What Happens If Dna Suggests Sasquatch Have Bred With Humans?

[Incorrigible1]

Slaughtered? Really? Do you happen to know of any spare carcasses laying around?

[georgerm]

I saw a comment on BFevidence that made a good point. If DNA suggests Sasquatch have raped human women, then what happens to them? The comment suggests they'll be exterminated, and that idea made me think two things. First, yes, that will happen even if the government tries to prevent it. It would be open season on them, year round. Second, there have been conspiracy theories suggesting the gov't already knows about them. Assuming this is true (just for arguments sake) - maybe that problem - Sasquatch being hunted down mercilessly - is the reason it's been covered up.

If human females gave birth to hybrids, how would human DNA be interjected in the BF population? The hybrids would become part of the human population and BF DNA might be found in human populations. There is also a good chance that hybrids would be sterile just as mules are. If human males bred with female BFs then human DNA might be found in BF populations unless hybids are sterile.

If BF is a government cover up then when and where do these secret discussions occur? Does Obama meet with BLM and Forest Service officials so they can establish a common government BF policy which they hide from the public? Don't think so...........................

[Guest]

What to do with the Sasquatch problem is always first on the agenda at the Bilderberg meetings. Duh.

[Guest shoot1]

Slaughtered? Really? Do you happen to know of any spare carcasses laying around?

not yet. (I said "will be", not "have been")

I am writing this on a tablet, so please forgive the lack of quotes.

-If human females gave birth to hybrids, how would human DNA be interjected in the BF population?

...The victimized female would be kept with/by the Sasquatch (at least until giving birth) and their offspring would be raised by the squatch.

-The hybrids would become part of the human population and BF DNA might be found in human populations.

...I am thinking its the other way around.

- There is also a good chance that hybrids would be sterile just as mules are.

...thus partially explaining lone (shunned?) Sasquatch, small Sasquatch, and the differences in appearance.

- If human males bred with female BFs then human DNA might be found in BF populations unless hybrids are sterile.

...okay but why are you differentiating between the offspring of Bigfoot male/human female vs. Human male/Bigfoot female pairing?

If BF is a government cover up then when and where do these secret discussions occur? Does Obama meet with BLM and Forest Service officials so they can establish a common government BF policy which they hide from the public? Don't think so....

- never even occurred to me to speculate on that. Maybe at area 52?

Edited May 18, 2012 by shoot1

[Guest OntarioSquatch]

About public knowledge...believe it or not it's likely due to us that governments keep things like ufo's, aliens & bigfoot a secret. Anything that could negatively affect us as a whole can and will be kept a secret. If you look at the public FBI vault on their website, there are only several documents that talk about the e.t's and they are from about 50 years ago. Obviously what they let us know is hardly even the tip of the "iceberg". How would the typical family react knowing there are 8ft hairy bipeds where they are camping that could possibly kidnap and rape someone?

[Guest Transformer]

Is this the humor thread?

[Guest Gizzy]

I was laughing anyway......

[Guest]

Is this the humor thread?

I wasnt sure but I find it to be one of the stupidist topics ever started. Some of the what ifs are funny tho...according to some the slaughter of the species will be on if the dna shows that homo females were introduced into the genetic makeup of the sasquatch .

not yet. (I said "will be", not "have been")

- never even occurred to me to speculate on that. Maybe at area 52?

Area 52 is where they hold the squatches? area 51 is for the aliens so I guess its fair squatches get their own secret facility , with their increased popularity of late.

[Guest shoot1]

I wasnt sure but I find it to be one of the stupidist topics ever started. Some of the what ifs are funny tho...according to some the slaughter of the species will be on if the dna shows that homo females were introduced into the genetic makeup of the sasquatch .

Area 52 is where they hold the squatches? area 51 is for the aliens so I guess its fair squatches get their own secret facility , with their increased popularity of late.

Stupidest? Aww, c'mon, lighten up. I was actually half serious but probably should have chosen my words more carefully. I thought it was interesting and really do think there would (will?) be serious moral/ethical issues raised if squatch are proven to exist. Extermination might be too strong of a word, but some people definitely would be so inclined.

And I waffled on revealing Area 52. There are so few of us with this level of security clearance that they are bound to find me sooner or later...

Is this the humor thread?

More like "What if?", but I'll be sure to emphasize that point by putting "[What If...]" in the title the next time I make a post like this.

Edited May 19, 2012 by shoot1

[bipedalist]

You can't prove rape by DNA alone......

Enter the new field of forensic paleo-anthropology.

[Guest Bigfoothunter]

So someone has an interest in whether or not there could be a rapist/sasquatch out there? I don't know if this thread was created to bring about a dark day for Sasquatch in general or for thread creators. (sigh)

DNA test that can tell us if the raping of a human woman by a Sasuatch was intentional or consenual - that's a mind boggeler for sure. Let us ponder a step further and consider if DNA testing will one day be able to determing if the act was real or merely role playing between the Sasquatch and his human companion. I have a feeling that this question has already been answered by the National Enquirer somehow. Someone should contact Sasquatch language expert Carter Coy to see if 'no' means 'yes' to a Sasquatch. If it does, a rape charge may be hard to get.

Again ... what a dark day in the Sasquatch arena.

[Guest]

After viewing almost every one of the reports in BFRO, GCBRO, TBRC, Oregon Bigfoot, etc, etc, does anyone remember a report where bigfoot got frisky with the ladies? I can think of one and only one where a woman reported several encounters outdoors with a bigfoot (in Mississippi, I think) was in an aroused state, but that is it.

It doesn't mean it never happened, but we have thousands of reports, and very, very few have anyone being harmed by a sasquatch, let alone sexually assaulted. I really don't think it's something we have to worry about.

[Guest BFSleuth]

True that, there is a lack of reports noting amorous intent. OTOH would you be more or less inclined to report a sighting if it involved unwanted (or wanted) amorous activity?

[Guest OntarioSquatch]

Most attack survivors often had a car or a firearm.

Here's a guy that got chased by two of them

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFvxDMZsqDs

[Guest]

In all the reports I've read, I've often heard about aggressive displays, shaking trees, tearing up vegetation, screaming/yelling, chasing and escorting out of an area, but how many reports do we actually have of a sasquatch hitting, grabbing, punching, biting, or actual physical contact with a human? Very, very few, as far as I know.

Not that I wouldn't be scared blankless if I even saw one, but what is the likelihood of being assaulted by one?

Then there is that story about some guy and his father on some Oregon mountain pass they drove over in the dead of winter, with the restaurant closed and parking lot deserted, and they stopped in the middle of the night there to relieve themselves. The were then stalked and hunted (so they claim) by a band of sasquatches! Now that story really was scary!

I wonder how many of us could even survive a physical encounter with one, let alone live to write a report on it!

Edited May 19, 2012 by Pithecus