OntarioSquatch Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Wasn’t the idea of Bigfoot “zapping” people originally made up by hoaxers? It’s 2024 and I still don’t know of any credible reports where someone actually got “zapped”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catmandoo Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Was the equipment a camcorder, point & shoot. DLSR or smartphone? Will there be audio? If audio, in camera mic or external mic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoKee Posted February 3 Author Share Posted February 3 I"m about ready to release footage but am waiting for an opportunity to get one more shot at it. I've got a bigfoot patterned and will need to use an old fashioned 35mm camera vs. digital . be patient 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) I really don't know what all the fuss is about here. We all know that photo/video isn't proof. Never has been, never will be. Proof can only be attained through verified physical evidence. So just relax, smile, nod your heads, stop being so gullible (again), thank Lokee for the ride, and move on. Edited February 3 by hiflier 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 7 minutes ago, hiflier said: I really don't know what all the fuss is about here. We all know that photo/video isn't proof. Never has been, never will be. Proof can only be attained through verified physical evidence.......... Yeah, but it's always fun to look at and dream. It's like pornography, but moral. Quote ........So just relax, smile, nod your heads, stop being so gullible (again), thank Lokee for the ride, and move on. Hey, the ride isn't over! I haven't even got to the point where my tummy is upset and I need to puke. Let this carnival ride play out for those of us who need entertainment. It's -20 outside. I don't want to go out in that to play. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Oh, alright then, Huntster. For you I'll let Lokee grab a little more mileage. It's cold here, too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 hours ago, hiflier said: .........It's cold here, too I'll bet. I had to go out to haul more firewood from the pile to the wood boxes in the garage. Brrrrrrr! No sasquatches in their right minds out there today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Well you're a pretty tough ol' bird. If the Sasquatches were around you'd probably beat them silly and then make them load the wood boxes, 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 6 hours ago, LoKee said: I"m about ready to release footage but am waiting for an opportunity to get one more shot at it. I've got a bigfoot patterned and will need to use an old fashioned 35mm camera vs. digital . be patient If the reason you are procrastinating is having difficulties finding a tall subject to play the part. I know someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 22 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: If the reason you are procrastinating is having difficulties finding a tall subject to play the part. I know someone. Yaaah. We have never seen any proof of that either…. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 8 minutes ago, norseman said: Yaaah. We have never seen any proof of that either…. Would a photo do, or does it have to be a carcass? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 40 minutes ago, Huntster said: Would a photo do, or does it have to be a carcass? Is he a new species?🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 hours ago, norseman said: Is he a new species?🤔 Dunno. Maybe a DNA analysis first is warranted? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Lights Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 On 2/3/2024 at 4:27 PM, hiflier said: I really don't know what all the fuss is about here. We all know that photo/video isn't proof. Never has been, never will be. Proof can only be attained through verified physical evidence. So just relax, smile, nod your heads, stop being so gullible (again), thank Lokee for the ride, and move on. I disagree. If I'm able to video a 9 foot squatch and be able to recreate it after the fact, that should suffice. The recreation will need to prove it was actually 9 feet tall, outside of all human range. Additionally the video will need to prove it was not CGI. I use a video camera that cannot have anything uploaded to it, only download. So if I keep that file on the camera, it can be authenticated. Arms and legs are going to be proportional, flexing at elbows and knees, having head turn at the neck, eyes and mouth moving. No manual "suit" can do all those things at 9 feet. I think this would actually work as 100% evidence. Am I missing anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 9 minutes ago, Northern Lights said: I disagree. If I'm able to video a 9 foot squatch and be able to recreate it after the fact, that should suffice. The recreation will need to prove it was actually 9 feet tall, outside of all human range. Additionally the video will need to prove it was not CGI. I use a video camera that cannot have anything uploaded to it, only download. So if I keep that file on the camera, it can be authenticated. Arms and legs are going to be proportional, flexing at elbows and knees, having head turn at the neck, eyes and mouth moving. No manual "suit" can do all those things at 9 feet. I think this would actually work as 100% evidence. Am I missing anything? Yes. A type specimen. Proof and evidence are two different things. And the problem with Bigfoot is all the hoaxing in the past. So scientific doesn’t even look at our evidence anymore. So photos, videos and foot casts are immediately dismissed offhand by science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts