Jump to content

Rick Dyer Again


Guest Scout1959

Recommended Posts

When the shot was fired and BF was a confirmed kill, then this no longer became a documentary about men and monsters, it became a documentary about the greatest find since the New World. Oh, hold on, wait until the film festival! Yeah ok!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest VioletX

What anyone says isn't proof. They tried the block of ice routine last time. The body needs to be examined, not just looked at.

What anyone says isn't proof. They tried the block of ice routine last time. The body needs to be examined, not just looked at.

Apart from whatever scientists that Dyer all ready have examined the Bigfoot, you would like to see a medical doctor or scientist examine the body, you would not trust the FB/FB guys? You think Dyer can create that good of a 600 lb 9ft fake Bf body ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the shot was fired and BF was a confirmed kill, then this no longer became a documentary about men and monsters, it became a documentary about the greatest find since the New World. Oh, hold on, wait until the film festival! Yeah ok!

Yes but as strange as it may seem, WE think it would be the greatest find since the New World, but the majority of the population dont think that! People are amazed when I tell them that I am fascinated in Sasquatch. I cant understand why they arent lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Thepattywagon

Everyone will still be waiting with anticipation for Musky's confirmation of a hoax or Bigfoot, and if FB/FB goes out there and say it is a Bigfoot than it is a Bigfoot.

Yea, I can think of no two people so infinitely qualified to tell us what is and what is not a Bigfoot.

Hey, here's an idea. If he's got one, why not stop wasting time and allow a REAL scientist, biologist, or any 'ist' that isn't a 'con artist', examine and share their observations with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I can think of no two people so infinitely qualified to tell us what is and what is not a Bigfoot.

Hey, here's an idea. If he's got one, why not stop wasting time and allow a REAL scientist, biologist, or any 'ist' that isn't a 'con artist', examine and share their observations with us.

Then it would be over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from whatever scientists that Dyer all ready have examined the Bigfoot, you would like to see a medical doctor or scientist examine the body, you would not trust the FB/FB guys? You think Dyer can create that good of a 600 lb 9ft fake Bf body ??

What scientist viewed the body? It has to be more than one and they have to be well known. He had his brother-in-law (or it was Whitton's BIL) pose as the doctor in 08.

The FB/FB guys have rated known fake videos highly, because their checklist system is flawed. I wouldn't trust any site alone unless it was backed up by scientific study. People are easily fooled. And I know Rick talks about how DNA is easily fooled by mixing two samples, but if there's a body, there's no way an examination doesn't prove or disprove this right away.

I don't trust Rick. Because of that he needs to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt this is true. It could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest VioletX

Yea, I can think of no two people so infinitely qualified to tell us what is and what is not a Bigfoot.

Hey, here's an idea. If he's got one, why not stop wasting time and allow a REAL scientist, biologist, or any 'ist' that isn't a 'con artist', examine and share their observations with us.

Ok, we have all ben fooled by video, but if these two guys are fooled by a huge body made out of rubber or Spam than I will lose all faith in them,lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I can think of no two people so infinitely qualified to tell us what is and what is not a Bigfoot.

Hey, here's an idea. If he's got one, why not stop wasting time and allow a REAL scientist, biologist, or any 'ist' that isn't a 'con artist', examine and share their observations with us.

But he originally said that the body was also being examined by I think 3 scientists since September?

What scientist viewed the body? It has to be more than one and they have to be well known. He had his brother-in-law (or it was Whitton's BIL) pose as the doctor in 08.

The FB/FB guys have rated known fake videos highly, because their checklist system is flawed. I wouldn't trust any site alone unless it was backed up by scientific study. People are easily fooled. And I know Rick talks about how DNA is easily fooled by mixing two samples, but if there's a body, there's no way an examination doesn't prove or disprove this right away.

I don't trust Rick. Because of that he needs to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt this is true. It could happen.

3 scientists have been involved apparantly - keep up njjohn!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I can think of no two people so infinitely qualified to tell us what is and what is not a Bigfoot.

Hey, here's an idea. If he's got one, why not stop wasting time and allow a REAL scientist, biologist, or any 'ist' that isn't a 'con artist', examine and share their observations with us.

I agree. I was not impressed with their video to "catch" everyone up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am keeping up... still no names. I could claim I had 5 scientists look into this and they said it's fake. Claims don't equal proof.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time :) The only piece of evidence we have is the tent video. Everything else is claims. And when you're supposed to trust someone's word, that person's credibility to tell the truth comes into play. I don't think anyone can disagree there's reasons to question RD's authenticity. This could all be true, but there's more holes in this story than there is substance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JackiLB, I have a soul and I have common sense. I know there are people in this world with real issues. Believe me I know, I was married to one for 25 years. She would lie to me and I would believe it over and over because I gave second, third, fourth and many many more chances. The last straw for me is when she left me and my 16 year old son for another man. Even though she still tried to say she didn't. If you think RD is telling the truth, that is fine. My gut and common sense tells me otherwise.

Here is something to think about, If you were looking for someone to clean your house on a daily basis and then you found out she had been arrested for stealing from people not once, but twice! You talk to them and they say I did that I admit, but I was wrong and I am sorry, would you still let them into your home?

KB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...