Will All Of You Please Sign This Petition To Protect The Sasquatch?

[Guest]

I am hopeful of us being able to protect the Sasquatch species from harm when the DNA and hi-def videos are released. If everyone here would sign this petition and join the protection cause we can all make a difference in the future of the Sasquatch.Thank you to all who are willing to join this effort.

https://petitions.wh...ng-any/FlSBT2vj

Edited January 14, 2013 by masterbarber
Repaired link

[norseman]

I'll sign it the second the species is recognized by science........and not a second before.

[Guest]

I totally understand your feelings. Will the DNA being published in a scientific journal work for you? Will you consider that as being recognized by science?

Edited January 13, 2013 by SweetSusiq

[norseman]

I totally understand your feelings. Will the DNA being published in a scientific journal work for you? Will you consider that as being recognized by science?

No. I would want to see science use the DNA as a type specimen to create species classification.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_(biology)

[Guest OntarioSquatch]

I'll sign it the second the species is recognized by science........and not a second before.

Plussed norseman.

Trying to get protection for Bigfoot right now would be as productive as trying to get protection for unicorns.

[Guest COGrizzly]

Correct OS and norseman. (Agreed)

[Guest RedRatSnake]

This kinda thing is just going to fuel ridicule and promote it up the "just a joke" meter all that much more, species first, petitions latter, you want do something good for science, start a petition to save the "Coelacanth"

Tim

[Oonjerah]

What Norseman, Ontario, Grizzly and RRS said, Ditto.

Being asked for my signature now is inappropriate, to put it very nicely.

[Guest]

I wonder why BF would even need protection?

I tend to doubt people are gonna be out to bag a BF once they are deemed to actually exist by "science". If that even happens.

IMHO, those who try to gun down a BF for fun, or, profit, fully deserve whatever negative fate awaits them.

Don't worry about BF.

They're way better at surviving, and, thriving, without our help.

[Guest steery]

As above.

If BF exists, it has managed to avoid detection for this long so why would it be in need of protection?

[dopelyrics]

Yes I agree with the above.

With all due respect, SweetSusiq, this is really putting the cart before the horse.

Kind regards,

Lee

[Guest BastetsCat]

I will not lend my name even when they are recognized. They can protect themselves. The way protection works, it is all or nothing. I don't agree with this way of thinking. I use the little owl that was protected, barring logging in the forest....all logging is not strip logging or bare cutting of forest. Because the forest was not thinned due to a single species, they all lost out. One of the biggest fires in Arizona history happened. Not only did the owls die, I sight this as poor management, so did countless other species of animals....and people and pets lost their homes or lives.

Protection in the way it exists today is a fiasco.

Preserve habitat, okay I would sign for that.....but only if and when the protection of habitat includes balance.

[Guest]

I'm just curious who you would give this petition to?

[Guest Cervelo]

As soon I see the body, head, hand or foot.

The petition is to the Federal govt. I think.

[Guest]

I think it's wise to have it all set up and ready to go out for signatures, but I too think it's premature. First, you have to have proof they exist... can't save something that doesn't officially exist... we don't even know what genus and species they are officially.