Guest Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Feel free to discuss who you think are the most capable group of people for obtaining scientific recognition of the Sasquatch species in North America is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 I personally am placing my bets on either the NAWAC or Bryan Sykes and his DNA study. JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clubbedfoot Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 If i saw one.....I'd say it's already been discovered....And I would never try to deny someone elses reality.....Not only is that incredibly arrogant....It's impossible to do so.... It's not unlike the history books that say Columbus discovered America..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Junior Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 I m no expert but went with the group that seem to be doing things the right way and seem to have a plan and brains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted June 21, 2013 SSR Team Share Posted June 21, 2013 I "discovered" it years ago when I saw one. As far anyone that brings it to the attention of the masses, who cares, and by judging on the distinct lack of any real, worthwhile evidence that anyone has provided in the last however many years ( except the PGF ) I wouldn't say any specific group is doing a very good job "discovering" Sasquatches if I'm brutally honest. Some are ok at making money from the subject but as for actually proving it exists and "discovering" it, I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Read John Bindernagel's The Discovery of the Sasquatch (2010). He thinks it's already happened, and makes a good case, using the history of science as his backdrop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIB Posted June 21, 2013 Moderator Share Posted June 21, 2013 BobbyO - I tried to "plus" you but I'm out for the day so all I can offer is . Ditto, my sentiments, my experiences, my thoughts exactly. MIB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 There's a general meme, here on BFF, of another possibility. That is being plowed into by a logging truck or other large vehicle. I would opt for that as a most likely possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 I put in for RD. I've seen the tent video, and it made me a bit mad right there. Not happy to listen to that particular youtube on the skeptic that went to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 I'm going to say that Sykes/Satori/Meldrum is the logical "next at bat", but it remains to be seen if they have any squatch samples in the study to begin with. I'm still not convinced that we won't eventually find out that the badly-mishandled Ketchum Study got there first, but was so poorly put forth that it put a fatal taint on its data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted June 24, 2013 SSR Team Share Posted June 24, 2013 (edited) There's a general meme, here on BFF, of another possibility. That is being plowed into by a logging truck or other large vehicle. I would opt for that as a most likely possibility.Yep, I would have voted for that.Edit : Just seen that Dyer is an option in the poll. Goodness gracious me. And what's even more astounding is that he has 2 votes. Edited June 24, 2013 by BobbyO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterbarber Posted June 24, 2013 Admin Share Posted June 24, 2013 Why, The BFF -of course....... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted June 24, 2013 BFF Patron Share Posted June 24, 2013 Certainly there is some member pulling going on with those Dyer votes. Not a credible option IMHO. <<<<understatement of the year>>>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 I would have checked the box: "nobody" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 (edited) I would like to think the NAWAC has a chance, but it would really depend on whether they are being honest about their experiences or not. I also believe Sykes has a chance, but it doesn't seem likely. One thing I firmly believe though, is that a biologically real species of large primate can't stay hidden forever. Edited June 24, 2013 by OntarioSquatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts