... *gulp*
gigantor Posted December 1, 2012 Admin Posted December 1, 2012 (edited) I'm going to say January 9th, 2013 just to preempt BFS Edited December 1, 2012 by gigantor
PBeaton Posted December 1, 2012 Posted December 1, 2012 Haven't read the entire thread, just hopped to the first pg, ta get the jist of the question, then here. What's the rush ? Why hear somethin' unfinished ? Timeline...huh, when information is presented in a formal manner an for per-review, an science has had its chance to review it. So...guess I'm sayin'...I'm in no hurry. Pat...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted December 1, 2012 Posted December 1, 2012 (edited) I hope I don't have to make a second cut-off date Edited December 1, 2012 by OntarioSquatch
the parkie Posted December 1, 2012 Posted December 1, 2012 My circumcision is booked for next Wednesday. I don't see what this has to do with Bigfoot though. 1
PBeaton Posted December 1, 2012 Posted December 1, 2012 the parkie, Me either ! But thanks for the laugh ! Good'n ! .... Pat...
salubrious Posted December 1, 2012 Moderator Posted December 1, 2012 I'd like to see how long people will wait, believing that what has been hinted about (Ketchum/Erickson/Smeja) will be released to the public? How long is long enough to show that there's nothing there? I guess in a way you can kinda call it a pool if you will- what's the date you write it off personally? Well we have seen a Ketchum release something that has been hinted... I've have no concern about it. I already know BF are out there, so its moot. I am interested in knowing more about them though.
Guest DWA Posted June 18, 2017 Posted June 18, 2017 On 10/16/2011 at 0:12 AM, TimB said: I'd like to see how long people will wait, believing that what has been hinted about (Ketchum/Erickson/Smeja) will be released to the public? How long is long enough to show that there's nothing there? I guess in a way you can kinda call it a pool if you will- what's the date you write it off personally? Mine is December 10th, 2011. Tim B. I don't know where that date comes from. K/E/S *got nut-tin,* and we KNOW it the way we know all things in science: they blared about it and presented no evidence passing scientific muster. Sierra Steaks. IN-deed. Big-ass lemur, shooooooooooooooore, any time yer ready with that. A guy in Manitoba shot one, in 1941, no he DID, and he said he did and read his report and HE DID UNTIL YOU PROVE HE DIDNT, and done. see how science works? You tell us you got the goods, specific goods, like here they come no here they come here come the goods, and no goods? and we laugh. You relate to us an experience there is no reason for us not to believe? Different response, and if you don't get it, no, you *don't* know how science works. The experience goes on the impressive pile that bolsters the three-part immovable tripod of unshakeable proof that an unlisted primate inhabits North America. And jokes? ARE JOKES.
JDL Posted June 18, 2017 Posted June 18, 2017 This is really a question for those who haven't come face to face with one. If you have, then you understand that, for whatever reason they haven't been disclosed, it's not a matter of nonexistence. 2
Recommended Posts