Guest Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 (edited) We haven't heard a long time from Sasky, who's apparently directly involved with the Erickson project. Hmm. Maybe she can shed some light on this. What else does the video show? I do suspect that she's the lead scientist of the project. If this was the case I'd really like to hear from her about her feelings towards the hoax allegations, the Brisson photos, the rock throwing and especially the Sylvanic footage/case that Erickson thinks is legit. Edited August 19, 2011 by SwissChris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'm pretty sure Sasky stated at one point that she's not Leila Hadj-Chikh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 When did he say that ?? The still Frame was only released yesterday ?? John had said this to me on a couple of occassions ... the last being this past Wednsday as he sat in his living room. He and June was sitting on their love-seat and I was sitting on the couch. I believe John had said that it was Erickson who showed him some film footage. It was then that our conversation moved onto the Ivan Marx cripple-foot video hoax and the length some people will go to so to hoax a video. I recall us also talking about our belief that the Carter Coy claims was ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest believer Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Getting that close to a Sasquatch is a blessing I accept it for what they say it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'm pretty sure Sasky stated at one point that she's not Leila Hadj-Chikh. Ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bigfoothunter Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Getting that close to a Sasquatch is a blessing I accept it for what they say it is. If I want to believe in something based on someones word, then I'll stick to religion. I mean .... didn't the georgia hoax not teach us something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest COGrizzly Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 I'm pretty sure Sasky stated at one point that she's not Leila Hadj-Chikh. She is not. 100% sure. Super nice person though, in my experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 (edited) Bigfoothunter, and Steenburg, We are Friends of Randy Brisson and the Erickson team, We are tired of your incorrect information about Randy, You and Steenburg are angry that your not with the ones getting it Done, Thomas lives about 20 min from Randy and has his number, Randy is the only one to get Great Evidence from Canada, He has Videos and other Great Evidence. Melba, and the Scientist, and Adrian, will back Randy up 100 percent. You have no direct involvement so are just guessing, at best. Many do not want anything to do with you guys. Edited August 20, 2011 by Jodie edited to conform to forum rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 So what is this "great evidence"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steenburg Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 (edited) Bigfoothunter, and Steenburg, We are Friends of Randy Brisson and the Erickson team, We are tired of your incorrect information about Randy, You and Steenburg are angry that your not with the ones getting it Done, Thomas lives about 20 min from Randy and has his number, Randy is the only one to get Great Evidence from Canada, He has Videos and other Great Evidence. Melba, and the Scientist, and Adrian, will back Randy up 100 percent. You have no direct involvement so are just guessing, at best. Many do not want anything to do with you guys. LOL Well I guess I am destined to be the outsider looking in Thomas Steenburg Edited August 20, 2011 by Jodie edited original quote and response to conform to forum rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest believer Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 I grew up in Kentucky and to me this is just continued affirmation of what I had been told growing up. I talked to Mr. Erikson and I believe him. I think turkey hunting with a knife would be easier than stalking a squatch. For those folks to interact at those sites with one is a blessing. I know everyone on here would not pass on an opportunity Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 <br />So what is this "great evidence"?<br /><br /><br /><br />And in all caps, too! Dare we hope...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jimmy simpson Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 So what is this "great evidence"? No kidding... on the erickson trailer it is referred to as "compelling evidence".... compelling evidence has sent many innocent people to jail... a project, and people that boast the way those surrounded with the erickson project seem to, should be using words like " concrete proof"... sketchy videos, hair samples, and all that really mean nothing...seriously, lose morality for a day. If you have time to point a video camera at one and get hours of footage... you can put a bullet in one... then call national geo graphic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 You know it's funny what Leila Hadj-Chikh says in the trailer: "Definitely we had some really great opportunities to collect quite compelling evidence..." Just opportunities? I hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 (edited) No kidding... on the erickson trailer it is referred to as "compelling evidence".... compelling evidence has sent many innocent people to jail... a project, and people that boast the way those surrounded with the erickson project seem to, should be using words like " concrete proof"... sketchy videos, hair samples, and all that really mean nothing...seriously, lose morality for a day. If you have time to point a video camera at one and get hours of footage... you can put a bullet in one... then call national geo graphic... Actually I was referring to the post by "Bigguysquatch" who said that Randy Brisson is the only one who has collected "Great Evidence" from Canada. Brisson is the guy who shot the head-over-the-stump pics which are - in my opinion - hoaxes. Edited August 21, 2011 by SwissChris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts